Former Crowder employees are now in revolt
(twitter.com)
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Technically it's one former employee, Not-Gay Jared, but Quarter Black Garrett has endorsed his video.
Cliffsnotes:
Doesn't sound great. It's hard to think of any legitimate reason to turn the legal guns on a former employee in this case.
The real cliff notes is it seems Jared violated the NDA trying to get some type of lawsuit against crowder using other former employees. Whether legitimate or not it’s clear that’s what sparked the lawsuit from crowder. The one thing that irks me is the “I have the receipts but I need donations” its the most used phrase by grifters in media and if he does indeed have them I would love to see, but this has big Lin Wood vibes to me.
Abuse and harassment is easily cried. Someone wasn't nice to me=abuse. If that's true, and some kinda court will have to rule that out it's def. shitty. The only thing I would object to right now without knowing what actually went down behind the scenes is the non compete. It is always a shitty thing to do to someone imho. Other than that it seems like a lot of he said she said. Better to watch from afar.
This is standard practice. Non-competes are (unfortunately) very common. I find it very unfortunate that Jared is trying to take down Crowder.
Is there any way we can contribute to Crowder?
NDAs originally were used to stop corporate espionage which was very necessary as anything with r&d could see their employees run off with the ip to other companies to make more money on their end. Like with most things they can be abused but the background behind them was extremely necessary for the economy at the time.
Non competes were for the same reason. Microsoft famously did it to Apple back in the day, just like a lot of tech companies would employee poach then make a clone while skirting NDAs because the “employee” wasn’t on the official development team.
you can generally fight them and win in court if you have the money, assuming your ex-employer compensates you fairly for the duration of the non-compete. They pay you or you are free to go work for whomever you would like.
Agreed. Generally do not like those non compete shit. You're good in one branch but your former company says you are not allowed to work in it for 1-2 years, causing you needless loss of imcome.
Non-compete seems fine if they give me severance for the entire duration.
I agree they should be illegal, but they're not.
Wasn’t Crowder bitching about how Kiked his offer from the Daily Wire was? Seems like he wasn’t treating his employees much better.
He was bitching about the monetizing policy which would have seen his show lose 30% revenue share from getting demonetized by YouTube. At least with crowder he does usually bring the receipts and trounced DW on that one and the attempted employee poaching. The mutual NDA in this one makes it murkier as neither side is showing any evidence but making claims or playing mum because of the NDA.
Non-competes have to be pretty narrowly written. They would have to show that Jared working for another company would directly harm Crowder's revenue, and since Jared isn't "Talent" that seems dubious.
That's pretty rich coming from Crowder, who openly derided Ben Shapiro, Jeremy Boreing, and the Daily Wire for giving him such a shitty contract a year or two ago, and warning other "right wingers" to avoid such toxically bad contracts in the future.
I was on Crowder's side during that debacle, but it now looks like it was just controlled opposition assholes fighting each other.
We only heard from the side of the employee with an axe to grind. Wait until we get the actual facts, or at least Crowder's side, before forming an opinion.
That's fair. However, as I pointed out in another comment (and many other comments previously), pretty much the entire mainstream right wing is a false choice trap. There are malicious actors, those driven by money to play along, and useful idiots who still buy the propaganda. No matter the reason, the results are the same. It would be wiser and safer to assume everyone that's made it big in the mainstream right to be controlled opposition.
If you're knowledgeable about Steven Crowder, perhaps you can answer something for me. Does he discuss jewish over representation in every societal aspect that's hurting us? Does he discuss false history and the true history that's being hidden from us? Does he discuss racial differences?
Those are the 3 main verboten topics both the left and right censor to keep people controlled. There are obvious differences in rhetoric/propaganda on the left and right to keep the people controlled. However, they both censor these 3 topics, so no matter who is in power, White people never collective, and the Kalergi plan continues unabated. Right wing normies also respond exactly the same as useful idiot lefties when confronted with these topics, and use the exact same language and "arguments" in refutation, and names to call anyone who espouses them.
This ultimately boils down to one simple philosophical concept: do they prioritize truth over all else, no matter how uncomfortable it is, no matter how much they're punished for speaking it, no matter how much they have to sacrifice to pursue it. If someone places anything else over truth, it means that, ultimately, they're not your friend, and will fail in one way or another, and bring down everyone who follows them with them. One may argue the veracity of the above 3 topics, but if one never even broaches the topic, especially with how blatant the lies have become, it probably means they're malicious, greedy, or a useful idiot.
