That pushes things over the line, if you take him at his word.
I assume he's just posturing, but if someone, such as the white people he's targeting, felt differently...well, things get spicy. If he's not arrested for terroristic threats/calls to violence, it leaves people in an interesting situation.
They really don't want to just let us have sane law and order, do they? The rate things are going, and I'm not just talking this clip, vigilantism will become more widespread, and it would be understandable. Not good, but understandable.
"...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government".
We're in charge, not them. If they insist on continuing to tread, it's literally our duty to stop them. As laid out by the Founders.
If someone said something like that about my family, I'd do things to him that would render him both harmless and a great example of why you don't threaten people.
Random hole digging is good exercise, it's probably good to put into your routine semi-regularly.
You never know when you might need those muscles, or for it to be common knowledge that it's not unusual for you to dig perfectly harmless holes sometimes.
Maybe he should go to Africa and find the African family that captured his ancestors and sold them into slavery in the first place
Why would he be upset at that white family anyway? Never mind the fact that the family didn’t do anything to him personally. His attitude is obviously retarded for that reason alone. But also, if his ancestors hadn’t been brought here as slaves, he would be living in Africa right now. Would he actually prefer that? I’m guessing he would not. That’s why he’s still living here.
It's just a memetic mutation of a crytographic term like "youths", "young scholars", or "Men With German Citizenship", things that obviously mean one thing, but are purposefully constructed by propagandists to sound like another. Jogger is just another such term, at least in my view of the term. It may originate with Ahmaud, but general parlence of it is just the flow of meta-critique of the journalistic propagandist class.
And who put them ON THE SLAVE SHIP? You pulled up their information? Looked into their background? How did they get to Charleston? Magic?
Anyways take your soft ass and "pull up." See what that gets you. There's a "reparations bullet" with your name on it. You're welcome to have it if you want it that badly.
Anyways take your soft ass and "pull up." See what that gets you.
Statistically speaking, probably some dead/injured white people. Attacker has the tactical advantage, and if you pull up with a gun already in your hands, that's another major advantage.
Yeah, this guy's soft. But if he actually did it, he would have the advantage, on average. Maybe he pull's up to John Wick's house, but more likely he pulls up to Normie McNormieson.
It's why crime stats are what they are. If you're not the aggressor, you're much more easily made the victim.
Provided they know the layout, the security posture, and the locations of any weapons and mobiles who know how to use them.
Sure, but realistically, how much of a “security posture” do you think this home has? It’s probably about 50/50 on if they have guns at all, and then even if they do the question becomes whether the guns are accessible in an emergency, or if they’re in a gun safe in the basement. And even then, if we say “they have guns, and the guns are reasonably accessible,” we have to ask how fast they’ll go for them. When they see an angry looking black man approaching holding a gun, sure, but what if he keeps his gun hidden and rings the doorbell like a normal visitor?
You’re talking like this is a tactically hardened target, when it’s much more likely a normal family home inhabited by people that shouldn’t—do, apparently, but really shouldn’t and almost certainly don’t think otherwise—have any reason to expect to be uniquely targeted for a home invasion by some whackjob they don’t even know.
Absolute posturing, this moron has no clue who bought his family and who their actual relatives are 200-300 years later, let alone where any of those descendants live.
The first clue is that he's using Zillow. That's some deep research right there, this man is a a scholar for sure. As everyone knows, Zillow has a secret search function that lets you look up all house owners in the country by name. Not.
Maybe if the geriatrics on the right actually understood tech and how it works it wouldn't have been captured by the left? At the very least clickbait fear mongering like this gem wouldn't get the time of day. Congrats on being idiots y'all. Learn how to use technology before it's too late.
Ah yes. He was never a slave but he has convinced himself that he has it worse than slaves did. Is he going to go to Africa and go after the descendants of those who sold his ancestors?? Best thing he can be told is to shut up you aren’t a slave so move on with your life. Otherwise pretty much everyone on earth can have some grievance for their ancestors
Amazing that he's laughing how they went from slave owners to broke in the last 160 years. But never thinks that if it had little bearing on their current success, it barely mattered to his own prospects anymore either.
Any interest in searching who are the descendants of the blacks who captured and sold your ancestors into slavery? The special people who did the slave trade across the Atlantic? No? Just 'White people bad''?
"One day I will."
That pushes things over the line, if you take him at his word.
I assume he's just posturing, but if someone, such as the white people he's targeting, felt differently...well, things get spicy. If he's not arrested for terroristic threats/calls to violence, it leaves people in an interesting situation.
They really don't want to just let us have sane law and order, do they? The rate things are going, and I'm not just talking this clip, vigilantism will become more widespread, and it would be understandable. Not good, but understandable.
And necessary.
If they won't allow another out, yes.
The principle is literally foundational.
"...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government".
We're in charge, not them. If they insist on continuing to tread, it's literally our duty to stop them. As laid out by the Founders.
Imagine asking for permission to remain alive, holy fucking shit.
Way to miss the very basic phrasing.
If they don't allow us a better option, we stop them by any means necessary.
We allow them offramps other than the last one.
You’re still psychologically captured. You can’t be saved.
You will never do this. Stop LARPing.
Ironic, coming from one of the biggest Internet Tough Guys here.
Take a fucking chill pill. You're so eager to be edgy you're completely missing everything.
You don’t really know what that word means.
You have no justification for that belief. I really don’t think you know anything about what you’re discussing.
Said the “white will totally fight back one day just you wait and see” guy.
