Funny enough, I used to date a broke ass South American dude. He was the type who just did not have it in him to do crime. I swear to god, he is a bit of a weird person and can come off like he was not made for this world, but he is the single most harmless creature ever.
They thrive on the attention.
People like him — as well as all the other rich black athletes in popular sports and entertainment — simply want the praise and attention that's concomitant to supporting the black community, without actually supporting the black community.
They're more than aware that any white fans in their respective audiences are unable to do anything other than tune out. Even then, much like those who speak out against this racist tribalism, they'll still label those who do as racist as well.
For them it's a win/win kafkatrap.
If you speak out, then they can claim, "See? This is the kind of anti-black talk we deal with all the time! They just feel their power is threatened!"
If you tune out, they can claim, "See? They don't want to face the reality of their racism — why else wouldn't they support black lives?"
Meanwhile, they're some of the richest and most privileged people to ever exist; yet, they refuse to take their money and influence into their local impoverished black communities in order to truly try to make any sort of meaningful difference. The places where crime is astronomically high and where they could truly help are left wanting — all while they pat themselves on the back for a job well done.
They're content with just pretending because it exclusively benefits them without having to do any actual work to make progress.
Eh, NASCAR road courses are somehow more boring than the superspeedway ovals. Probably because there's less passing and the restrictor plates mean you can't even take that much advantage from being a better driver
No, Leftists and the sexually inflated bio-Leninist women & their army of beta cucks is partly responsible for this. There's a huge fucking difference.
BLM is a National Socialist movement whose theories are based in Marxism. Most of the things that have fallen to the left did not fall because 'women'. They over 100 years ago because of the amount of Fabian Socialist men directly involved in re-structuring society in such a way as to gain themselves significant power through corporatism. Women's issues were, and always have been, a wedge issue and an excuse by Fabians and Leftists to seize ever more control.
You name a left-wing movement, they're front and center using it to dehumanize men somehow.
Because the connotations of masculinity, particularly rugged individualism, is diametrically opposed to the authoritarianism necessary for control by Fabians and Corporatists. Left-wing movements are highly authoritarian. Social wedge issues have always been exploited by Leftists & revolutionary communists as a means to push for more authoritarianism. None of the elites or governing structures give a single fuck about women, and they certainly don't care about men. The purpose is for the acquisition of further power.
Even gay rights, which was a majority male movement, got co-opted and used for their ends to the point that it got a new title that put them first.
It wasn't co-opted for the use of women, it was always in service of the use of Marxists.
I'm just making a lot of connections between certain events that have happened and claims their groups made in the past. I'd like to be wrong, and every so often I see something that makes me wonder if I am, but then I see something which confirms even my most questionable of ideas soon after.
Yes, yes, it's the same "pattern recognition" excuse that antisemites use. If jew present, then blame jews. You're just doing it with women. You're looking for affirmation and yelling "EVERY. SINGLE. TIME." You're not trying to test your own hypothesize it. You're not trying to falsify it, because you don't want it to be false. It's easier to just believe an entire sex... literally the only other one, and the one that bares children, just literally hates the entire other sex and is working as a cabal to destroy the sex that they literally need to reproduce.
Again, this is entirely ridiculous identitarian totalitarianism. I've heard the same idiotic shit from Rad Fems about men, and why the world hates women and kills them off. It's patent nonsense.
Indie games were literally patient zero of the SJW/Female supremacist/Progressive curse. I'm not sure why you'd think they'd be better now.
No, journalism was patient zero. Show me all of the wildly successful Leftist indie games that drove the entire industry to accept progressivism. That didn't happen. Game Journalists, who were mostly men and left-wing pushed a concentration of power & gate-keeping in order to protect their failing industry in the face of video content creators who were better at showing people games than the journalists. The journalists, adopting Marxist tactics of creating identity groups & balkanizing populations into easily governable segments then waged a PR & Identity war against their own audiences. They used their power and influence in reporting outlets, among developers, and within internet forums, to purge their political opposition.
It had nothing to do with women beyond the fact that progressive game journos were sleazy frauds who fucked female bio-Leninist failures like ZQ. Feminism was a wedge issue that served no other purpose than to seize power.
Do you have a race track near where you live? Do you IRL know someone who races you could throw some coin at as a sponsor? Whatever money you would spend on watching pro racing would go a lot further given to a local driver.
