Many many many issues here:

• Indians live almost exclusively in cities where pay is better but outgoing expenses are worse. Whites are spread throughout the country and are actually in the lowest concentrations in major cities, diminishing their standing here.
• The US doesn't generally accept poor jeet immigrants.
• This chart doesn't take into account the peanut wages that all the offshore jeet call center faggots make, which should be accounted for if they're employed by the US.
• He's using "Asian" which includes East Asians who typically out-earn pajeets. The poop thrower wages will be smaller than what's shown here.

It's the browns. Browns are worse than faggots. We have ZERO white countries left (maybe fucking Iceland?) and all our countries are far more miserable now than they've ever been with a white majority.

I think that's wishful thinking. It's used by LLMs and, despite the turbulence, has had an unfortunately successful public trading stint.

Maybe it would be good. Don't confuse the law with justice.

For sure. Prior to woke we were calling them SJWs for years. Prior to that we still knew they were faggots.

I didn't and won't. I have willpower. You jelly?

Hahah, true.

Can also argue blacks have physicality and athleticism. Jeets have literally no good attributes.

Nobody needs indians. Indians don't need indians. Indians are anthropomorphized rat swarms.

I especially love one of the comments (edited for grammar):

And if it weren't for whites you'd just be some broodmare in India covered in shit.

Keep us updated. Interesting to hear how that dynamic plays out...

Oh, my bad. Reading comprehension fail.

Why? Fuck jews and muslims.

Man, this is the corporate endgame for people right here.

"Every feeling you have is something you should act on, and acting on all your feelings makes you a good person, including buying our merchandise." This is how you cultivate an endless flock of brainless consumers with zero willpower, ambition, or willingness to put energy into thinking. Make them as lazy and hedonistic as possible, insulate them against retaliation for being useless lazy animals by labeling detractors as extreme right wing, and reward them with left-wing virtue signal hero complex points. They will keep spending and consuming and raging against accountability.

Which, based on jeet general behaviours, is less a rule and more complete fiction.

As someone who lives in Ontario, I completely reject when people say that. Sikhs are no different from other jeets except they look more stupid.

If you walk at all in the UK, then by definition you walk near muslims.

To me, it's an admission of hostile possession and should be criminally investigated. I wonder if the natives will use land acknowledgments to sue.

I'd also recommend tools and preserves, but this is a good list.

Taxes would be lower, wages would be higher, violent crime would down by an order of magnitude, quality of life would improve, and all civil standards would improve. But no because racism.

Based on the risk alone this would probably be the stupidest thing ever done.

Oh look, another past-it bitch rocking the ventriloquist dummy look. As though anyone with a brain is going to give a shit what an animated mess of silicone and botox thinks about anything.

Just remembered I actually listened to half of a Rogan podcast with her once where her only memorable personality trait was alcoholic.

Asthma is causing climate change that causes sweeteners and preservatives. You moron chud.

I agree with many of the responses here, but at the same time, these multi-hundred-billion dollar systems were designed to be social engineering tools that undermine regular people.

We're at the point right now where the top search engine results are all "AI" slop instead of factual references. This means it's getting more and more time-consuming to tease out what's real and what's fake. At some point, we may be past some AI event horizon and be completely unable to discern what's fabricated and what's real by ourselves in a reasonable amount of time. In a situation like that, should LLMs not be held responsible for their suggestions?

Somewhat of an aside, but whatever you may think of AI and LLMs, their intended purpose is to make obsolete and remove what tiny power and influence the little people have in corporations and re-concentrate it in the elites in charge. I'm not thrilled at the idea of absolving them of liability.

I agree, which is why I brought up Bari Weiss doing that.