by Lethn
6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

clients are strictly prohibited from engaging in any violent actions against them.

That makes sense. It's a more PR-friendly way of saying "Don't break our stuff, jackass!"

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

To a reasonable person, "hot coffee" means "ready to drink." It does not mean "if you drink this, you'll die."

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

more questioning the guy that went 'I know it's another animals milk but I'm gonna try it'

The Mongols used to do it - when all you have is grass, sheep's and horse's milk are some of the few sources of food fit for human consumption.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +4 / -0

If all cops were bastards, the far left wouldn't be saying it. Their complaint is that not enough cops are bastards, and there are still some who will put a bullet in a violent Democrat rather than standing by to hold their victims down as they have their way with the community.

24
Grumman 24 points ago +24 / -0

These aren't normies. These are cultists holed up in left-wing enclaves.

10
Grumman 10 points ago +10 / -0

If it's gay for a man to be with a trans woman, that means it's straight to be with a trans man. Ask him if he'd be comfortable fucking a dude with a vagina, he'll change his mind real quick.

That's not a dude with a vagina, that's a woman with a mental disorder. That's already covered under the "Don't stick your dick in the crazy" rule.

7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

The point at which this stops being naivety and becomes treasonous money laundering is well before the point where the recipients record propaganda videos of them repurposing foreign aid to build rocket artillery.

8
Grumman 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's an overgeneralisation. Some bombs don't leave craters because they're designed to airburst for greater effectiveness against soft targets, while others others are specifically designed to cause craters, like anti-runway bombs.

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think this is stupid from the premise that EVERYONE should have the ability to purchase and carry REAL weapons whether that's guns, swords, a tank etc

Children shouldn't. And if you're carrying a real weapon you should be keeping it holstered unless the situation means it would be justifiable to shoot something.

10
Grumman 10 points ago +10 / -0

I agree. The worst you can say is that he wasn't blackpilled enough to think the FBI was complicit.

7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oh, when Duterte does it it's a crime against humanity, but when leftists do it it's okay?

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're in a thread about how we're supposed to believe the Socialist Workers Party as they defend the honour of Islamic terrorists.

11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

Your argument is retarded.

  1. If an inbred zealot builds a rocket out of substandard materials and it misfires, and then he does it again, the same act having the same outcome isn't evidence that it's being made up.

  2. Jeremy Corbyn and his commie fucks don't say things like this because they're true, they say it because he's a traitor who never met an enemy of Britain he didn't like.

  3. On top of all that, we had the same thing happen in Ukraine recently. Are you going to pretend that those Polish farmers weren't killed by a Ukrainian S-300 too, or do you have to be an Islamic terrorist to get the benefit of the doubt?

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because every single foreigner who works in the Gaza Strip is a terrorist sympathiser.

11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

At no point did anyone suggest looking at Aboriginal culture as a way of improving their population outcomes.

Which is the elephant in the room no matter which direction you're coming from. If you look at the specific problems plaguing Aboriginal communities, most are things Aborigines are doing to other Aborigines - like rampant domestic violence. And if you look at Aboriginal culture itself, it should be no surprise that an illiterate hunter-gatherer society that was obsolete by the time the Romans conquered England does a poor job of prioritising education and employment.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, it's not. Magic: the Gathering is a massive setting spanning multiple worlds, and there's nothing inherently subversive about one of the characters being a black man. It's not the same thing as taking a specifically white character from a specifically European story and turning him black for ideological reasons.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tried to make a kid-friendly series of Warhammer 40K books(wtf?).

The problem isn't doing this, it's how. There is room for kid-friendly stories in 40k - one of my favourites is about a juve going through a coming of age trial as he is given his first pistol and sent to kill a feral rat. But that's taking advantage of the scope of the 40k universe to find a segment that is appropriate to that kind of story, instead of just giving the kids a neutered version of the main show.

15
Grumman 15 points ago +15 / -0

But it does work. It's worked for thirty years. It's incompatible with the modern postmodernist and their rejection of objective biology truth, but that's because the modern postmodernist is a crazy person.

If we were dealing with people who just liked the idea, I'd say go ahead and make a non-canon mini line for stuff like Daemon Prince Gulliman or female Space Marines. But since it's being pushed by insane iconoclasts, give them no quarter.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not genocide if an aggressive enemy refuses to stay down. Israel would be right to wipe the Gazans off the map for the same reason the United States would have been right to wipe the Japanese off the map, had the nukes not knocked some sense into them.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

As far as I can tell, he's not an Israeli citizen - he's an American citizen who did some volunteer work overseas after he left the Army.

7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

That is explicitly false:

Military service in a foreign country is not an expatriating act if service is as a soldier who is not an officer, unless the foreign military is engaged in hostilities with the United States. Further, foreign military service usually does not cause loss of nationality since an intention to relinquish nationality normally is lacking. In adjudicating loss of nationality cases, the Department has established an administrative presumption that a person serving in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities against the United States does not have the intention to relinquish nationality. One who voluntarily serves as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the military of a country not engaged in hostilities with the United States will lose one’s U.S. citizenship only if one intended to relinquish U.S. citizenship when he/she served in the armed forces of a foreign state.

Mast wasn't even serving as a soldier at the time - he was a double amputee volunteering to pack medical kits and move supplies.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

And what makes you think you can keep a libertarian government if you refuse to keep foreign agents of totalitarian regimes away from the levers of power?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›