Don’t use words if you don’t know what they mean. It’s embarrassing.
So many things you can’t list a single one, right?
This was the biggest blackpill for me. When offered a chance to die on their feet or live on their knees, how many chose to die on their knees.
If someone said something like that about my family, I'd do things to him that would render him both harmless and a great example of why you don't threaten people.
What do you mean? You've never seen this man in your life, and the recent shoveling you've done is completely unrelated to anything.
Random hole digging is good exercise, it's probably good to put into your routine semi-regularly.
You never know when you might need those muscles, or for it to be common knowledge that it's not unusual for you to dig perfectly harmless holes sometimes.
Now I need to hear Tom Jones singing this.
Haha, I tried to generate some AI slop for you, but they just couldn't do it justice and it just highlighted my own typo instead.
Objectively good. Intimately understandable.
Maybe it would be good. Don't confuse the law with justice.
Why not good?
https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1986154804679225538
Color me shocked that Matt Walsh isn't encouraging the 2025 joggers to take up their beefs with the ancestors of the slave ship & slave market owners.
Oy vey
Yall literally find any reason to complain. Starting to remind me of hoteps
Joggers isn't an autofilter from niggers is it?
EDIT- Nope, good!
Not sure of the OG origin of the term.
But I always relate it to the death of Ahmaud Arbery.
I'm pretty sure that is where it originates.
It's just a memetic mutation of a crytographic term like "youths", "young scholars", or "Men With German Citizenship", things that obviously mean one thing, but are purposefully constructed by propagandists to sound like another. Jogger is just another such term, at least in my view of the term. It may originate with Ahmaud, but general parlence of it is just the flow of meta-critique of the journalistic propagandist class.
Yeah that sounds right.
Because he has accomplished nothing in his life and his bloodline has accomplished nothing in 150 years.
And who put them ON THE SLAVE SHIP? You pulled up their information? Looked into their background? How did they get to Charleston? Magic?
Anyways take your soft ass and "pull up." See what that gets you. There's a "reparations bullet" with your name on it. You're welcome to have it if you want it that badly.
Statistically speaking, probably some dead/injured white people. Attacker has the tactical advantage, and if you pull up with a gun already in your hands, that's another major advantage.
Yeah, this guy's soft. But if he actually did it, he would have the advantage, on average. Maybe he pull's up to John Wick's house, but more likely he pulls up to Normie McNormieson.
It's why crime stats are what they are. If you're not the aggressor, you're much more easily made the victim.
Provided they know the layout, the security posture, and the locations of any weapons and mobiles who know how to use them.
Saying you're going to "pull up" generally implies you have none of those things.
Yea, there's crime in some areas, and not in others. This isn't an evenly distributed problem.
“Refugees welcome”
Sure, but realistically, how much of a “security posture” do you think this home has? It’s probably about 50/50 on if they have guns at all, and then even if they do the question becomes whether the guns are accessible in an emergency, or if they’re in a gun safe in the basement. And even then, if we say “they have guns, and the guns are reasonably accessible,” we have to ask how fast they’ll go for them. When they see an angry looking black man approaching holding a gun, sure, but what if he keeps his gun hidden and rings the doorbell like a normal visitor?
You’re talking like this is a tactically hardened target, when it’s much more likely a normal family home inhabited by people that shouldn’t—do, apparently, but really shouldn’t and almost certainly don’t think otherwise—have any reason to expect to be uniquely targeted for a home invasion by some whackjob they don’t even know.
Ah yes, this must be a "Nigger moment" spoken of in the Ancient Records.
The Boondocks? Damn, haven't thought about that show in ages.
It and the memes from it have never stopped being relevant and topical, some are even more so than they were then.
is literally all you need somedays to just brush all this stress off and let go of things that don't matter.
Lmao I reference it in real life all the time. It's poignant.
Absolute posturing, this moron has no clue who bought his family and who their actual relatives are 200-300 years later, let alone where any of those descendants live.
The first clue is that he's using Zillow. That's some deep research right there, this man is a a scholar for sure. As everyone knows, Zillow has a secret search function that lets you look up all house owners in the country by name. Not.
Maybe if the geriatrics on the right actually understood tech and how it works it wouldn't have been captured by the left? At the very least clickbait fear mongering like this gem wouldn't get the time of day. Congrats on being idiots y'all. Learn how to use technology before it's too late.
lol he’s gonna get nailed for a hate crime on some jewish family
Send him back to the Africans who sold his ancestors to them then.
Ah yes. He was never a slave but he has convinced himself that he has it worse than slaves did. Is he going to go to Africa and go after the descendants of those who sold his ancestors?? Best thing he can be told is to shut up you aren’t a slave so move on with your life. Otherwise pretty much everyone on earth can have some grievance for their ancestors
Amazing that he's laughing how they went from slave owners to broke in the last 160 years. But never thinks that if it had little bearing on their current success, it barely mattered to his own prospects anymore either.
That’s too much thinking for his victim minded brain
Antisemitic
Any interest in searching who are the descendants of the blacks who captured and sold your ancestors into slavery? The special people who did the slave trade across the Atlantic? No? Just 'White people bad''?
Go figure.
Throw him in jail for terroristic threats.
He didn't mean Caucasian, he meant wight.
Oh well. Doesn’t matter.
(((White))) family
“how u broke and u had slaves?”
They were probably as lazy as they are now
They sound so knowledgeable and wise. They're clearly men of the world. And they don't sound anything at all like DNC plantation workers.