When looking at the totality of achievements of Western science and art, Jews really aren't over-represented.
Tell us more about the before time, in the long, long ago.
I'll check it out only for the meme potential. It already gave us a solid one with the "What kind of American are you?" line.
I agree regarding DDG but it's up to OP to do his research. The Mullvad browser is brand new, launched just a few months ago.
Some resources for your consideration:
https://reclaimthenet.org/private-web-browsers
https://www.privacyguides.org/en/tools/
I also highly recommend this book:
It's not quite the evidence you're looking for but that OkCupid data that was released a few years ago showed white men to be the most contacted on that site by women of all races. Asian men and black women were the least contacted group.
I guess 19th century white men are cool again?
And then the Romans conquered them, converted them to Christianity, and over the next thousand years those Europeans built the most advanced civilization the world has ever seen.
I hate to be the AKSHUALLY guy but the conversion of Rome to Christianity directly precedes the Western Empire's gradual conquest by pagan barbarians.
My understanding of what people from that time thought of "Christine Jorgensen" was that they considered him a harmless, even amusing oddity, like a monkey on roller skates.
AoV doing his best to invoke the "I gradually began to hate them" meme in people with his antics.
I assume the trad wives thing is just women with affluent husbands who realized they can flex on other women that they don't have to work.
Whenever I hear libertarianism I think of this:
Applying our theory to parents and children, this means that a parent does not have the right to aggress against his children, but also that the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights. The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die. The law, therefore, may not properly compel the parent to feed a child or to keep it alive.
-Murray Rothbard’s The Ethics of Liberty
I consider there to be very little difference between the government, non-profits, and private business at this point. They say the same things, receive money from the same sources, and cover for each when the need arises.
I'm cool with that as long it's okay for another company to only hire white men if the company so desires to...yes, I know she won't like that
Not quite. PCA charts put Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews genetically between Europeans and Middle Eastern populations like Palestinians and Jordanians. In other words, they're a highly mixed group they have been endogamous for many centuries.
Culturally, they long dissociated themselves from larger European (i.e. white) society and ethnic groups. Cases in point
"Jews as whites" is rather recent phenomenon that is used very selectively by somes Jews when it suits them.
But you are correct that they are promoting their own demise in the long run via their collective decisions.
Friend, we're discussing the same point from different angles.
No we're not.
If they want to change things because of the perpetual advancement of todayism, they'll have to change everything.
Yes they are very, very comfortable with this fact. They would readily admit this. These people have constantly said they want to change everything including the past.
If they're looking through today's lens back at the past, and found them to be progressive and woke, then it should also be fine and not require any changes.
Again, for the third time, some piece of media can be progressive for its own time and yet not progressive enough by ours. They change even the older progressive things because again, they are not progressive enough.
So they're liars, or they lie about it
Yes, but they are not lying about this. There is nothing contradictory, even in their own ideology, about this. It's even in the their name progressives. I cannot be anymore clear about this.
Again, yes they can. I repeat:
Something could be very progressive or liberal or whatever you want to call it for its own time, but through changes in society, media, etc., be definitely illiberal or unprogressive by more recent "standards."
If it was fine, they would not complain and demand it be changed. If it's not fine, why change it? They said it was always woke and progressive.
Since when are the people in question every satisfied with things as they were in the past? That's a large part of what makes them progressives. Again, some piece of media can be progressive for its own time and yet not progressive enough by ours. They change even the older progressive things because again, they are not progressive enough.
I don't see how they are. Something could be very progressive or liberal or whatever you want to call it for its own time, but through changes in society, media, etc., be definitely illiberal or unprogressive by more recent "standards."
Fair enough. Comment removed.
"...beginning to..."
It's been crumbling for decades
What the fuck is this verbal diarrhea?
Don't forget who you are conversing with here...that's kind of his specialty.
They also have a Patreon account. Apparently receiving more than $2400 a month.
The organization in question:
Thanks for letting us know what the plebes think.
The OJ trial was definitely a significant racial (re-)awakening moment for many white people.