Eh, Trump's pretty reliable when it comes to optics. It's not always traditional (see speaking style) but did you really think he'd turn down an opportunity to boast about his accomplishments? He was banging on about Warp Speed and how it was going to save "millions" of lives even last year during the debates...it's in his self-interest even without any plausible financial incentive.
Also, his base is Republican and unlike rabid Democrats, a fair bit of "conservatives" are pro-vaccine and condescending faggots that will say it's a matter of "life" and "above politics". I don't like either party, with the Democrats the least favorite, but at least they're willfully, brainlessly loyal to the donkey's hoof even as it's been plunged down their throats.
So while it's a partisan topic, the right-wing base is far more fickle.
You've got a few stupid opinions, but this one is easily your worst. These non-vaccines were only ever approved because big pharma conspired with government to freeze out safe, cheap, and effective pre-existing treatments. Now the FDA is preparing to fully approved the vaxx even as Pfizer admits to deliberately destroying their own control group in the first long-term trial. Their most recent study, 45k participants strong, showed similar death rates for both vaxxed and unvaxxed. Worse still, that death rate was insanely small - far lower than we've been led to believe by any previous "studies".
The virus isn't a hoax, but the vaccines absolutely fucking are. Because they aren't vaccines. The CDC admitted as much when they said that these injections are not sterilizing. The best you can claim about these shots is that they are insufficiently tested prophylactic treatments that have not demonstrated efficacy exceeding pre-existing treatment options, which are both safer and cheaper. They were only branded "vaccines" in order to skirt restrictions and, more importantly, to mislead the public into supporting mandate policies that are not appropriate for treatment options.
Calling this travesty a "very good thing" is idiotic.
These non-vaccines were only ever approved because big pharma conspired with government to freeze out safe, cheap, and effective pre-existing treatments.
These are not yet shown to work. I was hoping that the Bret Weinstein cure would lead to an egg on the face of the corrupt elites, but unfortunately, that turned out not to be the case.
Worse still, that death rate was insanely small - far lower than we've been led to believe by any previous "studies".
Not for older people.
The CDC admitted as much when they said that these injections are not sterilizing.
This is the strangest thing about all this. Has there ever been a 'vaccine' that did not prevent you from getting the vaccine, but only lowered the change of getting seriously ill? It's so crazy that I initially thought it was a nutjob conspiracy theory.
Well, see the problem is, in Current Climate(TM), you can call anything a "vaccine", even if it patently isn't one, and the public will just lap it up...
But point 2) Vaccines are usually for bacteria, not viruses. That is what they were originally developed to fight against, and what they are most effective at combatting...
Finally, vaccines are normally trialled over multiple years, and in multiple varied "treatment groups", of a sample size large enough to give results that can be extrapolated with a reasonable degree of accuracy to the whole population...
That usually takes AT LEAST 4 years, PER vaccine. None of these "vaccines", of which each major Big Pharmacorp seems to have an iteration, went through any of that, to any reasonable degree. Not a single one. So we don't even really KNOW how effective, or otherwise, they may be, at anything, because we, the great unwashed, ARE that sample group. We are the guinea pigs. And that, in essence, is one of the main problems with rushing all this shit, and with mandating, in any way, that people take the so-called "vaccines"...
So yeah.
Source: I'm literally an evolutionary biologist and a statistician, lol... I just haven't drunk the Koolaid, though I keep that to myself, mostly, obviously!
This doesn't seem true. Cowpox, virus. MMR, all three are viruses. Polio, virus. Pertussis is a bacteria, but it's the only vaccine that came to mind that is.
I'm not saying that vaccines for viruses don't exist - just that it is harder to produce an effective one, than for bacteria...
I may be slightly off track (I guess I was more looking towards antibiotics, which, as the name suggests, don't work for vaccines), but yes, you are right, we do have vaccines for a lot of that stuff, but they took many, many years to develop, and to successfully roll out, unlike (apparently) these "vaccines" for the sniffles...
