Am I the only one who thinks they are doing whatever they can to keep the economy trudging along in a borderline zombie state so they can pull the plug if they fail to rig it to keep Trump out?

That's the crazy part about it. Many turbo leftoids despise Israel, but dare hint at widespread and inordinate Jewish influence in America and elsewhere and their NPC programming switches on and they flip shit and call you anti semitic.

Fortunately all the replies I see are shitting on them for it.

Banks don't have that much cash on hand

They absolutely have way more than $3000 on hand at any given time.

Withdrawing more than $100 in physical cash WILL get the government sticking its dick in your private transaction.

Not even remotely true in my state. I withdraw more than that once or twice per month. What shithole do you live in?

Tbh I know two people who are really into 40k and one is full blown NPC and the other is NPC lite. Both have played for years. Perhaps exceptions that don't disprove the rule.

Is it even a leftist insult? I hear it far more often used in right leaning circles to describe male feminists. If the shoe fits...

I remember that line being a thing as early as 2007 or so. Likely earlier than that. They clearly lifted it from something pre-existing.

I refuse to believe that's what google translate spat out for we wuz kangz lmfao that's great

NHL 2004 is to this day the only mainline sports game I've ever played (save for stuff like Wii Sports that I put in a different category). My dad and I would play each other all the time back in the day. Never touched any other modes.

where they can be mother and CEO at the same time and no one question about how they can manage it all

LMAO

I find the random black hand on the dude's shoulder just as hilarious as the other retarded shit in this image.

Can anyone point me in the direction of this training manual? Tried to find it before but failed.

Yeah, obviously it would be great to have my cake and eat it too, but in my opinion it is better to have decent graphics but spend the lion's share of budget on other things than to have amazing state of the art graphics and skimp on other shit.

I've seen a bunch of pro Jewish billboards pop up in my area over the past several months. Stuff like "50% of all hate crimes are committed against jews" and other similar shit.

Japan already has a fair amount of delicious kebab shops in my experience. Run by immigrants as it is though so already lost that one...

Ahh yes, young brainwashed Japanese woman says Japan has things to gain from muh diversity and its suddenly case closed and anyone who says otherwise is an ignorant nazi gaijin bigot.

You see this shit all the time in circles related to Japanese shit. People are debating something and the second someone comes in with the opinion of a Japanese person they act like it is the word of God that can't be disputed, despite it being directly at odds with what countless other Japanese people say.

Dude appeared out of the ether one day and was billed as some right leaning dude but I've seen him do nothing but suck off globohomo.

Economics is subtractive, because resources are finite, if in some cases expandable.

And, in the context of this discussion, the lion's share of the resources needed to sustain a life are indeed expandable unless you live in some shithole in Africa or somewhere that the local environment is not suitable to sustain the number of people living there.

It's just a statistical fact. Most people are useless eaters. 90% of more of people on this continent do nothing but consume in their lifetimes.

Sure, way less people are needed to produce food and other things. I would agree that a huge portion of people are useless drains on society. The part that isn't fact is just how widely and broadly you are casting that net.

Because by having three children he'd have done the same in any other profession to boot, while contributing more positively.

I would agree that having children of one's own, especially if one is fit to be a good parent, is a fast track to being a positive contributor. But we aren't talking about contributing "more positively" or "the most positively," you made a sweeping statement about how one couldn't contribute a net positive at all unless they were a genius. Perhaps pedantic, but that is what I was taking issue with.

Teachers are especially of negative economic value(almost as much as office workers), their positive contributions largely theoretical while their profession on the whole constantly claims themselves indespensible.

I agree that public school systems and the vast majority of educational institutions are complete dogshit and net negatives overall. But that doesn't preclude there from being good individuals within those institutions that are net positives. Even looking back on my 17 years in that bullshit, there were some gems sprinkled among the shit that shined despite the shitty system they worked in.

Regarding the collapse of clown world, it depends how exactly it all goes down. If it is a true collapse of grand proportions, the death and suffering is going to be widespread among the useful and the useless alike during the initial shock. Over time there would be a re-orienting of society to be much more meritocratic, and surely the truly useful would be more likely to survive this as you say.

But "usefulness" in a hand to mouth society that is just trying to survive is a much more rigid thing than it is in a society with much excess like the current clown world.

For example, an electrical engineer that excels at his job but works at a company that produces gadgets that ultimately are not necessary might be a net negative in the holistic and transcendental sense in terms of survival. But in a situation where the societal fat is greatly trimmed down, one could imagine them potentially turning around to use their skills to support something much more close to fundamental necessities like power infrastructure or agricultural equipment. But just because they aren't doing that now, doesn't make them useless or a net negative provided whichever devices they have a hand in making are positive and not socially destructive.

This seems like a futile endeavor because the concept itself is self evident even when speaking generally, but I'll humor you.

Thinking of a friend of mine who is giga based and is a teacher. Given that he works amongst commie scum, if even a few of the thousands of students he teaches over his career is positively influenced, assuming the others aren't influenced negatively, then he's done his part.

Afterwards we can discuss the sheer amount of resources that a single human life costs over their lifetime

Spoken like a commie. Resources that, for the intents and purposes of this discussion, are not finite and of which more can be produced.

If you can't see how there are plenty of other ways to be a net positive for society, I'm not sure how to get it through to you. People who produce food, build things, maintain critical infrastructures of a whole host of industries, the list goes on.

Sure, there are plenty of useless paper pushing jobs that probably shouldn't exist and don't really contribute much. But the notion that you have to be a super genius to contribute positively is bizarre, and that's coming from someone who is very adamant that people should strive to have kids despite the societal deck being steeply stacked against men.

If you aren't having children, the only way you're contributing to society is if you're a Tesla level genius inventor.

Okay, it seems we broadly agree on a lot here but this is a bit ridiculous. I want kids very badly and I'm young enough that realistically I will probably have them down the line, but the notion that you have to be Newton level to contribute to society is retarded. Be a good influence in your community, for your nieces, nephews, cousins, etc. and that is absolutely a positive contribution to society.

I wouldn't say that's necessarily the implication they are trying to make. Moreso they seem to be clapping back at someone trotting out the "my grandfather liberated the camps and saw the horrors" shtick. I think it's perfectly reasonable to point out if a significant portion of that is due to logistic failures caused by war.

In general, I despise when leftoids, or anyone really, creates a term that labels a position on an issue and simply use that term to stifle any and all discussion on the issue by merely using the label as an argument itself. "Holocaust denier" "Anti-vaxxer" Hell, even "Flat Earther." Pure NPC useful idiot behavior.

You know how many times I've seen Edward from Twilight? Precisely zero because I never watched the movie. It's that simple.

And I guarantee if I did see it I would think nothing of it because I'm not a little bitch.

It's almost like women enjoy seeing gigachad men while men enjoy seeing cute and helpless girls with skimpy clothes. What a revelation. I know you're a troll but you can do better.