Something I find myself thinking a lot is "less Little League, more Sandlot". We as a people have lost the ability to self-organize, despite it never being easier to do so. It's a skill I think we need to re-learn, because I don't see the current situation of us being "strangers in a strange land" changing anytime soon.
I can tell you why I still watch...because several other drivers have actually resisted this nonsense and been willing to answer for it. Sure, they aren't perfect and I haven't picked into every one of their political views, but I have no problem standing tall and supporting a sport that allows their guys to open defend NOT kneeling in support of violence and politicization of their sport. Because if I look around, that's something in short supply.
Most of the time I just pretend Mercedes isn't in the race anyway. It's a lot more fun that way. If they are top of the podium I don't care to watch the podium ceremony.
I've never liked Hamilton, because he's always been all about nothing but seeking more attention. I've never felt like he was genuine, but instead would do anything for social media points. I laughed my ass off when the penalties worked so hard against him last week.
Who has from the current grid has resisted it? I haven't followed F1 at all this year so I'm not up on this stuff. Props to them I guess.
Regarding Hamilton - I tried to ignore his antics in the past and just respect him for being a really good driver, but in the past couple years he's just become insufferable. I was sure once all this BLM stuff kicked into high gear he would be all over it.
Charles LeClerc probably the most vocal about it. He defended himself online after being called a racist for not kneeling and said he didn't support the protests having turned violent or that politicians were using the protest for political purposes.
Magnussen said something along the lines of he didn't want to support the BLM political organization. Verstappen I can't remember exactly but I think he at least implied that the kneeling antics were an empty gesture.
This all with Hamilton droning on about how all the other sports are having their unified gestures and whining that F1 isn't following suit. His complaining has not really worked though because a decent amount of the grid doesn't seem all that interested in it. Honestly, I think if Hamilton wasn't in F1 they might not have even done anything at all, he's the one pushing it all.
On the other hand, I don't fuck drug dealers who get me killed. White privilege or simply not being raised as a good for nothing criminal-lover?
That just leaves interracial relationships then, because dating non-rich black dudes will almost always get you in that spot.
Funny enough, I used to date a broke ass South American dude. He was the type who just did not have it in him to do crime. I swear to god, he is a bit of a weird person and can come off like he was not made for this world, but he is the single most harmless creature ever.
Black Nationalism is a global force to be reckon with. And he owns everything he has to a White created circus-sport.
Black National Socialism is only a force to be reckoned with if it gets the permission of the Left-Wing corporatists to destroy us.
We shall see if they shall do what the globalists did in Germany, and let the wolves into the hen house.
They thrive on the attention.
People like him — as well as all the other rich black athletes in popular sports and entertainment — simply want the praise and attention that's concomitant to supporting the black community, without actually supporting the black community.
They're more than aware that any white fans in their respective audiences are unable to do anything other than tune out. Even then, much like those who speak out against this racist tribalism, they'll still label those who do as racist as well.
For them it's a win/win kafkatrap.
If you speak out, then they can claim, "See? This is the kind of anti-black talk we deal with all the time! They just feel their power is threatened!"
If you tune out, they can claim, "See? They don't want to face the reality of their racism — why else wouldn't they support black lives?"
Meanwhile, they're some of the richest and most privileged people to ever exist; yet, they refuse to take their money and influence into their local impoverished black communities in order to truly try to make any sort of meaningful difference. The places where crime is astronomically high and where they could truly help are left wanting — all while they pat themselves on the back for a job well done.
They're content with just pretending because it exclusively benefits them without having to do any actual work to make progress.
If you have no police, who's going to arrest them?
If I was a Mercedes exec I would want this guy's head.
Can somebody black pill me on Breonna Taylor? This one was pretty off my radar when it happened.
Didn't he shoot at the cops first?
Who's that?
lewis hamilton, f1 driver and 6 time world champion
oh, those faggy little european airplane cars. gotcha.
How dare you use that langu-
PSYCH
I DON'T FUCKING CARE HA HA HA
Eh, NASCAR road courses are somehow more boring than the superspeedway ovals. Probably because there's less passing and the restrictor plates mean you can't even take that much advantage from being a better driver
arrest the nigga dealing drugs
F1 died when they got rid of the v10 cars.
I don't know.
Why do you?
You'd be better off driving an amateur course for yourself. Or even just playing a racing game with all of us here.
I think you are strawmanning women into a boogey-man that you can rationalize your attitudes over.
