I'm in Canada. Literally every party I've been at has cocaine and it's more prolific the richer and more affluent the group of people. I'm also in finance and worked in O&G, both are which are notorious for cocaine. I suspect like 20% of people in high finance are doing cocaine. Probably higher for O&G.
Once you learn to spot it and the people likely into it, it's hard to miss. I can go to the "classiest" fanciest cocktail place and find groups of hot girls and guys doing cocaine on a random Tuesday.
That seems kind of broad. Cocaine is great because it generally makes women hornier and more willing to do crazy shit (have sex with men) whereas, while alcohol can sometimes accomplish this, women can't really handle their alcohol. Combining alcohol with cocaine also lets you keep going much longer. When normally you'd be blackout and ready to pass out, a little cocaine keeps you going. It's a terrible drug for men to do though because it's exceptionally hard to get hard and cum while fucking a chick. It can be done but not easy. A lot of guys I know keep the cocaine around for the chicks and literally do none themselves or very very little. More like a quick little booster near the end of the night. If you're really drunk and want to fuck a chick but you're just too drunk, a little cocaine and then wait a bit for it to wear off can lead to a way better sexual experience you'll actually remember. That's another thing, when you do cocaine you'll remember more whereas if you were drunk you'd probably forget everything which is another advantage.
Overall, it is a good party drug. It's actually one of the best next to alcohol for partying, espeidally if you can control how much you're doing which is much easier than people think. I can do one little line and never touch it for the rest of the night. I have a harder time stopping alcohol than cocaine. The hang overs from cocaine are way worse than alcohol so maybe that's why. I also find cocaine with alcohol will mellow any alcohol hangover the next day.
I've never been to a party passed high school/university where there wasn't cocaine at the party and neither have most people. Oh maybe you didn't know there was someone with cocaine on them but it was there. Also, the more attractive the people at the party the higher probability there's cocaine.
The public is just fooling itself if they think their elected leaders, business leaders and role models aren't all doing cocaine or have at least dabbled in it here or there. When you've seen the eyes light up on nerdy, innocent, career oriented chicks you'd never expect to like cocaine a few times as soon as they hear there's cocaine, you kind of realize how prevelant it is and how much people love the stuff.
Oh, I see why they chose black women to play female dwarves. I can't tell the difference between black men or women either.
Government hangs protestors. I'm shocked. It's not like governments don't freeze people's bank accounts and throw them in prison for protesting here as well or something.
I once dated a journalist who worked for CNN. I thought she was going to be the most leftist idiot around but she actually wasn't at all. She told me a couple interesting things. It didn't matter how accurate she reported on a subject because before it got published it would get edited and it would be changed to suit what the organization wanted. She said it was frustrating and upsetting because oftentimes whatever ended up published wasn't anywhere close to what she originally wrote and the message was entirely skewed. Lastly, she told me you're better off watching YouTube videos made by independent journalists than CNN if you want accurate reporting. I thought it was interesting to hear a journalist who worked at CNN say that.
I think the masses have always been easy to control with misinformation. Whether that's through newspapers, religious clergy, television, social media, whatever. Most people buy into it. Yet you also always had skeptics. I think the internet has just given more documented voice to skeptics whereas if you're searching for evidence of skeptics existing in history, you simply won't find documented evidence of them because the institutions that do the documenting of things were always controlled by the party that creates the false narrative to sell to the masses.
Hi, my name is ForeignInvader. I am a survivor of bad things, please hear me roar.
You guys threw bottles on stage and almost hit me. That's the most racist thing I've ever experienced in my life. Damn, the oppression is high with this one.
3.2 gorillion
This is the correct take. It's not women plotting, it's Jews plotting; however, one of the subversive elements the Jews plot is to empower women and oppress men. This is by design but it's not because a cabal of women are plotting this, it has always been a Jewish plot. Check into feminism and you'll see that Jewish leaders were behind a lot of the feminist movements. Almost all modern liberalism or communism or Bolshevism (however you want to call it) is tied to Jews. White women actually were majority against feminism until they started being indoctrinated by the academic system which again is controlled by Jews. I wonder if people realize Ghislaine Maxwell (Epstein's accomplice)'s father was a MOSSAD agent who literally owned an academic textbook company that merged with McGraw-Hill. Your textbooks are literally written by MOSSAD. That's the cabal, it's not "women".
Imp is either a Jewish subverter or he's just that much of a misogynist he refuses to accept the truth.
If you really dabble into the Jewish hole, what you'll find is Jews themselves have a gynocentric nature. I mean, their lineage is determined by the mother not father, unlike white societies, which should tip you off. Here's an interesting book, written by a Jew, that ties everything together on this subject.
https://booklaunch.io/simplycharly/hitlersfavoritejew
Otto Weininger was an Austrian philosopher whose provocative book Sex and Character suggested that all humans had both male and female characteristics, while also equating femininity with “Jewishness”
It's in Jews nature. Their biological programming. To seek out gynocentrism. When Jews rule your societies they become gynocentric because that is what Jews prefer. Jews are the ultimate simps.
I usually will get banned on this message board for going this deep. Oh well, I'll just make a 40th new account. Cya.
100% agreed. These women see other (foreign) women as a threat and are trying to corrupt these women in order to ensure these women aren't threats anymore. She's also doing this to be vindictive toward any of her potential simps that might go for foreign women instead of simping for her.
As far as women are concerned, men that don't simp for them deserve death so women go out of their way to make the lives of men that don't simp for them miserable.
Some of the most attractive and successful men I know go overseas for women simply because the quality they can get overseas is 1000x better than they can here yet they can have 10 dates a week here if they wanted and often still do.
I myself have joined this club as well after years of resisting because I happen to find white women more physically attractive. Now that I'm in my 30s, the white women have lost most of their beauty and asians actually are better looking in their 30s than white women. When you've got a 9/10 Thai girl sucking your dick and telling you how amazing you are and all you had to do was go up to her and say hi at the club, vs. women in Canada (where I live) where they are 6/10 and act like you owe them just to be lucky enough to be graced with their presence, why would you ever want a North American woman? The juice just isn't worth the squeeze. I feel sorry for men that don't realize how much better the foreign women are and believe feminists propaganda that you're somehow a lesser man or suffer some sort of deficiency because you go for foreign women. Foreign women are superior to Western Women in every way imaginable. They treat men well, they are skinny, they like to have sex without using it as a leverage tool as much as western women and they act feminine even if it's just an act, they'll put it on for you. Sure, at the end of the day they might be seeking a green card or whatever, at least I can still benefit from this in the meantime. Whatever western women want is just so much that they aren't even worth dealing with.
The reason men go for foreign girls isn't a deficiency in the men, it's because the supply of quality western women is incredibly low. It's actually the women in western countries that are lacking not the men. And yes, this woman in the OP is 100% right, all the qualities she describes of independent strong western women are qualities men do not find attractive at all. This idea that men are deficient because they don't find women like this attractive has to be one of the most offensive things around. Denying a man what he finds attractive simply because women don't want to be whatever men want them to be is deplorable. Let men want what they want and if foreign women are able to provide it, great. Don't be mad at men for not finding you attractive. Women do not deserve to have men love them for who they are. Most western women are entirely unlovable because their personalities are absolute garbage. That's not men's fault. That's 100% the fault of women. It is women who need to change if women don't want men to go for foreign women. Men aren't the ones who need to change.
You actually think the reason men can't get a woman in western society is due to the man's low social intelligence? Really? That's quite pathetic on your end for thinking that. That couldn't be further from the truth.
Sounds like she's bitter that she can't find a man and blames men instead of her low social intelligence. This is just her being vindictive. Perhaps a man left her for a woman from one of these countries so this is her way of getting back at men like that one ex that made it personal for her.
In reality, she's not wrong but she's naïve to think the women from these countries need help. That's typical white women everyone needs help syndrome she's displaying there. The women in these countries have entire cultures around exploiting white men and they know the routine better than her. They even know which countries benefit them most (Canada) and look specifically for guys in these countries.
She's just purposely making this on twitter to create outrage in hopes of pissing off men. No one should be upset by this because it is in fact the truth. This is exactly how foreign women see things too. A woman's nature doesn't change whether she is American or Thai. Their nature is 100% the same, even if there are some racial differences. This idea of finding some hot skinny trad foreign girl to be your submissive obedient wife for life is entirely fantasy. Foreign women are gold-diggers that see men as nothing more than providers. They will exploit and use men all the same as western women.
Never ever ever bring a foreign woman back to a western country, ever, and expect good results.
You can still benefit from foreign women though. Go to Thailand and fuck $80 hookers or even just go to the clubs. You'll find hot women wiling to fuck you way easier than in western countries.
That's a pretty niche topic that's going to get old pretty fast though. At first it's about proving it's happening but then it becomes too hard to deny, then it becomes about figuring out why. Once you have that down, it becomes what can you do about it. Then you've tackled everything and there's not much more to discuss.
I don't disagree that one user can kill a community, because it's definitely possible. I just think you discount a lot of the other factors. Communities often build on shared experiences. Whether that's going to school, learning, playing video games, politics, etc... Yet over time, people grow and change themselves which impacts any community.
I've been a part of a lot of niche communities on the internet and all of them change. I could look back and try to pin the blame on one user if I wanted but that would be disingenuous. Sure, the one mod started over moderating, the one user started spamming whatever he cared about, what used to be civil discourse changed to memes, whatever. There's always disruption and sometimes communities just die out on their own because what used to unify people no longer mattered.
I mean, take this community for example. I wasn't here from the beginning but if I understand it, it's about video games that then became political after gamergate. That right off the bat lets me know a few things. The original demographics are going to be teenagers, likely single, in school. The demographics then shift to young adult, serious relationships, marriage, career. The demographics right now lead to an enviable collapse of the community because most quality people are going to dip out of discussing video games and gender wars before they hit 30yo to focus on more important things. If they come on from time-to-time they aren't going to want to see whining and complaining and blackpills since their life is going good, they'll want to see more positivity. Over time the community will simply emcumbus mostly those who are bitter and upset about their current situation in life and even then posting becomes a bore. You can only discuss the same things over and over again before you've discussed them to death. I mean take gaming on its own, skip the politics. The whole gambling style of gaming has mostly killed gaming. Big name gaming companies are making mobile games to sell skins for $20 to some rich Asians. Gameplay is something that hasn't been innovated since the 2000s. What's there left to discuss except how shit most games are these days.
Anyway, I'm rambling. The point I'm trying to make is all good things come to an end, including internet communities. It's not usually 1 guy that killed it. He may have been the catalyst but it was already dying by then, otherwise it would have likely been robust enough to survive one subverter. You can draw the same parralel to western society if you'd like as well.
I'm now imagining him with like 8 screens up doing it to 8 different girls at once with hidden cams of them crying afterward while also listening to classical music.
Damn, it has a 7.5/10 on IMDB... that's better than most movies. Must have a great cult following or something. I need to watch this lol.
Exactly and most men will make that argument. But when your wife is bagging groceries at the grocery store, coming home, saying she works harder than you and you should do all the work, that's probably going to be a problem yet if she didn't work and did all the housework, you'd prefer that over her bagging groceries. I get that it's more complicated. I'm just saying the easiest way to solve any complications is to get her to not work and do precisely what you said you'd find value in.
When a woman work full time, you're going to run into huge problems with what is fair and equal work in a relationship.
Which is why it's always preferably to have a wife who doesn't work, so she can contribute in other ways and not think you need to work harder to be equitable.
Let's frame it another way. If you earn $200k/yr working part-time and she earns $50k/yr working full-time; who should be doing the cooking and cleaning? She'll say you because she works harder but in reality it should be her because you're contributing 4x as much to the relationship. Equitable means she needs to pull up her contribution level in such a scenario. That's the point I'm getting at.
Do you think a doctor should be paid the same as a garbage man? Why not? What is it about a doctor's work that makes it more valuable? Supply/demand, right? I'm saying the work I do is more valuable than the work she does overall, just because she might struggle more doesn't mean my work is any lesser than hers or hers is somehow "more work".
Here's how you actually combat the "men should take on an equitable share of household labour"...
All men would agree with this in concept. Men are very much about equity. The problem though when you get into equity issues with women is that women are unable to grasp quality/effort of work and are only really good at grasping time of work and only time of work they can observe. To give you a really basic example: A man might decide to rewire something. If the man has no experience wiring things, this can be fairly dangerous. He's going to need to read up on it for a few hours at least and watch some youtube videos. He has to research. The wiring itself might take him 30 minutes to do but it required a couple days of research and a lot of brainpower on his part, not to mention risk involved in doing something entirely new. It wasn't easy or comfortable at all and was outside his comfort zone. A woman sees the man spend 30 minutes rewiring something and to her, her 30 minutes of doing the dishes is on par with that labour. This is incredibly inequitable in the way she's treating his work but that is how much women will treat it.
Now back to how you handle this... Women shouldn't be working a full-time 40 hour a week job. Women should instead be at home, home-schooling and looking after the household. Thus your 40 hours of work to earn an income should be equivalent to her cooking, cleaning and looking after the kids. In this way you never have an argument on equity because you have completely different roles.
When both people work, it causes massive problems with regard to equity. For example, I spent 8 years in education with a masters in statistics and my work is something most women, or people even, aren't smart enough to do. Do I work hard? Absolutely not. I have an extremely well-paid easy job but I earned this through 8 years of schooling and my superior intelligence. A woman might realize I don't work that hard because I come home from work early and I'm not stressed out. Meanwhile, she might be a nurse who is stressed out of her mind. She now thinks I should contribute more to the household work because I have an easier job despite the fact I earn twice as much as she does. Just because I'm smarter and worked hard to get to where I am doesn't mean I should have to do more work at home simply because of her lack of competence. But women will see it this way.
Trust me, I've been in long-term serious relationships... The only real way to make a relationship work when it comes to equitable work is to not have the woman work and to have completely distinct roles rather than having the same role and splitting things 50/50. Each person should have a completely different responsibility. No shared responsibilities. Otherwise, there's going to be issues. Most modern relationships that work-well tend to be ones where the men do most of the work yet the irony of these relationships is the women often try to proclaim that they are contributing 50/50. Men get 0 appreciation for their contribution.
Correct. As soon as we let negros vote, white women were like wtf? If negros can vote, so should they and the rest is history.
I just disagree with this because some of the nicest people I know have done cocaine and some of the biggest assholes I know would never touch the stuff because of their superiority complex. I would also agree that a lot of narcissists and sociopaths use cocaine but those groups also drink water. Doesn't mean everyone who does has those qualities.
How people cope with clown world depends on the individual. Some guys post on MGTOW forums. Others go out binge drink and snort cocaine. Mental health issues? Man, if you aren't having coping problems in this modern society such that you might turn to drugs to take the edge off then I'd say you're the one with the mental health disorder.