You've got a few stupid opinions, but this one is easily your worst. These non-vaccines were only ever approved because big pharma conspired with government to freeze out safe, cheap, and effective pre-existing treatments. Now the FDA is preparing to fully approved the vaxx even as Pfizer admits to deliberately destroying their own control group in the first long-term trial. Their most recent study, 45k participants strong, showed similar death rates for both vaxxed and unvaxxed. Worse still, that death rate was insanely small - far lower than we've been led to believe by any previous "studies".
The virus isn't a hoax, but the vaccines absolutely fucking are. Because they aren't vaccines. The CDC admitted as much when they said that these injections are not sterilizing. The best you can claim about these shots is that they are insufficiently tested prophylactic treatments that have not demonstrated efficacy exceeding pre-existing treatment options, which are both safer and cheaper. They were only branded "vaccines" in order to skirt restrictions and, more importantly, to mislead the public into supporting mandate policies that are not appropriate for treatment options.
Calling this travesty a "very good thing" is idiotic.
These non-vaccines were only ever approved because big pharma conspired with government to freeze out safe, cheap, and effective pre-existing treatments.
These are not yet shown to work. I was hoping that the Bret Weinstein cure would lead to an egg on the face of the corrupt elites, but unfortunately, that turned out not to be the case.
Worse still, that death rate was insanely small - far lower than we've been led to believe by any previous "studies".
Not for older people.
The CDC admitted as much when they said that these injections are not sterilizing.
This is the strangest thing about all this. Has there ever been a 'vaccine' that did not prevent you from getting the vaccine, but only lowered the change of getting seriously ill? It's so crazy that I initially thought it was a nutjob conspiracy theory.
Well, see the problem is, in Current Climate(TM), you can call anything a "vaccine", even if it patently isn't one, and the public will just lap it up...
But point 2) Vaccines are usually for bacteria, not viruses. That is what they were originally developed to fight against, and what they are most effective at combatting...
Finally, vaccines are normally trialled over multiple years, and in multiple varied "treatment groups", of a sample size large enough to give results that can be extrapolated with a reasonable degree of accuracy to the whole population...
That usually takes AT LEAST 4 years, PER vaccine. None of these "vaccines", of which each major Big Pharmacorp seems to have an iteration, went through any of that, to any reasonable degree. Not a single one. So we don't even really KNOW how effective, or otherwise, they may be, at anything, because we, the great unwashed, ARE that sample group. We are the guinea pigs. And that, in essence, is one of the main problems with rushing all this shit, and with mandating, in any way, that people take the so-called "vaccines"...
So yeah.
Source: I'm literally an evolutionary biologist and a statistician, lol... I just haven't drunk the Koolaid, though I keep that to myself, mostly, obviously!
This doesn't seem true. Cowpox, virus. MMR, all three are viruses. Polio, virus. Pertussis is a bacteria, but it's the only vaccine that came to mind that is.
Part B: Additional Remedies - Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages.
Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.
His 'base', if you call yourself that, is completely divorced from reality.
I am by no means an unconditional Trump fan, nor a vaccine shill, but he did a very good thing with Warp Speed.
You've got a few stupid opinions, but this one is easily your worst. These non-vaccines were only ever approved because big pharma conspired with government to freeze out safe, cheap, and effective pre-existing treatments. Now the FDA is preparing to fully approved the vaxx even as Pfizer admits to deliberately destroying their own control group in the first long-term trial. Their most recent study, 45k participants strong, showed similar death rates for both vaxxed and unvaxxed. Worse still, that death rate was insanely small - far lower than we've been led to believe by any previous "studies".
The virus isn't a hoax, but the vaccines absolutely fucking are. Because they aren't vaccines. The CDC admitted as much when they said that these injections are not sterilizing. The best you can claim about these shots is that they are insufficiently tested prophylactic treatments that have not demonstrated efficacy exceeding pre-existing treatment options, which are both safer and cheaper. They were only branded "vaccines" in order to skirt restrictions and, more importantly, to mislead the public into supporting mandate policies that are not appropriate for treatment options.
Calling this travesty a "very good thing" is idiotic.
These are not yet shown to work. I was hoping that the Bret Weinstein cure would lead to an egg on the face of the corrupt elites, but unfortunately, that turned out not to be the case.
Not for older people.
This is the strangest thing about all this. Has there ever been a 'vaccine' that did not prevent you from getting the vaccine, but only lowered the change of getting seriously ill? It's so crazy that I initially thought it was a nutjob conspiracy theory.
Well, see the problem is, in Current Climate(TM), you can call anything a "vaccine", even if it patently isn't one, and the public will just lap it up...
But point 2) Vaccines are usually for bacteria, not viruses. That is what they were originally developed to fight against, and what they are most effective at combatting...
Finally, vaccines are normally trialled over multiple years, and in multiple varied "treatment groups", of a sample size large enough to give results that can be extrapolated with a reasonable degree of accuracy to the whole population...
That usually takes AT LEAST 4 years, PER vaccine. None of these "vaccines", of which each major Big Pharmacorp seems to have an iteration, went through any of that, to any reasonable degree. Not a single one. So we don't even really KNOW how effective, or otherwise, they may be, at anything, because we, the great unwashed, ARE that sample group. We are the guinea pigs. And that, in essence, is one of the main problems with rushing all this shit, and with mandating, in any way, that people take the so-called "vaccines"...
So yeah.
Source: I'm literally an evolutionary biologist and a statistician, lol... I just haven't drunk the Koolaid, though I keep that to myself, mostly, obviously!
Well sure, but are you a mod on a couple of small internet forums? Checkmate atheists!
This doesn't seem true. Cowpox, virus. MMR, all three are viruses. Polio, virus. Pertussis is a bacteria, but it's the only vaccine that came to mind that is.
Total bullshit. Trump did not give them immunity, he did not have that power. Congress did in 1986 --> https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
Excerpt from bill:
Part B: Additional Remedies - Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages. Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.