Well, I'm not the most knowledgeable about everything he's covered on his show. I don't recall him specifically pointing out the Jewish overrepresentation, but I do remember him pointing out, repeatedly, the incredible harm that unmitigated immigration does to the US. He's often cited the yearly costs, often compared it to the proportionally minor costs of proper border control and of building a wall, and often pointed out all the problems that come from granting illegal aliens housing, the right to vote, and citizenship. That right there is a big part of the Jewish plan for the masses that he's arguing against.
He's also been one of the best at pointing out all the evidence that the 2020 election was won by the democrats only through voter fraud. He's made effort to personally verify the addresses of many of the votes, and confirmed that a significant portion of them don't even exist, proving that they were fraudulent. He's often spoken about the lack of signature matches, and of efforts by various States to make signature verification illegal.
By "true history that's been hidden from us", you'll have to be more specific. What about, exactly? The Holocaust? The Civil War? Slavery? I'm not sure what you mean.
I do believe that I've heard him talk about the disparate results for various races, though. He's often mentioned the difference between equity and equality, the importance of laws being applied equally to everyone, and the statistics for "hate crimes" and police shootings by race. He's had the Hodge Twins on his show, and they've often spoken about how black people act in their communities.
So all in all, although I don't recall him specifically calling out Jews, and I personally disagree with him on a few topics, he's probably still been one of the better political commentators out there.
Thanks for the response and clarification to Crowder's positions. Like you said, he's definitely better than most in the mainstream right wing, but, as I've said, that's not high praise, and it's not good enough. Doing the same thing, over and over and over, and expecting a different result is insanity. Mainstream right wingers, in politics and media, continually advocate positions and policies which fail, and yet, the regular people who follow and support the mainstream right wing continually support and vote for these people.
I'm glad Crowder at least brings up racial differences in his show. Still, from what you mentioned, and how he puts it into context, it seems he's still following the mainstream right wing's view on what a nation is. He thinks a nation is completely detached from its people/race, that it's just a gilded cage economic zone, that the best measure of success for a nation is if the GDP and stock market go up, that all racial differences are "socio-economic" factors.
It's all a lie. The root words for "nation" comes from Latin and French, literally translating to family, children, people, ancestry, progeny, race, etc. Our ancestors knew that a nation is derived from its people. There's no such thing as magic dirt. You can't transplant a unique people from one place to another and expect them to act completely differently.
This is why the mainstream right wing is a false choice trap (meant exclusively for White people). Every single election proves that only White people collectively and in majority vote right wing. And yet, the mainstream right wing, both in politics and media, never advocates for White collective interests. It's always vague platitudes detached from the reality that Western nations are White nations. This is why when mainstream right wingers gain political power they don't stop open borders or mass immigration, they don't stop the Kalergi plan (the active replacement and genocide of White people in every Western nation on earth). The right manipulates their useful idiots into thinking "it's fine so long as it's legal". Legal non-white immigration is just as detrimental to White people as illegal non-white immigration. It all leads to the same outcome: the Kalergi plan. In fact, the mainstream right wingers actively acknowledge that the Kalergi plan is happening, and instead of stopping it, they try to gaslight us that we must have "big tent" politics and policies, to try and attract non-white votes, which never, ever pans out. They also decry the left as "the real racists", manipulating us further into thinking that being racist is the greatest sin.
Every other race is granted basic human rights, the ability to have their own homes and nations, to protect their borders and control who enters, to associate with whom they choose, to collectivize, to advocate and espouse for their collective interests, and to protect themselves (violently if necessary) from harmful ideas, institutions, individuals, or organizations that threaten the collective. These aren't just requirements for a nation and people to exist, but for all life to exist. They're fundamental rights, which is why our Founding Fathers (and similar philosophers) have said their "God given" rights. Without those rights, the people, the lifeforms cease to exist, which is precisely why it's being denied to White people, because the people in power are actively trying to kill all of us. And yet, the mainstream right wing enables it to happen, actively gaslights people to accept it, traps people into their own propaganda, preventing people from realizing the totality of truth, and attacks anyone who dares to stray out of their programming.