I mean, we still don't even have effective vaccines against retroviruses (treatments, yes... Vaccines, no...) such as HIV, yet, so... I just don't believe that an effective "vax" against coof could have been properly developed, tested and sampled, in this time, no matter the apparent money and resources thrown at big pharma to that end...
But anyway, you've proven that I should probably do some more research, and get my facts a bit straighter, because I slightly mixed up two "facts", there, but my general point still stands.
And as for vaccines against the big baccies, as I was gesticulating at, here's a few I found at a glance: typhoid, tetanus, pneumococcus, meningococcus B, cholera, and fucking anthrax, of all things...
So sure, I was slightly off, when it comes to antiviral vaccines (apparently I need to study more human toxicology, instead of animals, lol...), but my general point is, I think, still fairly valid. But I admit you did find a flaw in my logic, so I stand corrected on that much.
Part B: Additional Remedies - Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages.
Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.
Well sir. See you on your new account! I’ve been banned from this “free” website for stating the exact same thing. Our side REALLY DOES lack the critical thinking the left says we do. We are no more or less brainwashed and in a cult than they are. These assholes in here trust a billionaire playboy who has spent 20yrs in pedo Hollywood and was their BEST FRIEND until he suddenly landed in the White House? Come on people....
I'm sure many here think Trump could be a shill or some kind of controlled opposition. We really have no idea, but the fact that this thread exists disproves your theory. Try again.
I don't think Trump meant because of the people deciding to take the "vaccines" but because they were available by choice and that then ruined the plans of the communist globalists for at least 5 years of lockdowns and then mandatory vaccines. Communists have no qualms of murdering useless eaters.
He has revealed himself to be a blatant shill. I wonder how many millions of dollars of pharma stock he holds.
He needs to completely fuck off from politics if he is not going to help the people stop these vax passports and employer mandates.
With this disgusting baseless comment he has demonstrated that he has become fully out of touch with his base.
Eh, Trump's pretty reliable when it comes to optics. It's not always traditional (see speaking style) but did you really think he'd turn down an opportunity to boast about his accomplishments? He was banging on about Warp Speed and how it was going to save "millions" of lives even last year during the debates...it's in his self-interest even without any plausible financial incentive.
Also, his base is Republican and unlike rabid Democrats, a fair bit of "conservatives" are pro-vaccine and condescending faggots that will say it's a matter of "life" and "above politics". I don't like either party, with the Democrats the least favorite, but at least they're willfully, brainlessly loyal to the donkey's hoof even as it's been plunged down their throats.
So while it's a partisan topic, the right-wing base is far more fickle.
Good lord I hate those people more than anybody.
His 'base', if you call yourself that, is completely divorced from reality.
I am by no means an unconditional Trump fan, nor a vaccine shill, but he did a very good thing with Warp Speed.
You've got a few stupid opinions, but this one is easily your worst. These non-vaccines were only ever approved because big pharma conspired with government to freeze out safe, cheap, and effective pre-existing treatments. Now the FDA is preparing to fully approved the vaxx even as Pfizer admits to deliberately destroying their own control group in the first long-term trial. Their most recent study, 45k participants strong, showed similar death rates for both vaxxed and unvaxxed. Worse still, that death rate was insanely small - far lower than we've been led to believe by any previous "studies".
The virus isn't a hoax, but the vaccines absolutely fucking are. Because they aren't vaccines. The CDC admitted as much when they said that these injections are not sterilizing. The best you can claim about these shots is that they are insufficiently tested prophylactic treatments that have not demonstrated efficacy exceeding pre-existing treatment options, which are both safer and cheaper. They were only branded "vaccines" in order to skirt restrictions and, more importantly, to mislead the public into supporting mandate policies that are not appropriate for treatment options.
Calling this travesty a "very good thing" is idiotic.
These are not yet shown to work. I was hoping that the Bret Weinstein cure would lead to an egg on the face of the corrupt elites, but unfortunately, that turned out not to be the case.
Not for older people.
This is the strangest thing about all this. Has there ever been a 'vaccine' that did not prevent you from getting the vaccine, but only lowered the change of getting seriously ill? It's so crazy that I initially thought it was a nutjob conspiracy theory.
