>:^(
(media.scored.co)
Comments (35)
sorted by:
I never understood why you need 'gender confirmation surgery' if you become a woman if you say you are.
Note the change in terminology: sex change => sex reassignment => gender confirmation.
Leftists are happy to argue this one, actually. They consider sex and gender to be different, so a person's body can be male but their mind can be a woman's. Woman =/= female, man =/= male. Woman is gender, female is sex. Changing the sex to conform with the gender is not a contradiction for leftists, it harmonizes gender and sex.
If sex and gender are different and they were "real women" from the start, how would sexual surgeries "confirm" the gender they wish?
I think all the changes are supposed to make them more passing, so a greater number of outsiders will assume the claimed sex/gender instead of the original, and that's supposed to be better for peace of mind or something (that doesn't end up being true).
I don't think many leftists argue that gender and sex aren't "supposed" to be aligned, after all, they're the only ones promoting surgeries, hormone treatments, etc. I think they generally agree you can be a woman trapped in a man's body, and that treatment can "free" them so they feel more at home in their bodies. That alignment is the "confirmation."
And I agree, it doesn't make sense.
Passing as what, since gender and sex are different things and sex dosen't inform on gender?
Passing as female? But they were never female, and never will be, since you cannot change you sex, which the wokies will concede half the time, deflecting to "sure, but they are women, sex and gender is different".
It's a never ending loop of lying because a woman is an adult human female, which they deny.
Gender is the expression of sex in language.
Like all communists, trans activists corrupt language to support their ideology.
Gender was the polite term for sex until some pedophile in the 70s muddied it up.
"Gender" was coined by pedophiles John Money and Alfred Kinsey in the 1950's.
In that usage. The correct use of the term for classifying nouns in languages like French goes way back. Le formage is masculin. La cigarette is féminin.
Demons casting spells to control the normies.
That’s not entirely inaccurate. Humans have trouble thinking about a concept for which there isn’t a well-defined term. Leftists steal words in order to control how we think.
If there’s no word for the concept: adult human female (because they stole the word “woman” and applied it to a different concept) then you can’t have policies or spaces for adult human females; you can’t distinguish adult human females from adolescent human females for purposes such as consent - it’s a really powerful hex they’ve placed on us.
They do this with a lot of things.
People consider "witchcraft" and "sorcery" to be about casting magic spells in fantasy books....but the leftist manipulation of language is literally that. It's manipulation and it's mind control.
Just like shapeshifters and golems.
If gender is a social construct, and nothing is inherently male or female, then how does putting on a dress or liking sports make you male or female? I can be a man and wear pigtails. I can be a woman and chew tobacco. Since none of it is determined by sex or gender, how could doing them change your sex or gender?
"I'm not doing this"
...walks away
"Sorry xir, but this chopper ride isn't actually optional. Get in."
the answer to that is simple: their definition of man and woman is self-referential. "a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman" etc.
of course, another way to describe a self-referential word is "meaningless".
What does identifying as a woman mean?
see the comment you responded to
That is true, but isn't their entire point about "women with penises" that biological sex doesn't matter?
Also, the 'gender' ideas they have are also pretty contradictory. It's a social construct and it's what's in your head.
"Maybe we should measure people's brains to see if we can confirm whether or not they are telling the truth about having the wrong body."
A few hours later:
"Whoa, members of this racial demographic have a tiny frontal cortex."
Also it used to be diversity => diversity and inclusion -> diversity inclusion and equality -> OH WAIT THAT SPELLS DIE CHANGE IT TO DIVERSITY EQUALITY AND INCLUSION -> well, we don't really want equal opportunity but we want equal outcomes even though per capita we are already overly represented but it's not like we haven't been lying anyway this entire time and it was never about equality so chance it to diversity equity and inclusion
Now they are calling it BRIDGE
saul alinsky intensifies
calling transgenderism irrational is not hyperbole. the tenants of transgenderism contradict themselves, it is quite literally irrational.
Its called being a hypocrite. Same for celebrities who keep saying you have to accept yourself the way you are, but keep doing tons of cosmetic surgeries
Speaking of which, did you see Madonna at the WC? She's had SO MANY surgeries on that face it's unimaginable. She passed Michael Jackson ages ago. She's 'The Argo' now: every part of that boat has been replaced, is she really herself or not? 🤔
"gender affirmation" its "affirming their chosen gender"
amogus in genie's belt in second panel
Trans is a fetish. Nothing more.
The "idea" is that the carpet should match the drapes.
So you "feel like" you're a boy on the inside, but were "wrongly" born with a girl body? This makes you sad. You think you have a penis but there's a vagina. You have boobs but think you shouldn't & etc.
So to be happy you have to take piles of harsh chemicals & painful surgeries.
THEN you're a "happy real boy" even if your DNA says otherwise.
Now even before the "full operation" to chop & fix? You're still a "real boy" but only on the inside, therefor others should all kowtow to your insides or you'll be sad.
Waka Waka