You asked specifically what false history we're taught. Yes, WW2 is a large part of it. Most of what we're taught about WW2 is a straight up lie. Most of what we're taught about slavery and the Civil War is a lie, or gross manipulation, as well. It's all used to manipulate White people into feeling guilty about what our ancestors did, to guilt us into not seeing race, to guilt us into not collectivizing for our ethnic interests, even if it means we'll die by not doing it. The history we're taught is used as a bludgeon against White people, and it's reinforced by identical propaganda and lies put out by Hollywood, which is why Hollywood makes so many films and TV shows about the Civil War, slavery, WW2, and the Holocaust. Propaganda has to be continually reinforced, otherwise people begin to question and break free, because reality itself destroys lies. White people weren't the only ones guilty of slavery, but yet we're the only ones told to feel perpetually guilty for it. White people weren't the only ones guilty of horrific wars, but yet we're the only ones told to feel perpetually guilty for it. White people aren't the only ones whose ancestors did bad things, yet we're the only ones told to feel guilty for it. No other race is told to feel collective guilty for past crimes we didn't commit.
The mainstream right wing goes along with these historical lies, and couch it in unique propaganda to the right. "The allies were the good guys." "The Democrats are the real racists." "I stand with our military and police." "Israel is our greatest ally." The propaganda and messaging is unique to the left and right, but the result is the same.
The mainstream right wing also advocates for policies that perpetually fail. They always talk big, but almost never do anything to fix stuff they bitch about. Voter fraud? Better have a new investigation that leads to no arrests or changes. Pharma fraud? Covid scam? Same. Open borders and mass immigration? Same (better yet, transport the illegals further into the country to "own the libs"). Another war started over false flags and lies? Same (gotta keep the military industrial complex running so the politicians can get more kick backs). New offshoots start up, from people disgusted by the mainstream right wing, and they eventually get infiltrated and swallowed by the mainstream right wing. This happened to the Tea party and the MAGA movement.
The mainstream right wing, even though it labels itself as "conservative", has conserved nothing for the last several decades. They have abdicated, acquiesced, compromised, and surrendered on every single issue. Marriage, no fault divorce, gender differences (the woman is the mother and home maker and the man is the protector and provider), gay marriage, LGBTQ, transgenderism, race/gender quotas, affirmative action, etc. Give it 5-10 years, and the mainstream right wing will be vociferous advocates for pedophilia, and decrying "the left are the real pedophobes".
If the mainstream right wing adopts every single position, policy, and idea of the openly globalist left, if every single policy they push fails, than at some point, a rational person must realize that, at the minimum, they're a failed outlet, and more accurately, are controlled opposition, a false choice trap.
This hypocrisy of the mainstream right also comes in the form of "vote harder [current year]", no matter how bad things get, no matter how corrupt our institutions become, no matter how much we're hurt and killed. Our ancestors would've revolted decades ago and killed all the people responsible. And yet, the mainstream right wing, hilariously, advocates for perpetual peace, while simultaneously and proudly decrying their support for the military and police, which fundamentally use violence to solve problems. We're constantly gaslit that if anyone wants to organize or stop the people in power outside the blatantly corrupt institutions that are fucking us over, we're "feds" and "glowies", while living in nations founded on our ancestors doing great violence to create them.
In every conceivable metric, the mainstream right wing isn't good enough. They're actively harmful to White people. They can't be trusted, shouldn't be listened to, and shouldn't be voted for. A traitor in your midst is more dangerous than an entire army at the gates, and thus traitors should be dealt with more harshly. And yet, these fuckers are opening the gates, and keeping them open, to the invading armies, and gaslighting us into accepting it.
Crowder may be better than most in the mainstream right wing, but he's not good enough. If the leaders you follow continually fail, figure out why, and find new leaders.
All media people are grifters. Every single one.
When it becomes your job, the money takes precedence.
A good man can prioritize truth over money. That doesn't mean a good man must make no money, but when a "good" man prioritizes making money over telling the truth, then yes, they're (at minimum) a grifter, but more accurately a liar, and should've be believed or listened to by actual good men. But, yes, pretty much everyone in the mainstream right wing is a false choice trap.
eh, I'm more inclined to lean towards Crowders side if that's the case. The guy platformed alex jones at the height of the sandy hook scandal, when he got deplatformed by everyone and people basically refused to talk to him anymore, including some he thought were friends.
There was basically no long term financial incentive to do so
There's a really simple rule to figure out if a politician or political pundit is actually on your side. Do they know about and discuss the verboten topics both the left and right censor? If so, they're not on your side. This could mean they're maliciously involved, or keeping quiet for money, or a useful idiot who still buys the propaganda, but no matter the reason, the results are the same. They're a mouthpiece for the people in power.
