Majority of Americans now support mass deportation
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
42% of democrats? That implies no more than like 65% of Republicans. The bigger issue is why do less than 99% of so called "conservatives" support mass deportation?
https://www.axios.com/2024/04/25/trump-biden-americans-illegal-immigration-poll
68% but you are completely correct.
Bigger deal IMHO:
The funniest part though is this:
Latinos support mass deportation more than blacks. I struggle understand that but I guess it's just generations and genrations of "do Democrat thing because they say so."
Important to note and specifically refute the lie that "Birthright citizenship" is guaranteed by the 14th amendment.
No sane person looking at the 14th amendment would understand that either the language or the spirit of the 14th amendment is meant to apply to people specifically crawling over the border to birth their spawn on American soil.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/
It is in fact possible for congresscritters in the 1860s to be incredibly short-sighted my dude.
Using smug Chapo speak doesn't make you right even if you're convinced you are.
You read "born in" skipped "under the jurisdiction thereof" (probably because you misinterpreted it) and came up with birthright citizenship.
Obviously there is room for some change here, like how illegal immigrants who haven't become citizens themselves would be "subjects of foreign States"
Someone already 110% correctly called it out, but the whole 14th Amendment thing is absolute bullshit propaganda, like with a lot of what these fuckers try to pull. It's amazing how they care so much about specific amendments when it suits them, but completely ignore a bunch of the big ones like 1A, 2A, 4A, 10A (they flipflop on this one big time though) and so on.
"Subject to the jurisdiction thereof" is huge, and cannot be applied to illegal invaders. The whole reason it was worded that was, as I recall, was to not provide birthright citizenship. This barred people like the American-born children of foreign diplomats from instantly becoming US citizens. The idea that the same amendment means if a pregnant illegal sneaks across the border and pops out a baby they're Americans is absurd on its face.
The 14th also talks about protecting the rights of specifically American citizens.
TL;DR: They're lying about the 14th Amendment. This is not shocking, and is par for the course.
If you compare it to the percentage that is liberal/conservative, black Democrats are the most conservative and white Democrats the least.
90% of blacks vote Democrat, but 60% oppose common sense. 40% of whites vote Democrat, but 44% oppose common sense.
This fits well with polls showing that white liberals are more liberal on race issues than actual minorities.
That number likely includes latinos who were naturalized and granted citizenship. People who enter through proper channels really resent wetbacks and illegals of every stripe.
Legal immigration had quotas for a reason. Properly functioning legal immigration is tolerable. "It's legal because fed said so" is not that.
Way to be full retard and throw unrelated straw positions around, goon. No, corps aren't people.
Stop with the "neo-cons right wing (they aren't) therefore go full nazi" schtick before you even start with me, dimwit. All leftists deserve the rope.
Quotas, or LIMITATIONS, you dimwit - exist to prevent immigration from doing what we see now, where enough immigrants come in that they form their own miniature regions, states within a state that prevent assimmilation. Quotas also exist to ensure that immigrants never reach a significant percentage of the population by factoring in their pop. growth rates to ensure they're lower than natives. Strictly limited immigration far below what we have now is useful to facilitate trade and allow the host nation to acquire technology from the immigrants.
We do need mass deportation of the useless invaders, my post was explaining why immigration wasn't a huge problem a hundred years ago when we had quotas. Those quotas are commonly decried as "racist" by leftist dimwits in education, when everyone discussing the issue should understand the real reasons they were in place. Because arguing for quota immigration is more effective than absolutist positions that reject logic like yours, and it's a useful tool to destroy the racism fallacious argument leftists like to throw around.