No response, huh. I came across this just now on KiA - https://archive.fo/d8RC2

Internal documents, leaked to BBC News, reveal that OnlyFans allows moderators to give multiple warnings to accounts that post illegal content on its online platform before deciding to close them.

In May, BBC News revealed the site was failing to prevent under-18s from selling and appearing in explicit videos, despite it being illegal for children to do so. At the time, OnlyFans said attempts to use the site fraudulently were "rare".

There's more listed than just minors, but it's a clear issue with the moderation system:

We obtained several differently-dated versions of the same 2021 document. All, except the oldest, state there should be at least five examples of "illegal" content on an account for it to be "escalated" immediately to management. Later versions from this summer include an apparently contradictory statement requiring immediate management referral for some examples of illegal content.

The document also gives moderators specific instructions for dealing with accounts - depending on how popular each one is. It says accounts with higher numbers of subscribers can be given additional warnings when rules are broken.

However, staff are told to moderate accounts with low user numbers "as we would and [restrict] when necessary". With middle range accounts, they are told to warn, "but only restrict after the 3rd warning". If one of the site's most successful - and lucrative - creators breaks the rules, the account is dealt with by a different team.

OnlyFans was refusing to comply with basic rules around CP

Sources? This is the type of justification often used by authoritarians because, obviously, almost nobody would support that content in the 1st place given how abhorrent it is, in addition to its illegality. However, they willfully make such claims knowing that they are complete fabrications.

I can envision there being CP on the platform at times given how it requires reporting and moderation; any such medium (file/image/video hosts, etc.) is subject to this type of attack vector. But I didn't find anything supporting your assertion of them refusing their moderation responsibilities at a cursory search.

Neither, they banned public sex and the like earlier in the year - https://archive.vn/Tn1nj

Now they're getting rid of all sexually explicit content whilst still allowing softcore nudity.

There are some other sites as well that have been tracking it. Example - https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/epidemiologic-analyses-on-covid19-and-ivermectin/

People have bought the horse paste (it's cheaper than the water soluble) for < $10 since we're all animals and used them either on a weekly or monthly basis.

Durvet apple flavor is the most popular one, but it's been out of supplies in many places. You can still pick it up at Tractor Supply in person and some other retailers though.

Main thing is that if you don't get the Rx for human pills, which are probably more pure, make sure you get the dosage right. There are some charts out there with calculations but you can also do the math.

I've been thinking about buying it for a long time now but haven't gotten around to it. I plan to pick up the paste for emergency use eventually.

begin talking about Ivermectin

Never happening.

That is pretty surprising - https://archive.vn/mW2Qc

The company will prohibit users from posting any sexually explicit conduct, starting in October. Creators will still be allowed to post nude photos and videos, provided they’re consistent with OnlyFans’ policy, the company said Thursday.

Researching this, apparently they banned outdoors activities earlier in the year. Now it looks like they're going softcore.

Apple says the collision is "not a concern". By which I assume they mean "we don't care."

They probably don't. To be fair, none of the links explicitly say the probabilities of collisions other than "perceptual hashes" are more prone.

Is it statistically significant? Don't know.

Would Apple have reason to give a damn, other than reducing false positives (i.e. money spent employing dirty humans for final manual verification as per their PR)? Probably not.

Is Apple and the government going to abuse this? Track record speaks for itself. We don't need proof of concepts to confirm the furthering of privacy degradation.

Edit: This is obviously a great thread and finding btw. I forgot to note that but it's especially important given recent crap littering the forum.

Twitter post screenshot

The vaccines aren't free. They are subsidized by the hyper inflation print machine.

My boss was going to do this and I planned on reporting him, but it looks like Covid got to him first as of two days ago. He’s already in the hospital.

Decent chance of didn't happen for this user, but on the overall topic I came across this article - https://welovetrump.com/2021/08/07/reports-from-israel-australia-claim-95-99-of-hospitalized-covid-19-cases-are-fully-vaccinated/

However, I don't know whether it's accurate.

It's time for insurance companies to lay down the law. Either be vaccinated by Dec 1st or see premium rise in the new year. And you pay 100% of your medical bills.

If it was 100% of medical bills, people wouldn't get insurance. If it was 100% of WuFlu costs, there would be no point to a premium in the first place.

That entire Reddit thread is about as bad as this thread's title. Nothing new or interesting there. Blacks are the least likely to vac amongst the population, but /r/BlackPeopleTwitter doesn't exempt it from being Reddit.

Humankind??? How sexist.

FDA is going to approve them anyway in the near future. We're going to be as fucked as Australia then.

12 years old is legal in some Western countries.

Never heard of that before for the West, which ones?

I'd be wary of caveats like age difference (e.g. 12 & 14 is vastly different than 12 & 30), or where national consent of age is overrode by state/prefecture laws (e.g. Japan IIRC).

I remember a similar topic being brought up before - https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12hRGwPnkt/please-update-your-wife-or-your-/c/

Brighton's changes were:

• Chestfeeding
• Human milk
• Birthing parent

Looking back on it, suggesting 'human' is unfriendly to otherkins and we should've torn them to shreds.

As already acknowledged then, both genders have breasts. That specific name change is retarded for more reasons than the usual.

This was his 'apology' - https://twitter.com/BNightengale/status/1424832587332128768

The #Rockies complete their investigation and find that no slur was used.I sincerely apologize for jumping to the wrong conclusion after the video. Unfortunately, after personally seeing the racism family/friends endure every damn day, it was too easy to believe it happened again

I believe the original Tweet was deleted, I'd like to hear the audio.

As some in the thread stated, he's a "journalist" and should do some research as per his job. Of course, as they also stated, he's a modern day journalist and can't be bothered to do that.

One mentioned that they did some research after seeing the clip to determine whether it was actually a slur, and concluded it was not, and if they could do it, a journalist should have that same capability.

It goes without saying that I wholeheartedly agree, but it is an article over 1 year old.

We should find more recent butcherings and signal boost those until thickheads learn this isn't an anomaly.

More bats courtesy of the experts in scamdemics:

• https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/marburg/index.html
• https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/marburg-virus-disease

As a general aside, now that we've induced mass hysteria and deteriorated a fair amount of trust/confidence in non-trivial portions of the general population for purposes of ballot stuffing and typical governmental power grab & corruption, it'd be pretty apt if an actual pandemic ala the bubonic plauge, smallpox, etc. hit us one day and tore through the population.

Not that my last paragraph necessarily has anything to do with the Marburg. Fun fact: They're ruminating on naming CPP virus strains after constellations once they conclude the Greek alphabet.

Yeah, Amy sucks massive dick. This would be a much more compelling thread if pretty much the entirety of the Supreme Court wasn't packed with activist justices who don't give a damn about the Constitution.

Don't worry, if it's not a cunt like ACB then it's a cuck like Kavanaugh; there's plenty more upcoming in the pipeline.

Wrong person to ask.

Submitter implied/asserted that while I said:

I don't watch Dr. Jester videos.

1. This forum isn't a shill for Breitbart. I don't see links to them often to begin with.
2. Rebel news articles have been linked, but thematically fit certain opinions already held by majority of users. I.e. even if they're Judaism fellatio enthusiasts, good luck tying coverage about things like mandatory lockdowns to the Jewish agenda.
3. Rarely see anything about Milo or Lauren. Again, this isn't the KIA2 sub-reddit. Why not complain about their content there?
4. AOV is not a mod here and thus his preferences somewhat don't matter; he did have a voice in the rule set, and the rules are pretty dumb and Redditesque (not to mention some redundancy to gov't laws and/or WIN ToS). Dom is the official resident janitorial bitch to complain to.
5. I don't watch Dr. Jester videos. If he's attacking Christianity but Dom is removing only anti-Jewish comments despite both breaking the same rule here, then that's unacceptable and needs to be fixed.*

We've had some anti-Jewish stuff left alone. We've also had some removed. I don't even look at the rule bar, but it is what it is. You can try some other options like voat.xyz if you want less censorship.

This is obviously not a free speech platform, but it's slightly more so than Reddit/Twitter/Facebook/etc., and less so than Voat/?? for better or worse.

* - Dom did multiple times in the past go AWOL and leave spam around for several days despite reports. He may have changed that.

Eh, Trump's pretty reliable when it comes to optics. It's not always traditional (see speaking style) but did you really think he'd turn down an opportunity to boast about his accomplishments? He was banging on about Warp Speed and how it was going to save "millions" of lives even last year during the debates...it's in his self-interest even without any plausible financial incentive.

Also, his base is Republican and unlike rabid Democrats, a fair bit of "conservatives" are pro-vaccine and condescending faggots that will say it's a matter of "life" and "above politics". I don't like either party, with the Democrats the least favorite, but at least they're willfully, brainlessly loyal to the donkey's hoof even as it's been plunged down their throats.

So while it's a partisan topic, the right-wing base is far more fickle.

A lot of people in that Twitter thread keep bringing up the gay wedding cake, but the owner didn't decline to bake a cake for gays, he refused certain messaging.

Using extreme rhetoric, someone brought up segregation yet was shot down by "civil rights". By that same token it's irritating to see everyone pretend we don't have laws for medical privacy...done intentionally for obvious reasons, but still annoying.

They seem quite intent at plowing through anyway with FDA legalization looming; not sure how it'll end up given the kangaroo courts. It'll end up mostly in lawyer pockets either way, but eh, have to make a moral stance somewhere. Now or never I guess.

More stick than carrot on the horizon - https://www.theepochtimes.com/companies-now-deducting-50-from-unvaccinated-workers-monthly-paychecks-consultancy-firm_3940800.html

Some employers are starting to tack on a $20 to $50 monthly surcharge to their unvaccinated workers, according to a health benefits consultant group.

It starts with an "honors system", but it'll bleed into more if you play by their rules. On last point, see some perspectives in https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jdEGlr5W/company-vaccine-mandates-what-ar/ as well.

Hook up the addicts to the governmental teats of welfare. Twentieth century+ politics in a nutshell.

I quit GameFAGs at least 6+ years ago (probably more). "Disputing" moderation was an exercise in futility decades ago, including CGayC for admin level contest, never mind what it derailed into.

Visited the site in recent years and it was a veritable shithole of leftist talking points, protests of "misogyny", "sexism" and all the typical gaming faggotry on top of the mess that you get with raw politics.

First example of vainglorious, unpaid janitors that I had the displeasure of encountering on the Internet.

I just hope he's OK. That Traitors of America list really rustled some feathers.