Maybe they just don't want to die. They could secretly be on your side but unless they occasionally drop hints the result is the same.
That's just as much of a cop out as greed. Ultimately, if your enemy is going to kill you, regardless of what you do, then it's better to fight than to remain perpetually peaceful.
By your own reasoning, no army in existence would fight, for anything, because the individual is afraid he might die. While this may be true, that individuals may die, it denies the fundamental truth of the collective, that the collective will live, that sacrifices are necessary for the collective to continue. Individualism and collectivism, by themselves, are destructive, because pursuing one by itself robs the other. The truth is in the middle. Every single people, nation, group, and life form in existence groups up (collectivizes) in one form or another to pursue collective interests. The first and most important reason to group up is for mutual survival. If a life form is incapable of pursuing its own survival, it doesn't deserve to exist, and will eventually die out.
This is precisely why White people are being denied our basic human rights, like the right to have our own homes and nations, the right to protect our own borders, the right to control who enters, the right to associate with whom we choose, the right to collective, the right to espouse for our ethnic interests, and the right to defend ourselves. We're being brainwashed, by the left and right, that White people can't collectivize, otherwise that would make us "racists" and "Nazis". They use the exact same language and arguments, centered around the exact same lies.
That's not good enough. It may have been in the 70s or 80s, when the propaganda and maliciousness was more subtle, but not any more. The only way to defeat lies is to tell the truth. There are zero exception to this. If good men remain silent in the face of lies, they're not truly good men. If good men remain complacent in the face of evil, they're not truly good men. There are zero exceptions to this. Saying otherwise is a coping mechanism, trying to still believe we're "good" men by letting lies and evil persist in our midst while we have the power to resist and stop them.
We're being actively replaced and genocided by people in power that hate us, who have infiltrated and corrupted every institution in every White Western nation, propagandizing our people and children against our collective interests, gaslighting us to remain perpetually peaceful, atomized, brainwashed, stupid, poisoned, fat, apathetic, and weak, to tell us to continue to vote for people that don't reverse the damage, offer us political parties and leaders who always betray us and/or don't go far enough, to tell us to continue to use the corrupted institutions as the only means of fixing what's wrong.
Continuing to go along as if everything's normal, continuing to pursue the same failed "solutions", isn't just stupid, it's suicidally stupid, and not just for each individual, but collectively, as a whole.
Espouse the truth, defend truth, and act in truth, or die. There are no other options.
Must be an election year.
Edited after TDLR
Sounds bad but I've been overloaded by Vtuber agency news that this isn't the worst former employer behaviour I've heard THIS WEEK.
Just settle it in court as I can't be bothered with this social media bitching that happens a lot.
See my comment
I'm conspiratorial enough to believe the timing of this coinciding with the flak Daily Wire is getting is not a coincidence.
Yes, but more importantly for why they fired her.
well, if you believe that, you have to consider the first controversy only got big because they covered it first too
Yes. Exactly.
Candace is apparently still aiming for him. Its pretty personal for her it seems and i dont think shes thinking about this logically and just has some grudge against him
I say this because even when he broke the nashville transcript story, she took pot shots at him and said she would reveal the FULL story. I watched her video and she revealed fucking nothing so that says a lot
What is going on here lol? Haven't watched Crowder in about 2 1/2 years, and it's all seemingly collapsed since.
Not really. Subs still there, and they're arguably bigger than they were 2 years ago since they got other people under some crowder mug club umbrella now , much like dw used to be.
Best and most realistic guess is crowder is a very strict taskmaster and comes off harsh to people around him. That's bad for personal relationships but if you're building a business, it's a very good trait to have
https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1772785668827029914?t=p9nrHSU0focdxtFVxW6qFw&s=19
Supposedly the court documents
Wherever you are on this topic that's a brilliantly nuanced opening of poetic beauty.
Crowder really started to suck shit around the time Not Gay Jared left. I’m not saying he made the show or anything but I think it definitely marked a shift into the more bland, overly regimented affair the show would become.
It was more comedy when not gay jared was on but more political when he left
Yeah, Crowder constantly referring to him as “not-gay jarred” just came off as a high school bully, not funny at all.
I'm thrilled that right-wingers can't run companies.
Lol I like how yall all spouted off as if this fag hasn't been a lolcow for years. Clearly he was telling the truth