13
Guy_Incognito76 13 points ago +13 / -0

You can't limit divorce terms with a prenup. All prenups that try to fix divorce terms are tossed out on the grounds they are 'coercive.' The woman will always argue that she had no choice but to sign it (which is insane, but nevermind).

You can only exclude preexisting assets from the marriage and only if the funds are never touched for the entire duration of the marriage. If you have a separate bank account and one time you use it to buy a cup of coffee, it is now community property. Only assets sealed away completely in a trust or similar vehicle can be excluded. Money you make while married will always be considered 'hers'. Even if you try to say your business had nothing to do with her, they'll say her 'support' was what made you the money and give her a cut.

The purpose of prenups was originally to protect rich heiress's from having their family fortunes stolen by handsome losers. Attempts by men to use them to limit divorce settlements are viewed very harshly by the courts.

9
Guy_Incognito76 9 points ago +9 / -0

Until somewhat recently it was church dogma that jews were damned for deicide unless they converted. The capture of Christians by "judeo-christianity" is really a huge win for them.

3
Guy_Incognito76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Non-competes have to be pretty narrowly written. They would have to show that Jared working for another company would directly harm Crowder's revenue, and since Jared isn't "Talent" that seems dubious.

7
Guy_Incognito76 7 points ago +7 / -0

Jews turned the temple into a house of thieves, so Jesus whipped them. They never forgave him for it.

2
Guy_Incognito76 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hear that so much it's ridiculous. They really think all rich people are on the right. They've never been in a conference room with 12 people who's net worth exceeds a billion dollars, eating $200/plate catered lunches, listening to a black consultant lecture them on what racist pieces of shit they are.

2
Guy_Incognito76 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not complicated. The way you get famous as a woman on the internet is to do what men do but with less clothing on.

It's a manifestation of the iron law of "Tits or GTFO." Women are generally inferior at everything so the only way to get attention is by also being hot.

A sane society wouldn't allow this, but here we are.

9
Guy_Incognito76 9 points ago +9 / -0

My wife was disgusted playing D4 because she wanted to be the druid but the only choice is hideous hambeast. She played the fat guy instead.

7
Guy_Incognito76 7 points ago +8 / -1

100% chance of god's special people being involved.

9
Guy_Incognito76 9 points ago +9 / -0

Pick a topic where the media narrative is completely false and expose it. Assuming they'll listen to you, this is very easy. Just show a picture of Joe Biden groping a kid. Boom, done. Or ask them how many black people Kyle Rittenhouse shot. Or how much Fentanyl George Floyd was on. Find something they "know" is correct and show them 100% irrefutable evidence that it's false. Once you plant the seed of distrust, nothing can stop it from growing. That's why the left tries to shut down any right-wing ideas at all. The truth is like a lion, set it free and it defends itself.

15
Guy_Incognito76 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's interesting how they're using legal arguments and intimidation. I'd prefer a squad who never says a word and just breaks all their legs.

2
Guy_Incognito76 2 points ago +2 / -0

"no u," the movement.

3
Guy_Incognito76 3 points ago +5 / -2

That southern girl is not in any way a "tomboy." She has long hair, wears makeup in every video, and flaunts her body. A tomboy is a girl who dresses like a man and hides her femininity, like the character Watts from Some Kind of Wonderful.

That chick is just doing the standard online attention whore bit of "do something men do while wearing less clothing to get famous."

21
Guy_Incognito76 21 points ago +21 / -0

They gave Alec Baldwin's character plenty of great zingers. Another example of making a 'parody' of a dumb right winger who only ends up seeming cool and based.

6
Guy_Incognito76 6 points ago +6 / -0

Historically there were a few crimes that were technically illegal but always acquitted. Killing someone in a duel, killing a man for sleeping with your wife, etc. This probably qualifies. The state would basically say "please don't pop off like this again, but we get it." That's when the state identified with the people it rules though, instead of viewing us as commodities.

6
Guy_Incognito76 6 points ago +6 / -0

The defense argument was insane though. Probably legally necessary but reading it makes my brain hurt. Something about "he went temporarily insane from trauma...". Bullshit. Guy fucked with his kid, so he made him un-alive. It's the most sane and understandable instinct a father can have.

6
Guy_Incognito76 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Why not" is the real question.

How has society gotten so cucked that this was even asked? No medieval peasant would wonder why a father would kill his son's abuser.

7
Guy_Incognito76 7 points ago +7 / -0

"The platform" you mean, people posting shit you guys did?

14
Guy_Incognito76 14 points ago +14 / -0

Generally speaking, once you get married women will do one of two things to your hobbies: 1. Invade them or 2. Destroy them. The goal is to have 100% ownership of your fun (which lets her charge any price she wants for it). It does not matter what those hobbies are. She does not care.

That's why you need to set the boundaries early. Say your game/bowling/fishing/poker time is MAN TIME ONLY. She is not allowed, you won't stop for her, and that is that. Never give a single inch.

There is no time spent doing things other than paying attention to her that a woman will not be jealous of. The only solution is to tell them tough shit and you don't care.

This is why I always tell my wife no when my idiot friends try to invite her to D&D night. She's my wife and I love her, but D&D is sacred and she does not belong there.

4
Guy_Incognito76 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shared interests is a red herring. Fuck a girl enough times and she'll think your authentic Battlestar Galactica prop collection is hot.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›