Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

90
Majority of Americans now support mass deportation (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by Ahaus667 1 year ago by Ahaus667 +91 / -1
98 comments share
98 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
▲ 23 ▼
– truenationalist 23 points 1 year ago +23 / -0

Important to note and specifically refute the lie that "Birthright citizenship" is guaranteed by the 14th amendment.

No sane person looking at the 14th amendment would understand that either the language or the spirit of the 14th amendment is meant to apply to people specifically crawling over the border to birth their spawn on American soil.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– chugga_fan 0 points 1 year ago +6 / -6

Important to note and specifically refute the lie that "Birthright citizenship" is guaranteed by the 14th amendment

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/

It is in fact possible for congresscritters in the 1860s to be incredibly short-sighted my dude.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MLGS 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Using smug Chapo speak doesn't make you right even if you're convinced you are.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– chugga_fan 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

"Chapo speak". Have you ever actually analyzed a document before? It's quite clear that the exception is there because of diplomatic immunity, as ambassadors are traditionally the only people who are not subject to the laws of the state in which they reside, which is why ambassadors can be expelled but not prosecuted without having their immunity stripped by their home country.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MLGS 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Shut up, dipshit.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 4 ▼
– LauriThorne 4 points 1 year ago +5 / -1

You read "born in" skipped "under the jurisdiction thereof" (probably because you misinterpreted it) and came up with birthright citizenship.

The Slaughter-House Cases

In the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36 (1873)[b]—a civil rights case not dealing specifically with birthright citizenship—a majority of the Supreme Court mentioned in passing that "the phrase 'subject to its jurisdiction' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States".

Obviously there is room for some change here, like how illegal immigrants who haven't become citizens themselves would be "subjects of foreign States"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– chugga_fan 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

You quite literally quote the same cases that are the basis of why I'm telling you that you are incorrect.

It is quite obvious that they were solely there because diplomatic immunity is such that they are effectively unable to be prosecuted by the home countries laws if they are an ambassador (if you don't want to piss the other country off).

It is, in fact, quite possible that the entire Lincoln and post-Lincoln administration is made up of retards and the denial of this is quite astonishing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LauriThorne 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You're not very bright, are you? You actually think they repeated themselves by saying "the phrase 'subject to its jurisdiction' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States".

Do you know how lists work?

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - t4mxf (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy