[REDACTED}
If you want to know why you are dangerously wrong, I'd be happy to tell you. Or you could just take my word that this is a fucking stupid idea.
It has been shown time and time again that it is much easier to kill a man than to change their mind.
After you make enough examples, fear takes over and they change their own mind. A generation later you have socialist China.
That sounds exactly like something a massive faggot would say.
The ride never ends.
Guy, are reading what I wrote? Here, I'll write it again. Tell me if you need help with any of the big words.
If you punish cops for performing their duty to the community, cops won't perform their duty.
If you reward (or fail to punish) cops for doing nothing, cops will do nothing.
The cops that have community service as a major motivation will leave the force.
If you think that Derek Chauvin is the the only time that this has happened, then you are not paying attention. There has been wide-spread anti cop sentiment for years. Some places more than others.
If you want a police force that isn't worthless then you must incentivize the behaviors you want. Want heroics? Reward heroics. That starts at the top.
Both are true. Japan was (generally) poor as shit, with almost the entire population (by percentage) caught in a cycle of iron age subsistence farming.
Stagnation had occurred long ago, and things had been held stable (and shit) for more than a hundred years due to the (very effective) system of the shogun taking hostages of noble families.
Trade was a way for people to make money and have a better life. The people who were secretly involved in trading with westerners made so much money that it destabilized the entire Japanese economy.
The Japanese are usually obstinate bastards and isolationists to boot. Gunboat diplomacy worked so well because the Japanese people already knew that there was a way out of desperate, subsistence farming for almost everyone if Japan was opened up in trade.
The Shogunate could no longer suppress the people by keeping noble hostages. because the subjects didn't care. A chain of events was set in motion that lead to a popular uprising, the overthrow of feudalism, and the end of the samurai caste.
A woman who become a 403 (at the slut-mill that universities have become) is cashing out early.
A 403 is realizing her high social value and high marriage value by attending parties (where she gets free booze and drugs) and riding the cock carrousel.
This results in her long term prospects being much more shit than they otherwise would have been.
One of the most important decisions a person can make in their life is who they will marry. A woman picks the best choice possible of the suitors available.
The best time for her to do this is in her early 20s. Since people in their early 20s tend to make stupid decisions, a young lady should rely on the advice and guidance of her family.
Modern 'liberated' women don't do this. They trade long term happiness and security for short term hedonisms. They all take turns in letting Chad or Tyrone ride them like a skateboard. When they graduate at 24 and work for a few years, they suddenly find that the selection of marriage candidates at 29 or 32 is a tiny fraction of what it was when they were 19 and had a low body count. Furthermore she is probably so damaged by riding the cock carrousel that she may well be incapable of forming a stable relationship as a wife.
This is one of the primary contributors to the low state of the happiness of women. In general women are less happy than they have been in decades.
What dissonance? Here, I will use smaller words for you.
If you punish cops for performing their duty to the community, cops won't perform their duty.
If you reward (or fail to punish) cops for doing nothing, cops will do nothing.
The cops that have community service as a major motivation will leave the force.
Please point out where I'm wrong. I'd love to correct my world-view.
Women instinctively realize that beautiful women have a higher social status.
For women, their maximum social status is at about 19 years of age. Their maximum marriage value is at about age 22. From there it is a slow decline until the wall at 32 or so, and then a sharp drop.
Older women can gain social value from their family and their accomplishments. The most prominent being that she has beautiful daughters and successful sons. If a woman begins having children at 20 she can be a strong and respected matriarch of a family by 45. This is an anathema to feminists who despise their biological role as mothers.
The social status a woman starts with (at 19) is dramatically higher if she is beautiful. Pretty women get access to more opportunity to get good husbands and have a successful family. Since feminists tell each other that families are oppression they hate that pretty women have an incentive (long term) to participate in families and motherhood for (long term) social status and material wealth.
Pain and older women bitterly resent that they don't have the same social value as beautiful women. Older women are incensed by loss of their value.
Attacking femininity, beauty and feminine traits takes power and opportunity from these young, beautiful women. The feminists then seek to apply that to all women, thus improving their social status as a class.
That is why they say things like: "All women are beautiful"; while at the same time attempting to shame women who appear in sports illustrated as "pandering to the male gaze"
That doesn't invalidate my post. If all the cops on the force are selfish and take bribes, then it was an equally cynical calculation that caused them to stand by while the shooter murdered the teaching staff.
To storm the building gained them nothing. To stand by and wait was safe.
The only difference is that all the good cops (if there ever were any) left long before Saint George met his end.
While I don't disagree, you have to put it in context. I'm not trying to excuse the behavior of the cops, that said:
Following the Saint George of Fentanyl incident, it was made crystal clear to cops everywhere that following training and doing the right thing was no protection from life in prison. Derek Chauvin arrived on the scene to assist two rookie cops who were too afraid to take action. Officer Chauvin then took action as per his training. He was scrupulous about following procedure exactly, because he was well aware of the cameras in his face and the hostile crowd.
There was a SNAFU, the ambulance stopped a short distance away, unwilling to respond to an incident in a hostile crowd. After the rookies understood and cleared the crowd enough, Saint George was given medical attention. He died on route to the hospital.
Officer Chauvin was charged with the pre meditated murder of Saint George and will serve decades in prison.
At that point every single cop in the USA took notice and many of the best either quit or made plans to quit.
Given that the standards of firearms training is not very high for most cops, the officers on the scene were almost certainly terrified of taking action in front of cameras and under trained to effectively clear the school room by room and execute the gunman.
Don't get me wrong. I would have done it. I am not a cop and I don't have any skill with a firearm. I am certainly not an operator, but I would have known what should have been done. I would have done it or died trying. BUT every cop who had that attituded had been either chased out of the force or had the fear of god put into them by the utterly hostile system, which includes the DA and the senior management of the police force. The spineless dregs that were left made a call. It was safer to do nothing and suffer less consequences than to take action and to probably spend life in prison. In a meaningful way, they were right.
1st Ferengi Rule of Acquisition: "Once you have their money, you never give it back"
The reality is that faggots are obsessed with youth. Look at the huge demand for "twinks" in the gay scene.
Gay men are much more likely to be a sex offender.
That tendency isn't spread evenly over the whole population of gay men. It winds up concentrated in a small minority.
This leads to the situation we have. The gay community and their libertine lifestyle is running cover for calculating groomers and fiddlers.
How many people knew that the famous Harvey Milk liked little boys? It wasn't a hinderence to his political career. Now he even has a US Navy ship named after him and a big budget biopic.
More evidence that boys are disposable.
In many jurisdictions possession of Cheese Pizza is a strict liability offence.
So it doesn't matter how you got it, it doesn't matter what your intention was. Do you have Cheese Pizza? Yes? You are guilty.
Depending on the jurisdiction, even having Cheese Pizza in the inbox of your webmail may be included. Think that through.
In some jurisdictions, even having art of Cheese Pizza is enough. You can sit down with a pencil and draw something that will get you thrown in prison.
The only way any of these laws actually work in the real world is through selective enforcement.
Carpool. Take a friend to shop for back issues. Split the gas and buy twice as many books together.
In the highlands meat is pretty hard to get. The locals mostly eat taro and sweet potato, both of which are starchy root vegetables.
There is local meat in the jungle but it is mostly birds which are small and annoying to hunt.
The locals all raise pigs, which are expensive. Every family has a couple pigs, and they teach them to come when called for feeding.
Once or twice a year each family will kill their pig and have a party. Without refrigeration the pig must be eaten right away. Weddings are super expensive and involve a lot of pork.
As a result the locals are fairly protein starved. In the highlands they have been this way for evolutionary periods. It is to the point that they get sick if they eat too much meat.
When a stranger wanders in to a foreign territory, one of the first thigs that the locals think is: "Free protein!"
This has been slowly changing through access to canned meats (Spam, etc) and missionaries teaching such foreign concepts such as empathy and restraint.
Yes. It does taste good. Yes, it does taste like pork, which is their favorite food.
It is true. People who wear gaming shirts are all psychopaths who might explode into misogyny at any moment.
She was right to literally flee from them and then write a blog post about it.
/s
GW2 killed off her character so as to end the relationship with her.
There were not any lockdowns in the Northern Territory, mate.
The NT prison population is better than 95% aboriginals. They were all caught and convicted in a court of law. There have been several judicial reviews and the consensus is that NT judges are fair or even lenient towards aboriginal Australians.
There are massive, endemic problems in aboriginal communities with child rape, domestic violence, alcoholism and gambling addiction. There are massive problems with child neglect.
Right now there are huge problems with crime in the Northern Territory. Riots, break-ins, car theft, senseless vandalism, the list goes on. Want to know which demographic is overwhelmingly responsible for it?
Guess. Go on! Guess.
...
You racist motherfucker! How dare you!
They learned the lesson of Multiplayer in the original Deus Ex. Multiplayer was a metric fuckton of work. No one wanted it.
And here we are again. Remember that the original Ion Storm went bust due to project bloat.
It won't work. The Women are Wonderful effect (ingroup bias) for women is stronger than any dose of reality.
Most women would literally rather die than be a 'gender traitor'.
I kind of admit, watching Console 'Tards claw their way towards self-awareness is slightly amusing.
This post is just gold. It amounts to: "Wait, it turns out a mechanic for console games that is aimed at dumbing down gameplay kind of sucks! Why would retards want this?"
All while failing to see that they are the problem. Dumbing down games to market them to 'Tards has been overwhelmingly successful. They are so close!
Heh. Whining like a peasant. That is amusing!
But you hate yourself more. Your hobbies include CBT and and typing professional documents in VIM while crying.
Since you are interested.
Firstly a mental health emergency is exactly that. It is an emergency where someone is at risk of harming themselves or others. If there is no risk of harm to people, by definition it isn't an emergency.
Secondly, there is a massive overlap between mental health emergencies and drug use. More than half the mental health emergencies we got at the hospital I worked at were people who had taken so many drugs that they were now insane. It was usually meth, but sometimes it was other things too, or a combination of drugs.
If you go on a four day meth bender you don't sleep. After (about) day two without sleep you start to dream while you are awake. By day four you are literally having a schizoid episode with both the high doses of meth and the brutal lack of sleep.
Worst of all are people with diagnosed mental health disorders, like schizophrenia or bi-polar disorder, who have decided that they hate the meds and are going to take illegal drugs instead to make themselves feel good.
Someone with rapid cycling bi-polar disorder (which can included voices in the head) who is on a meth bender and is convinced that they are literally Christ Returned is going to be very unpredictable and has a strong chance of being violent.
The treatment of mental health patients falls (roughly) into two groups. There are newbies and frequent fliers.
Frequent fliers have been in the system long enough that they have an extensive file. The people in the hospital / mental health unit probably know them by name. They may have a case worker. If they do have a case worker, then by all means call them and ask them to give direction. Hopefully they will have noticed the general trend in behavior before it is an emergency.
That said, for every mental health patient who is having a mental health emergency the team attending must have an ability to escalate along the continuum of force should it be required.
If a pair of social workers turn up to an actual genuine emergency and meet a 22 year old athlete who is being chased by literal demons and decides to stab them, they are going to die.
For example I dealt with a really big lad in his twenties who honestly, truly believed that his family was being killed and replaced by robots who were wearing their skins as a skinsuit. When he went off his meds he truly believed that evil shit out of Terminator was there to drag him off to the murder factories, and he acted accordingly. He was a really sweet guy, but he was absolutely terrified.
I dealt with another lad who was all of 19, who was literally a 6'8" pacific islander and a third bigger than I am. He had just become schizophrenic and had the voices of his ancestors in his head telling him that he was a God of Death; it was his job to decide who lived and who died and he should act on that judgment by killing people. He was not happy with those voices and argued with them. He was always telling them to fuck off and that he would not kill anyone. Cops and everyone else was utterly terrified that he was going to throw down, because it would have taken a small army to take him down without hurting him. It turns out he was a really sweet guy too, but we were very, very nervous.
These guys were mad (insane) rather than bad. Bad people who take shitloads of drugs are much worse and much more dangerous.
I don't have a lot of time for social workers in general, but the idea that cops are mean and evil and that mental health emergencies can be solved with hugs... well it is just bonkers. Someone will literally get killed as soon as they roll out this demented policy.