Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

29
Trudeau Government moves to regulate podcasts (archive.ph)
posted 2 years ago by YesMovement 2 years ago by YesMovement +29 / -0
24 comments share
24 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (24)
sorted by:
▲ 17 ▼
– deleted 17 points 2 years ago +17 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– Ender910 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

I think a lot of it goes further than that. They're prepping for inevitable economic catastrophes, that they helped to set the foundation for (either through inept incompetence or deliberate malice).

And they've been moving all the pieces on the board quite plainly for a few years now, leading up to these next few even more blatant and predictable moves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Ender910 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I agree, it is curious that they're deliberately naming podcasts. I don't know if they somehow think that sounds less threatening or if they're being accidentally transparent about who they intend to target.

I suppose one "advantage" in targeting Podcasts specifically is that it covers both uploaded media and streaming in one go, and content that typically focuses more on talking points than entertainment.

And it goes with Canada's active playbook of trying to close in on news media that doesn't completely cave into the government's agenda. And does so without explicitly stating that they're going after "unsanctioned" news outlets.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Assassin47 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

the boomers have finally caught on to the fact that everything is going online now and television is largely irrelevant

Does this mean we can finally stop hearing about Fox News and how all those right-wingers listening to Faux News are destroying America?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– acp_k2win 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

Can't have any channels that aren't controlled by the regime

Back in the 90s the gay commies of that era hated "talk radio". That was the only broadcast channel not controlled by them and it was where conservative content thrived. Because, surprise, people who commuted to work in the morning tended to lean more conservative.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Even talk radio is all cucked up here in 2023.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Vaako23 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Guess the companies could just move to the US then. Unless Trudeau also tries to build a great firewall. But I think that would even upset a lot of the sheep still voting for him

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TerpenoidTester 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

The government claims the regulation will “ensure online streaming services make meaningful contributions to Canadian and Indigenous content.”

Wait, that is their rationale? That is the dumbest shit I've ever seen in my life, even from the Nazis in the North.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Ender910 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

The worst impact these feeble efforts might have is to demonetize Podcasters who reside in Canada, and maybe block/target anyone they find is donating to "naughty" non-Canadian podcasters.

Also, they'll of course try to target some of the bigger names who have contracts with larger podcasting companies.

Really retarded and does suck for those who'd be impacted, but it is hilarious if these rejects actually think their efforts will do much to clamp down on what amounts to large audio files that can be uploaded almost anywhere.

Edit: Took a second look, realized how off some of my information was. It's specifically targeting big names and hosting/streaming services. So their real goals are more about trying to control and censor those companies and their content. Which is both more dangerous and weaker at the same time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Grumman 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Regulating broadcasts is only justified by the technical limitations of broadcasting: namely, that there's only so much spectrum to go around, so you must license out slots so they don't overlap and get reduced to gibberish. Nothing on the internet broadcasts once you get past the node level (i.e. sending data to all your neighbours as you try to find an efficient path to the eventual recipient), so nothing on the internet can legitimately be regulated as a broadcast.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Assassin47 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Regulating broadcasts is only justified by the technical limitations of broadcasting: namely, that there's only so much spectrum to go around, so you must license out slots so they don't overlap and get reduced to gibberish.

Is that even necessary? We tolerate it now, but there was a Free For All period in the past. I wonder if the market would solve spectrum allocation better - OR in areas where every frequency sounds like an annoying CB radio channel, people would do something more productive like read a book. The case is stronger for emergency spectrum reservations and ATC. That can also be done at the state level with interstate agreements. Feds don't need to be involved.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Grumman 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

The free-for-all ended in 1912 with the Radio Act. It didn't survive until the first commercial radio station, let alone today where two-way wireless channels are ubiquitous.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kiaatikea 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

When even a feminazi like Atwood bitches about your bs, Trudeau is getting the boot sooner or later

permalink save report block reply
▲ 28 ▼
– deleted 28 points 2 years ago +28 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Yeah, but the point is to fight in places you can win. Canada, the UK, Australia, etc, are all fucked beyond fixing at this point, short of outright civil war and hanging every leftist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– TeeBP 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

They'll either have a civil war or genocide at the rate things are going.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

it's already in the effective early stages, erasing everything white people have done in favor of dindus and sand people. Portraying white people as evil.

Man, if only they didn't give up their guns...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HusbandsLead 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I got out of Canada in 2021, and will certainly blast this garbage law on my podcast.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I think he's really only a Canadian in name only at this point. Like most that achieve success.

I saw him tweet this week that he's touring Europe.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy