What about simply being assertive in making your points?
IE: if you have a valid point, you will get your way.
Divide and concur. Ruling through lowest common denominator by abstracting reality and the structure of society. You must talk to people in order to help fix this.
(Yes, I am crawling up my own ass, and yes I have been drinking.)
He's actually rather attractive for an Asian man. You know what would make him even more attractive? If he kept his damn cloths on, and acted like an adult while on stage.
OH, and since he seems to have no actual talents. He can remove himself from that stage while he's at it.
I can understand the sentiment. But I wouldn't just lump a guy like Keanu Reeves or even Nicolas Cage for that matter, in with the general lowlifes of Hollywood.
https://people.com/movies/zazie-beetz-mourns-loss-of-her-stunt-double-joi-sj-harris/
The skin tone doesn't even match. Why?
She added, “SJ is a remarkable person, and I want her legacy of being an inspiration to women who ride to continue for many more years to come.”
Inspirational? Nobody has a clue who she was. And knowing about her, would only serve as a horrific cautionary tale.
He 'feels' unfazed. This just tells me that he doesn't 'feel' his life is effected. He is clearly to dumb to understand his own life, or how the world around him works.
Also, get knocked up by a man with money before leaving him, leaving him on the hook for child support.
This was the premise for the movie Robocop 2.
I'd be mildly displeased with my family, if I was not allowed to date this person. If I had chosen to date her.
I however would not pay to watch this movie. Nor would I watch it for free.
the scoring is the original sin -
They added algos to obscure voting shortly after creating subs. So, nothing inherently wrong with voting, until they made cheating easier, by claiming to make cheating harder.
First of all I am a MGTOW guy, I would never ever get married.
Though off topic, I feel the need to point out that "going your own way" does not mean following the behavior patterns of a niche internet group to a fault blindly. "your own way" can allow for change and expectations.
A house fire, would never cremate a body of that size.
Plot synopses says, the police are returning within the hour.
Which leaves them calling back up fire reserves, and then still needing a crane for the body.
Makes no sense. Leaves them suspect to several crimes.
How did a movie this simple cost 11 million dollars in 1993?
Her backup dancers have accused her of making them eat bananas out of the vaginas of prostitutes.
A live services game, with a limited aspect premise baked into the title. What could go wrong?
How much free time and passive income must you have to make this an option, not just for you, but the people that you know?
Gates of hell? Cabbage patch dolls? Hatchlings? It's all so strange.
This post has existed for 8 hours. You are the first person to ask this question. I have no idea whats going on.
I just want to know why they are dancing at a gas station.
She looks so menacing. /s
Everything in the scene is wrong.
-
They keep the robot in a box.
-
The robot's crate is new
-
The robot is old and warn
-
How did they move such a massive crate containing a heavy duty robot to it's location to the center of the clearing alongside the other boxes?
-
why did they not offload those boxes to their actual destination? They flew them there after all.
-
how did they move those boxes, when they only have fighting robots and not moving robots?
-
Were there moving robots not shown?
-
The box the robot is packed in is filled with cool air for some reason that rushes out.
-
They pick up a box for a robot to hand it to it, thus doing more work than the bot will do carrying the box
-
They are flying around with excess weight they need to off load
-
There aren't even enough boxes to warrant unpacking the bot
-
This excess weight includes one single fighting robot, out of an entire army that refuses to fight.
-
They carried the box containing the robot to that location, as apposed to simply having it walk to that location
-
There is no reason to have a garrison, or any of that gear at that location
-
Again, why is the bot in a box?
-
The few boxes that need to be moved were moved to that location, only to be moved to another
-
Zack constructed this scene to give the audience information, while simply not understanding the logistics of moving boxes efficiently, utilizing the robot in the scene.
It would be easier to list the number of scenes that make sense in this movie, as that list would be zero.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rebel_moon_part_1_a_child_of_fire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzczijDtnFY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ATnBuOMOZY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-s4jYm9Mz4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDTOD94YRpY
Because you think that I am a spaz, this makes you hope that I am a bot. Got it.
They're writing the names of the movies before writing the scripts. Can work for a title of an episode of Rick and Morty, but not a movie named Rebel Moon, where you write those rebels as simple farmers using horse drawn plows.
What an odd thing to say.
🎞️