Well, see the problem is, in Current Climate(TM), you can call anything a "vaccine", even if it patently isn't one, and the public will just lap it up...
But point 2) Vaccines are usually for bacteria, not viruses. That is what they were originally developed to fight against, and what they are most effective at combatting...
Finally, vaccines are normally trialled over multiple years, and in multiple varied "treatment groups", of a sample size large enough to give results that can be extrapolated with a reasonable degree of accuracy to the whole population...
That usually takes AT LEAST 4 years, PER vaccine. None of these "vaccines", of which each major Big Pharmacorp seems to have an iteration, went through any of that, to any reasonable degree. Not a single one. So we don't even really KNOW how effective, or otherwise, they may be, at anything, because we, the great unwashed, ARE that sample group. We are the guinea pigs. And that, in essence, is one of the main problems with rushing all this shit, and with mandating, in any way, that people take the so-called "vaccines"...
So yeah.
Source: I'm literally an evolutionary biologist and a statistician, lol... I just haven't drunk the Koolaid, though I keep that to myself, mostly, obviously!
Well sure, but are you a mod on a couple of small internet forums? Checkmate atheists!
This doesn't seem true. Cowpox, virus. MMR, all three are viruses. Polio, virus. Pertussis is a bacteria, but it's the only vaccine that came to mind that is.
I'm not saying that vaccines for viruses don't exist - just that it is harder to produce an effective one, than for bacteria...
I may be slightly off track (I guess I was more looking towards antibiotics, which, as the name suggests, don't work for vaccines), but yes, you are right, we do have vaccines for a lot of that stuff, but they took many, many years to develop, and to successfully roll out, unlike (apparently) these "vaccines" for the sniffles...
I mean, we still don't even have effective vaccines against retroviruses (treatments, yes... Vaccines, no...) such as HIV, yet, so... I just don't believe that an effective "vax" against coof could have been properly developed, tested and sampled, in this time, no matter the apparent money and resources thrown at big pharma to that end...
But anyway, you've proven that I should probably do some more research, and get my facts a bit straighter, because I slightly mixed up two "facts", there, but my general point still stands.
And as for vaccines against the big baccies, as I was gesticulating at, here's a few I found at a glance: typhoid, tetanus, pneumococcus, meningococcus B, cholera, and fucking anthrax, of all things...
So sure, I was slightly off, when it comes to antiviral vaccines (apparently I need to study more human toxicology, instead of animals, lol...), but my general point is, I think, still fairly valid. But I admit you did find a flaw in my logic, so I stand corrected on that much.
Total bullshit. Trump did not give them immunity, he did not have that power. Congress did in 1986 --> https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
Excerpt from bill:
Part B: Additional Remedies - Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages. Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.
When has he stood up against employer mandates and vaccine passports?
This is the only issue that matters right now. It will never stop if they can brute force enough compliance by using the stick.
If he is going to brag about his worst "achievement" and not say a word arguing against mandates and passports then he is useless.
Don't just assume he has purely benign intentions when he is behaving like this.
Well sir. See you on your new account! I’ve been banned from this “free” website for stating the exact same thing. Our side REALLY DOES lack the critical thinking the left says we do. We are no more or less brainwashed and in a cult than they are. These assholes in here trust a billionaire playboy who has spent 20yrs in pedo Hollywood and was their BEST FRIEND until he suddenly landed in the White House? Come on people....
I'm sure many here think Trump could be a shill or some kind of controlled opposition. We really have no idea, but the fact that this thread exists disproves your theory. Try again.
People who randomly BOLD things come off like MENTAL patients.
You're in KIA2, not TDW. Calm the hell down.
https://archive.is/9Dumw
Odd how Bernie accepted all that big pharma cash. Maybe universal healthcare isn’t going to be as sweet a deal as the retards believe.
I just want to see how the TDS victims react.
I don't think Trump meant because of the people deciding to take the "vaccines" but because they were available by choice and that then ruined the plans of the communist globalists for at least 5 years of lockdowns and then mandatory vaccines. Communists have no qualms of murdering useless eaters.