Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

65
UK to criminalize “staring” at women. (only applies if you are poor or ugly?) (archive.vn)
posted 3 years ago by NotAGlowy 3 years ago by NotAGlowy +65 / -0
44 comments share
44 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (44)
sorted by:
▲ 56 ▼
– TentElephant 56 points 3 years ago +56 / -0

Women's rights and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– JuliasEbola00 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0

The equality of men was just as dangerous, as weak men having a say in society is what brought us female liberation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– ForeignInvader 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Correct. As soon as we let negros vote, white women were like wtf? If negros can vote, so should they and the rest is history.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– JuanTitor 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I truly believe original voting rules in the US where only landowners could vote is better than anything existing anywhere in the world today.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I'm sure Bill Gates is ok with that approach today. Bet he'd weigh it based on how much land one owns.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Ahaus667 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

Rights don’t exist without responsibilities to maintain them. The second we gave a free bill of rights with no repercussions we doomed our society.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 38 ▼
– deleted 38 points 3 years ago +38 / -0
▲ 37 ▼
– MLGS 37 points 3 years ago +37 / -0

Women over 35 doing the reporting on their behalf.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– GloboHomoErectus 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

By mumbo jumbo inference statistics.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– SturmMilfEnthusiast 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

By asking her and hoping she hasn't recently binged 16 hours of true crime TV, I'm guessing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– Decrixxx 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

"I made it up"

oh wait these people want to pass themselves as better than they are, then it written: "you take a poll and take all the replies for granted", keep making le polls until you get the required result for the articles

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– realerfunction 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

"my source is that i made it the fuck up!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– acp_k2win 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0

like every other law it has the hidden caveat

*only applies to white men

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– JuanTitor 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Islamic rape is the glory of places like Sweden and the UK.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– Smith1980 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

How would that even hold up in court? What if a woman stares at an attractive guy like a piece of meat?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– RandomFurryDude 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

What if a woman stares at an attractive guy like a piece of meat?

Nothing happens. Only women can be offended or sexually harassed. They've made that quite clear for over 10 years now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Smith1980 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

That’s true. I guess that is in the same line of double standards as it being ok for a muscle bound man to be on a romance novel but if a woman is in a bikini it’s sexualization.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– RandomFurryDude 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Bingo.

It's why modern movies still feature muscle-hunk actors to attract the ladies, but the female characters get uglier by the year, and cover up more of their bodies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– troon_menace 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Simply identify as a woman for that period of time required to bring charges

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– JuanTitor 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

The biggest difference is even if illegal, no guy would care enough to report it unless it was some daily harassment from the same person.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– deleted 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– -Fender- 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Really going out of their way to make sure men want nothing to do with women and avoid then like the plague.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

That isn't allowed either.

If you don't simp enough, then you get declared an incel and an enemy of the state.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– TeeBP 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

They'll only enforce this against straight white men, every other race will get a free pass and the police will defend them when they gangrape the girls.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– sasanian 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Yep, even though nonwhite men are the ones that are actually making it unsafe for women to walk at night. But they can't say that, so it just has to be "men".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– coke501 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Nah, it will also be applied if you are rich and hot but turn her down. Especially then.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– OldBullLee 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Why has England gone collectively insane? Is there no resistance to any of this shit? I don't even hear of any dissent from anyone but the usual suspects like Murray or Benjamin, and they usually concern themselves with larger cultural or philosophical issues, not the police state that England has become, incrementally, the death by a thousand cuts, like this one.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Hellsbells00 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Generational draining of the gene pool. Between the wars and the colonies, nearly every male line that has a functional level of testosterone has left the british. Now all that are left are half men and soy cuck goblinoids.

The english as a people are DEAD. Their nation is LOST and is the first conquered colony of the European caliphate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– FrozeInFear 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

The article was updated. Staring is not part of the proposed law.

The backbencher's bill aims to criminalise:
Deliberately walking closely behind someone as they walk home at night
Making obscene or aggressive comments towards a person
Making obscene or offensive gestures towards a person
Obstructing a person's path
Driving or riding a vehicle slowly near to a person making a journey
As it stands, the bill will also introduce harsher sentences - increasing the maximum sentences from six months to two years.
Campaigners have also called for wolf-whistling and staring intently to be criminalised.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Deliberately walking closely behind someone as they walk home at night

They are going to have to define some of this shit.

What's too close? How long is too long?

So now you can't walk in the same direction as a lone woman at night even if that's your direction of travel?

What about women that are slow walkers? Now you have to keep their pace?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– NotAGlowy [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

What if the man is old and tired from his physical job. Does he still have to cross the road or walk around in circles until she leaves?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– NotAGlowy [S] 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Yeah - it appears to have changed. Lucky I archived it.

The feminists that run the BBC probably put “new staring law” out there as a trial balloon

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– GiveThemNothing 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Lower your eyes, peasants, lest your masters be offended by your mere existence.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– bloodguard 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Probably won't apply to non-anglo either. So poor, ugly white dudes will be required to keep their eyes down at all times.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MLGS 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

You can totally ruin a woman's entire week by staring at her so it makes sense they'd make it illegal now that things are arranged around their delicate sensibilities.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– JohnTorrington 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

That nation deserves everything. Should burn for causing the World Wars.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FatalConceit 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

what if you're blind and on a train and don't even know you're doing it?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I don't stare at women, I stare through them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy