India’s Ivermectin Blackout
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
That's not true, but it has been spread around as factual since this all started so I don't blame you for thinking it's true.
There are some other sites as well that have been tracking it. Example - https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/epidemiologic-analyses-on-covid19-and-ivermectin/
People have bought the horse paste (it's cheaper than the water soluble) for < $10 since we're all animals and used them either on a weekly or monthly basis.
Durvet apple flavor is the most popular one, but it's been out of supplies in many places. You can still pick it up at Tractor Supply in person and some other retailers though.
Main thing is that if you don't get the Rx for human pills, which are probably more pure, make sure you get the dosage right. There are some charts out there with calculations but you can also do the math.
I've been thinking about buying it for a long time now but haven't gotten around to it. I plan to pick up the paste for emergency use eventually.
I wonder if they'll be brazen enough to begin talking about Ivermectin the day after the Pfizer injection receives full FDA approval next month.
Why would they start talking about it then?
Is it certain that it will be approved next month?
All the talk by news, leaders, msm, social media is that approval is just a formality at this point, De Blasio making the misnomer that the "voluntary phase" is over......which leads me to believe, with all of their blustering and threatening people to get the vax ahead of approval that the FDA is likely not going to approve it. I've played enough poker to recognize a bluff, but I could be wrong. Otherwise, why are they literally threatening unconstitutional acts ahead of approval. Why not wait for approval to give them added legal standing?
Feels like a bluff.
Makes sense. Also FDA approval would mean assuming liability, right? So it seems impossible they would assume liability for the Pharma companies, unless of course they paid off too, since it’s ultimately moving liability from Pharma to tax payers.
Liability is a complicated matter. Congress waived liability for the pharmaceuticals. If the FDA grants approval, I don't believe anyone assumes liability for adverse effects of the vax.
However, if the FDA approves the vax, then liability could be assumed by employers, but not in the manner you're thinking. Employers would likely be liable for having employees who are not vax "infecting" other people, never mind that the vaxed can also infect others. We live in clown world.
Noone is going to be liable for the vax injuring you. The Biden administration is considering changes in the way it reimbursed hospitals for treatment of the unvax. What that means, they didn't elaborate, but I would guess it means they won't. If the government won't reimburse that also means insurance companies will have standing to also not cover injuries from covid if the person is unvaxed, my guess.
Never happening.
Nah, if ivermectin works they'll flip one of the benzene rings, slap a new name on it, and sell it for $200 a pill. It may seem like a lot but don't worry the government will pay for it!
I haven't heard any credible sources reporting that the Pfucker jab is scheduled to be approved. All I've seen is the NYT article, and those fucks can tell me the sun rises in the west and sets in the east, and I'll still go out twice to verify.
Do you have a source?
Great article. Thanks
bigger reason is that big pharma couldnt reap big profit if cheap lisence free cure is available, one who orchestrated development of chinaflu and its spread certainly doesnt want all the work go in drain with cheap cure
More like big pharma doesnt want Trump to be right. Big pharma are true believers of progressivism
Their oral antiviral medicines are mutagenic... so they get to sell you cancer treatment 5-10 years later
They're just investing long-term.