I agree with many of the responses here, but at the same time, these multi-hundred-billion dollar systems were designed to be social engineering tools that undermine regular people.
We're at the point right now where the top search engine results are all "AI" slop instead of factual references. This means it's getting more and more time-consuming to tease out what's real and what's fake. At some point, we may be past some AI event horizon and be completely unable to discern what's fabricated and what's real by ourselves in a reasonable amount of time. In a situation like that, should LLMs not be held responsible for their suggestions?
Somewhat of an aside, but whatever you may think of AI and LLMs, their intended purpose is to make obsolete and remove what tiny power and influence the little people have in corporations and re-concentrate it in the elites in charge. I'm not thrilled at the idea of absolving them of liability.
I agree with many of the responses here, but at the same time, these multi-hundred-billion dollar systems were designed to be social engineering tools that undermine regular people.
We're at the point right now where the top search engine results are all "AI" slop instead of factual references. This means it's getting more and more time-consuming to tease out what's real and what's fake. At some point, we may be past some AI event horizon and be completely unable to discern what's fabricated and what's real by ourselves in a reasonable amount of time. In a situation like that, should LLMs not be held responsible for their suggestions?
Somewhat of an aside, but whatever you may think of AI and LLMs, their intended purpose is to make obsolete and remove what tiny power and influence the little people have in corporations and re-concentrate it in the elites in charge. I'm not thrilled at the idea of absolving them of liability.