You need to stop spending money on corporate products. You'll do a lot better with independent companies and development,
No, Leftists and the sexually inflated bio-Leninist women & their army of beta cucks is partly responsible for this. There's a huge fucking difference.
I wish you were wrong. But it's all so insidiously interconnected.
BLM is a National Socialist movement whose theories are based in Marxism. Most of the things that have fallen to the left did not fall because 'women'. They over 100 years ago because of the amount of Fabian Socialist men directly involved in re-structuring society in such a way as to gain themselves significant power through corporatism. Women's issues were, and always have been, a wedge issue and an excuse by Fabians and Leftists to seize ever more control.
Because the connotations of masculinity, particularly rugged individualism, is diametrically opposed to the authoritarianism necessary for control by Fabians and Corporatists. Left-wing movements are highly authoritarian. Social wedge issues have always been exploited by Leftists & revolutionary communists as a means to push for more authoritarianism. None of the elites or governing structures give a single fuck about women, and they certainly don't care about men. The purpose is for the acquisition of further power.
It wasn't co-opted for the use of women, it was always in service of the use of Marxists.
Yes, yes, it's the same "pattern recognition" excuse that antisemites use. If jew present, then blame jews. You're just doing it with women. You're looking for affirmation and yelling "EVERY. SINGLE. TIME." You're not trying to test your own hypothesize it. You're not trying to falsify it, because you don't want it to be false. It's easier to just believe an entire sex... literally the only other one, and the one that bares children, just literally hates the entire other sex and is working as a cabal to destroy the sex that they literally need to reproduce.
Again, this is entirely ridiculous identitarian totalitarianism. I've heard the same idiotic shit from Rad Fems about men, and why the world hates women and kills them off. It's patent nonsense.
No, journalism was patient zero. Show me all of the wildly successful Leftist indie games that drove the entire industry to accept progressivism. That didn't happen. Game Journalists, who were mostly men and left-wing pushed a concentration of power & gate-keeping in order to protect their failing industry in the face of video content creators who were better at showing people games than the journalists. The journalists, adopting Marxist tactics of creating identity groups & balkanizing populations into easily governable segments then waged a PR & Identity war against their own audiences. They used their power and influence in reporting outlets, among developers, and within internet forums, to purge their political opposition.
It had nothing to do with women beyond the fact that progressive game journos were sleazy frauds who fucked female bio-Leninist failures like ZQ. Feminism was a wedge issue that served no other purpose than to seize power.
Do you have a race track near where you live? Do you IRL know someone who races you could throw some coin at as a sponsor? Whatever money you would spend on watching pro racing would go a lot further given to a local driver.
Something I find myself thinking a lot is "less Little League, more Sandlot". We as a people have lost the ability to self-organize, despite it never being easier to do so. It's a skill I think we need to re-learn, because I don't see the current situation of us being "strangers in a strange land" changing anytime soon.
I can tell you why I still watch...because several other drivers have actually resisted this nonsense and been willing to answer for it. Sure, they aren't perfect and I haven't picked into every one of their political views, but I have no problem standing tall and supporting a sport that allows their guys to open defend NOT kneeling in support of violence and politicization of their sport. Because if I look around, that's something in short supply.
Most of the time I just pretend Mercedes isn't in the race anyway. It's a lot more fun that way. If they are top of the podium I don't care to watch the podium ceremony.
I've never liked Hamilton, because he's always been all about nothing but seeking more attention. I've never felt like he was genuine, but instead would do anything for social media points. I laughed my ass off when the penalties worked so hard against him last week.
Who has from the current grid has resisted it? I haven't followed F1 at all this year so I'm not up on this stuff. Props to them I guess.
Regarding Hamilton - I tried to ignore his antics in the past and just respect him for being a really good driver, but in the past couple years he's just become insufferable. I was sure once all this BLM stuff kicked into high gear he would be all over it.
Charles LeClerc probably the most vocal about it. He defended himself online after being called a racist for not kneeling and said he didn't support the protests having turned violent or that politicians were using the protest for political purposes.
Magnussen said something along the lines of he didn't want to support the BLM political organization. Verstappen I can't remember exactly but I think he at least implied that the kneeling antics were an empty gesture.
This all with Hamilton droning on about how all the other sports are having their unified gestures and whining that F1 isn't following suit. His complaining has not really worked though because a decent amount of the grid doesn't seem all that interested in it. Honestly, I think if Hamilton wasn't in F1 they might not have even done anything at all, he's the one pushing it all.