That's the worst part, really. While it's good to see a push for less immigration(and this wouldn't be even close to the first moratorium the US has done), we're used to seeing this type of tactic from the left, not the right.
So the question now becomes, well, who the fuck is pulling the strings?
I dunno. Maybe we're finally reaching the preference cascade and the people working in the background now realize what's honestly popular and not just shilled by the mass media. Here's hoping.
Or worse, they're roleplaying as a centrist.
Until you start scratching away at their overall philosophy, and they're basically a hard-left blue-tribe liberal who just has one or two opinions that got them excommunicated from their cult.
And yet, without fail, they're make constant excuses for leftist violence while crawling over broken glass to harass and shut-down the idea the right should return in-kind.
Either people haven't come to grips that the ground-game has changed drastically for alot of opinions that were once forbidden to speak about, or they've fallen for the propaganda and merely think such things are unpopular and considered with disgust, when the opposite is true.
Or, conversely, they're still stuck on taking the 'moral high road' in their deluded drive to think that'll help them win, somehow.
I've been lurking in some reddit forums, and I'm seeing a similar talking point about 'avoiding another Kent State', and I agree. We should avoid another Kent State. Where a bunch of terrorists threatening to blow up buildings and murder people get to repaint themselves as a bunch of peace-loving oh-so-innocent college kids who were just trying to make love, not war, maaaaaaan.
One can only hope that we've wrestled enough information power away from Academia and Journalists that something like that doesn't happen again.
Then again, people seem to have completely forgotten about the June 7th riots, so maybe I'm just not cynical enough.
There is a vast, monstrous difference between your ancestors coming over after a months-long journey to escape religious persecution or famine or political persecution to wrestle a first-world nation from actively murderous wildlife and natives and third-world browns getting shuttled over by leftie NGOs in air-conditioned planes and buses, and comparing the two shows how disingenuous and hateful these fucks are.
I can't find the damn image(of course), but someone did a one-for-one comparison of recent video game characters and the actors they were based off of.
The men looked exactly the same, but all the women were actively-uglified.
When you see it side-by-side, it becomes so stupidly obvious even normies start asking questions.
Reciprocity and estopple.
It's one of the more annoying traits I see in alot of firearm enthusiasts, even the ones not claiming to be liberals. I struggle to find the proper term for them. 'Cuckservative' doesn't quite work, but...
Anyways, said group has a very, very bad habit of constantly loosing their shit if you volunteer the idea that, hey, trannies and liberals and socialists kitting and arming up isn't exactly a good thing.
But the 2a is for everyone, right? In theory, yes. I'm not exactly going to be celebrating when a bunch of people whom hate me and want me dead start getting the tools necessary to complete the job.
To bad, we don't want him any more. He needs to stay the fuck out and enjoy his progressive 'utopia'.
Seriously, he sounds like a picture-perfect example of why people think 'the experts' are complete retards. He's a gun enthusiast and didn't know Canada's take on firearms? Christ.
People really, really don't want to acknowledge just how much of MLK's activism was pure scripted propaganda, and driven by northern backers.
For instance, he and his coterie traveled through several southern states(even received a police escort through one of them) until a retarded Democrat Governor from Alabama decided to give them exactly what they wanted.
Because it was deliberate and malicious.
NGOs were importing somalians into Minnesota as far back as, what, the 1980s? None of that was natural, none of it was organic. It was pure demographic poison driven by people that were allowed the figleaf of 'muh poor hecking brownerinos' and blank-slate ideology while jerking themselves off at the idea of eradicating Whites as a whole.
Oh, so conservatives are not blind zealots that will mindlessly support someone just because they slap a handy label next to their name, and will actively question and examine the issue on a case-by-case basis, considering the context and circumstance?
I feel like I should be talking dirty when someone's sucking my dick this hard...
It's something I've noticed for years, by this point.
Point out how unsuccessful you are sexually(or even just relationship-wise), and people will stumble over broken glass trying to find some excuse or fault to explain it away.
They never want to point out that getting a relationship is one part luck, another part skill, and that society as a whole has done it's best to take both of those elements out of the equation by destroying everything that could help the median average find a relationship and a good life.
Yeah, no. This is just female narcissism in action. 'Look at how hot I am? See how fucking hot I am!? Don't you want to fuck me? To bad, you can't!'
There's dangers involving AI deepfakes, but this isn't one of them.
Women really shouldn't be involved in politics.
Inb4 White Knights and simps try to explain away that women really don't go after the ten percent, bro, all that data is old and it's not really true anyways.
...yeah, this is something I've been hearing recently in the forums I browse when bored.
Fucking finally.
You have no idea how much I've wanted a program like this. Definitely grabbing it later.
If there's one thing that's pissed me off in recent years, it's how fan translators have made it completely impossible to easily download their stuff for offline consumption and backup.
I prefer Arizona, myself. Wide range of environments, dry heat in the summer, cold in the winter, and it's nearby to a bunch of other nice spots to visit.
Both. Both?
I'm thinking both.
Last I checked, not even modders were trying to save that mess of a game.
When even modders check out, you know you've managed to pull a right clusterfuck.
What is the "'fucking whale in the room?", honest question?
TLDR, Government. Or society, if you prefer. They tend to blend together.
Credit where credit is due, he atleast admits this in his more recent posting. So, progress, I guess?
The problem with hoe_math is that he's great at making observations, but shit at giving advise.
He's begun to devolve into boomer-isms where he insists that getting together with your group of personal friends, forming a militia-like group, and banding together against the world will solve all your ills and get you the girl.
Which, uh, sounds great, except he keeps ignoring the fucking whale in the room and seems blind to anyone pointing out the downsides of this plan.
How does the phrase go? For women, Titanic is a love story. For men, Titanic is a horror story.
There was one in Colorado, I think, that was an attempt that got quietly and quickly shoved under the rug.
There's a long rant I've got saved up for one day about the feminization of Christianity and how, historically over the past 2 centuries, if not more, the woman was seen as the 'spiritual' center of the household but ANYWAYS-
Yes, if you take the New Testament in the historical context, Jesus and his scriptures are very much guerilla warfare on a small scale against your aggressors. Jesus teaches that you should force your enemies to respect you, if someone seeks to enslave you, you force them to break the law, people whom harm children should be rule 2'd, and violence is very much a feasible option to solve a problem.
Buuuuuuut, Priests are very much focused on getting money(hence speaking toward the women among their flock) and also focused on not rocking the boat(hence the emphasis on pacifism).
In that theme, if you ever see anyone with a 'Only God Can Judge Me' tattoo, I advise you get the fuck away from that person as soon as feasible.
Or do something that would violate rule 2. As they're likely the worst kind of person using it as an excuse to do the worst kind of things.
I'm sure women will come out of the woodwork any time now to blubber on about how it's men that normally leave women in these types of situation.
This is a lie, btw. Most couples don't break up - the one study that was done that found this turned out to have completely fucked the math and had to do a serious retraction.
Libertarians have an extremely retarded take on immigration, and equally retarded takes on how to 'fix the issue'.
I've seen them argue along the lines of 'Well, let them come in, but they have no access to any government-funded resource', and I can only stare agog, because they're either really fucking stupid in thinking that would ever work and people would allow it, or they're actively hostile and think this would actually convince others.
Then you have Bryan Caplan, who actively admits he's lying to get more people in, is actively hostile toward his opponents, and lives in an extremely wealthy gated community. My opinion on him would likely violate several rules on this forum.