While this does smack a little of 'Democrats are the real racists' style copium(IE, it's true, but doesn't work as an arguement), it doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
Like other said, incel-dom is less 'hatred of women' and more 'hatred of what modern society enables'. Dig deep enough, and you stop to realize that these guys would be married with families a century ago, you have to pause and consider how the flying fuck we got to this point.
...still, modern malaise and ruin aside, the real black pill is realizing that being treated like a piece of meat and a slave to be traded and tossed away at a whim by violent men is what women reward.
Something that women are desperate to deny, when men point this out. I'm sure many men have that tale of 'assholes who constantly get rewarded with beautiful women', and while you could argue selection bias, I'd respond with 'stereotypes exist for a reason'.
And people wonder why Incels can get bitter.
Yeah, there's a reason I learned very quickly not to interact with other athiests. 99.9% of their bullshit tends to come down to 'I hate you Christian dad!' by any other words. And don't go much beyond that.
Arab men actually have a serious amount of power in a relationship, so of course they're going to look forward to fatherhood - they have a social guarantee that they'll get atleast SOMETHING out of the entire fucking thing.
Whereas, in the west, we constantly play deference to women and anything ill that happens, the man is blamed for it.
People are shocked that men aren't stupid and can read the room and culture, film at 11.
Lady, you fucking wish you looked like Kashino. You'd be celebrating and whoring yourself out on OnlyFans in a fucking instant.
It's jealousy, pure and simple.
Or women who actually went into STEM after graduating, as opposed to just using it as a piece of paper to open doors.
It's something I've noted a time or two; a women who gets an engineering degree and then instantly uses it to pivot into a managerial role, as opposed to actually making shit. Makes me wonder.
The Right try to put women forward in the political arena because they're trying to deflect accusations of sexism, regardless of the woman's skills in question. (It's also fucking pointless, because thier enemy doesn't care.)
The left puts women forward in the political arena because the women in question are power-hungry-grabbing whores that would sell anything and everyone to get on top.
Never vote for a woman.
Wow. So it's that place.
Little surprise. The various left-aligned groups are starting to get a taste of what happens when you act like a conquered people.
They fall under the typical liberal faggotry assumption of 'Brown people are exotic, therefor they MUST be better!'
Remember kids - outgroup preference in liberals are a real thing, and they're the only group who express it to such a gross degree.
Nah.
If you look into the historical context of the time that Jesus was up and kicking, it's anything but; The entire 'turn the other cheek' is just modern interpretation that has nothing to do with the original message.
When Jesus says 'turn the other cheek', he's saying 'Force your enemy to respect you.' When he said 'carry their burdens another mile', he's telling you 'If someone seeks to enslave you, make them break the law'. Fight smartly, pick your battles, but you must fight.
Jesus was anything but passive. Violence is perfectly permissible, even applauded, under the right circumstance.
Modern teachings, however, have stressed the passivity to a near breaking point. There are two reasons for this, one known historically, and the other a personal theory of mine.
For one, women have been seen as the spiritual center of the family for atleast two centuries, if not more. Teaching of scripture is therefor going to focus on a more passive, 'get along' approach, as this is what appeals to women - and the more people in the pews on sunday, the more money the church gets.
My personal theory, though... Thing is, priests aren't stupid. They're college educated, in fact(depending on your denomination. The ones I learned of were.) And I think they very well know that the one most terrifying force in society is young, restless males, seeking to inflict change. So they work to try and remedy that, preaching passive martyrdom at every turn and opportunity.
And that's why you get modern Christanity. And why they've been consistently loosing people over the various decades.
But what the hell do I know. It's friday evening and I'm drunk. Fuck it.
But then they wouldn't be able to scream for attention about how they're a precious special unique character that everyone and their dog should bow down and worship.
Attention whores gonna attention whore.
It makes perfect sense, however.
She's a woman and a democrat. When has anyone ever dared to tell her 'no'?
Several, actually.
Just. Y'know. They keep getting ignored in the media landscape as a whole. (We all know why.)
Yet ask any liberal normie about school shooting and political terrorism or assassination attempts, and you'll get no end of sperging about right wing death squads or some shit.
Or the Arabic slave trade.
Amazing the problems you solve when you geld your slaves before it becomes an issue.
If it's men's responsibility for a woman to cheat, then it should also be their responsibility to punish them for cheating.
But a lot of people don't want to consider that. We've offloaded the authority for punishment onto greater society, and that failed a fuck-off long time ago.
Some people just need a good punch to the face to smack the bitch out of them. Or several. But that's a conversation most people aren't willing to have.
No. I wouldn't.
The 'women are wonderful' is an obscenely powerful force.
farmhand no matter how much they pay
Hard doubt on this. There were a few smattered news articles here and there back in the days of Trump that basically amounted to 'Lack of illegals resulted in wage increase with actual fucking Americans stepping up to the plate to fill the job role'.
They got silenced pretty quickly, though. Can't imagine why. (I can totally imagine why.)
Every time the matter of illegals 'working the jobs americans won't' gets brought up, the masks come off - everything from 'We need our toilets cleaned and we can't do it ourselves' to 'It'll result in the cost of food going up'.
You know what? I've got no problems with that.
By 'bland builds' they meant 'Why do people keep making characters that are white and male?'
And being the bubble-drowning, coom-brained retards that they are, the obvious answer of 'Because people want to play as themselves, you stupid fuck' never occurred to them.
Or that, gee, the majority of their customer base are white men with alot of spare income on hand.
Having said all that, I don't mind character creation, as it atleast gives me the option of roleplay and self-imposed custom game modes.
Airships.
Hell, there was an idea being floated around for a multi-national nuclear-powered airship moving around as a type of floating 'world convention' or some such.
...look, yeah, I know that airships had issues and whatnot, but goddammit, I would have loved to fly on the Graf Zepplin or Hindenburg just once.
like you
Hold the fuck up - yeah, no, you gotta be looking for someone else if you think I'm anti-nuclear.
You're not wrong about the propaganda, though.
The NS Savannah wasn't even a cargo ship, technically - it was classified as a merchant ship, and was basically a cargo/cruise ship combination.
One big propaganda barge, basically.
Still, the engineering they put into the thing was hella cool. But it basically failed commercially - weirdly enough, some nations have issues with nuclear power plants rocking into their port cities. Wonder why...
"We can't expect God to do all the work."
What the fuck.
No. No, no fucking way. Head wounds bleed like a son of a bitch, and blood doesn't fucking splatter like that.
What fucking timeline is this?
What percentage of interracial rapes are white on black?
None whatsoever.
No, seriously. None. The number is so insignificant it doesn't even register when they tally up the statistics.
I still boggle at that, a little.
Fair where fair is due, I'm not seeing alot of that.
What I am seeing is alot of gun-owners basically calling for a repeat with Budweiser and to burn them to the ground.
And alot of so-called 'gun owners' suddenly stumbling out of the wood-work to mumble something about how suddenly 'cancel culture' is bad, or how this was totally a good thing due to the person in question being a Jan 6 protestor, or how getting rid of your safes won't mean a damn thing you guise, srsly.
I might not be looking in the right places, though.
'Modern aberration' in a sense of the past 500 years, perhaps.
There is no more terrifying force than a single male, with young being debatable. Most societies that want to last will find something to do with them, and while the 20th century alone has had some serious population bottlenecks, I'm always just a little skeptical at the idea of 'we've always gotten rid of roughly 50% of men one way or another.'
As far as birth control goes, it's arguably worse - it's been proven that it literally alters what women see as attractive.
Women have a deformed view on what's attractive -> men respond to it -> get married -> get off birth control -> divorce.
I doubt hormonal birth control will ever be seen on the same level as lobotomies as far as medical procedures go, but maybe it should be.