I'll defend John Rabe's honour, but fuck this shit. Rabe was a good man because he saved hundreds of thousands of civilians from a rampaging death cult, while this guy is being defended because because Nazism in Ukraine is inconvenient to the neoliberal project.
Regulating broadcasts is only justified by the technical limitations of broadcasting: namely, that there's only so much spectrum to go around, so you must license out slots so they don't overlap and get reduced to gibberish. Nothing on the internet broadcasts once you get past the node level (i.e. sending data to all your neighbours as you try to find an efficient path to the eventual recipient), so nothing on the internet can legitimately be regulated as a broadcast.
Based on that article, calling her a freak is retarded. Even assuming she wasn't groomed and the teacher wasn't abusing his position of authority, he had a duty to refrain from having sex with the students, because teenagers are dumb and he was old enough to know that.
You're watching a video about Tinder being scum and profiting off of selling false hope, and YouTube recommended a video about Tinder being scum and profiting off selling false hope. That's what the algorithm should be recommending.
I'm not a tech guru, but if you are constantly deleting things from that hard drive, then I believe it does impact the "life span" of the hard drive.
That's more an issue for SSDs than HDDs, I believe. A hard drive is a mechanical system that will fail eventually, but individual memory locations don't have their own write cycle limits.
They're not being hunted, but they do disproportionately commit suicide-by-john. Black transsexuals are more likely to become prostitutes, and the men they're propositioning are more likely to kill them for this insult to their honour.
Even if he wasn't lying about his alcohol abuse, it's not why Americans think the economy is terrible. If you're buying individual shots of whiskey at an airport restaurant you're obviously way less price-conscious than the rest of us - you know they're going to be paying a premium lease for the location, and passing those costs onto you.
My answer: because the current Ukrainian regime is the product of an anti-democratic riot that installed Kiev's and the U.S. State Department's preferred candidate as interim leader over the democratically elected pro-Russia, ethnic Russian Yanukovich. Since that time they have not had a single election that included the winners of their last free election (the eastern provinces' departure from the democratic process is a direct reaction to Kiev's refusal to let them win a fair election), have declared two out of three presidents to be traitors against the post-revolution regime, and have waged war against the winners of the last free election to prevent them being a Taiwan-style rump state of the previous Ukrainian regime. The current regime possesses neither a democratic nor a moral mandate.
The current Ukrainian regime is the brainchild of two groups, both of which I oppose. Obama's State Department's fantasies of reversing the domino theory are insane, meaning toppling Russia's allies one by one until they could do the same to Russia, while an intelligence officer leading a nuclear superpower just sits there and waits as they lower the noose around his neck. And a precedent that the population of the capital city should possess a rioter's veto over any election is an existential threat to conservatism in many countries, whose capitals attract leftists like crumbs attract cockroaches.
I will now read the article to see what bullshit they are claiming.