Is that someone you?

I'm more offended by this dialogue.

Are you? Are you really? You are offended by this?

++

• "You need anything for your ship, she's got you covered."

You can buy things for your ship. Or she can repair your ship.

• "She may be a little rough around the edges, but she's just looking out for her own. There's no one better to have your back."

She belongs to a faction or will react poorly to someone elses death.

• "Naeva's got a fire in her. The kind you only see in an engine pushed to its limit. She doesn't half-ass a damn thing and I love her for it."

Here is an aspect of her character you will not be able to derive through standard game play, or we wish for you to know about her up front.

++

You got replacement dialog for any of that? Because if not, you've said nothing here. Oh, yagh, lesbians are abuser, which is an agenda you wish to push I suppose. True or not. Is this thread of any actual value? Are they pushing modern woke tropes? Did you get any of that from your dialog examples?

None of that made me cringe.

Now lets ask some real Questions:

• Are there any good game play mechanics?

• Is it packed to the brim with loot boxes, and unavoidable subscription fees and micro transaction? Yes, or no?

• Are these actual characters or modern woke tropes crafted to push an agenda?

++

8 Hours later: Does nobody know the answer to any of my Questions? Really, nobody? Nobody knows anything about the actual game?

I have. She was fired.

It's criticism of his own work. As he does not see what he has created as having value.

Funny to see that the original character design had purple hair. Really dropped the ball on that easy layup.

Well, that's her ratting in the Woman's league.

Sammy Kerr?

It's this simple, do they appear to think about the Questions you ask them, or do they simply reply? That being said, your Question is quite open ended, and needs to be more specific on topics, range and form of analytical thought for a more accurate answer. Because as it stands you can say that everyone fits the standard for 'thinking outside of the box.'

Sometime later, Sasha, Gloria and her husband take Stereotypical Barbie, now going by Barbara Roberts, to a gynecologist for her first appointment.

The rest of the film seems to be deconstructions of Barbie tropes. Which is like, a good premise for a Twilight Zone episode, or possibly a B plot for Rick & Morty story line.

The abstraction of reality is way past gone on this one. We are dealing with Food Fight! logic.

I'd ask if the game play is any good. But modern games have done away with such concepts and are just interactive stories with payment schemes, visuals and propaganda.

What game companies want are ESG funds. And nothing else.

They seem to be blackmailers who are just talking about the current issue to drum up interest and support.

Texas needs to create and enforce state laws. Stop playing by the rules of the federal government, and start knee capping them.

I'm not claiming either way. But sometimes the cause is the the effect and vise versa. And sometimes they cause each other in a perpetual loop. My statements were more on the language of causality, and not the topic itself. As it tends to lock one into a singular logic set.

I want to know how the pregnant woman weaponized fire. Hairspray and a lighter? Simply put a lighter to his clothes under his field of vision? A nearby burn barrel?

But which causes which? A term I never here is "reversing the cause and effect." Well I here it in my head all the time. And it's not the same as "consequence not a causation" which has the effect of absolving all responsibility. And sometimes the cause and the effect, cause and effect each other. Is there a term for that catalytic behavior?

Now good luck finding games with game play, and not just glorified skinner boxes.

He's Satanist. He is not a useful idiot, but a person willfully using deception and deceit for personal gains.

https://tenor.com/view/willy-wonka-really-huh-gif-15522979

Kind of looks like that time Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was experimenting with mescaline.

As a human in this thread. What am I to care about? What is the point?

As for the MCU, everything was rather good. Right up until End Game. Which to me appeared to be a quick and dirty rewrite, for political reasons to confusing to understand. Though the key elements are, ESG funds, population control, virus of unspecified origin, vaccines of unknown reasons to exist and propagate, and """THE MESSAGE"""".

And that Tolkien lore has no place in the game. Such a weak cash grab. Belittles them both.

Right. I think the bigger problem is that Tolkien doesn't belong in Magic the Gathering.

Honestly, they lost me the day the abandoned Manna Burn.

So um. The warning is due to the monsters not being black? Or maybe it's the dog?

Full character list: https://silenthill.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Silent_Hill_2_Characters

The game consists of only 8 actual characters.

Couldn't we actually use more transparent fear mongering?

Do you want people to forget how stupid this all was?

How about we start with, which gun makers have ads with hot babes in them, and work backwards from there. Honestly since when has this been a thing to begin with?