Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

52
This is what Hitler was trying to prevent. Anyone hating him is spiritually complicit. (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 50 days ago by SparkMandrill83 50 days ago by SparkMandrill83 +52 / -0
58 comments download share
58 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (58)
sorted by:
▲ 23 ▼
– Kaarous 23 points 50 days ago +23 / -0

Another reminder, the Soviets raped the people they didn't eat. The commies went on a march of cannibalism, while faking mass graves across the warfront.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 50 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– ScallionPancake 14 points 50 days ago +14 / -0

You might be jewish.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 16 points 50 days ago +16 / -0

Pretty sure he's Indian.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego [M] 21 points 50 days ago +21 / -0

Whatever he is, he's been yeeted. Again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– ScallionPancake 10 points 50 days ago +10 / -0

Jeet, Jew... whats the difference lmao

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 5 points 50 days ago +5 / -0

Jews use toilets and that’s about it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 15 points 50 days ago +15 / -0

So 2 million rapes yields only 37,000 pregnancies, or did they register a bunch of other rape babies but maintain a weirdly specific rejection of certain rape babies? Somebody get the Japanese and the Chinese on the phone, I want to know what the normal rate of conception is during a mass rape event.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Twatwaffle 15 points 50 days ago +15 / -0

They murdered everyone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– LordLavaLamp 18 points 50 days ago +18 / -0

Look, I'm sorry, but this gives me the exact same "prove it, bitch" response as the six gorillion jews they supposedly shoved in the ovens that also left no trace.

Atrocity propaganda is a wartime staple. I want more evidence then a twitter screencap referencing a single book.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 [S] 6 points 50 days ago +6 / -0

Multiple historical sources confirm it. Its not exactly a secret.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LordLavaLamp 6 points 50 days ago +6 / -0

Could you link those then, please?

That's literally all I've asked for.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– horstshort 3 points 49 days ago +3 / -0

You can look up the Wikipedia article and Wikipedia is not exactly known for its pro Nazi Germany bias.

Obviously the claim that they murdered everybody is complete bullshit. Why there were only 37000 registered BIRTHs is very easy to explain.

  1. They raped everybody from prepubescent children to 80 year old grandmas.
  2. A women needs to be ovulating to actually conceive during a rape.
  3. Malnutrition and stress aren't exactly helpful for conceiving a child or carrying it to terms.
  4. And most importantly: Abortions. Lots of abortions.
permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LordLavaLamp 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0

Wikipedia is also not an acceptable primary source.

My goodness, am I showing my age here? I don't trust Wikipedia nearly as far as I could chuck the data centers its hosted from. There's no academic rigor to a platform that anyone can make submissions to, anyone can make edits to, and half the referenced sources go to articles that reference other articles that reference the wikipedia article you came from in the first place.

Do you have, for example, journals, newspaper articles, recorded or written witness testimonies, memoirs, or anything of that like? Or even a good set of secondary sources like books that used these primary sources?

Something that isn't the equivalent of a pile of shoes under a plaque that says "sixty gorillions died here".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– horstshort 2 points 49 days ago +2 / -0

Something that isn't the equivalent of a pile of shoes under a plaque that says "sixty gorillions died here".

Are you serious? First of all asking for witness testimonies while pretending to mock the holocaust is a bit strange.

Second the mass rape by the Red Army not only in Germany but throughout the entirety of Eastern Europe has never been a point of contention. Sure the Soviets downplayed the extent of it just as they pretended that Katyn was done by the Germans while the Allies supported that fairytale until the 50s despite having full knowledge of that event from the very beginning.

Soviet fanboys and Russian nationalists openly boast with it nowadays. Nobody fucking denies it. Nobody. Except maybe Western purple haired communist faggots.

The Wikipedia article is full of the sources you asked for. And in this documentary you have your witness testimonies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPksoZ1e6rw

Also saying

you'd have to have an industrial rape apparatus in place

just shows what game you are actually playing. Truly is a blessing that the downvotes have been disabled for shills like yourself.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 5 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 5 points 50 days ago +5 / -0

The Soviets raped a lot of women, the black and Arab allied forces raped some more, and the rest of the allies not so much.

Western countries had good relations with West Germany immediately after the war. Obviously that doesn't happen if you rape and murder indiscriminately.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– horstshort 4 points 49 days ago +4 / -0

Western countries had good relations with West Germany immediately after the war.

West Germany was (and still is) under military occupation. That's like saying East Germany had good relations with the Soviet Union.

Obviously that doesn't happen if you rape and murder indiscriminately.

And indiscriminately destroy every city, imprison millions under the open sky as 'disarmed combatants' so you can ignore international law about the treatment of prisoners of war, kidnap more for forced labor, commit the greatest intellectual property theft and book burning in human history, forcibly 're-educate' the population and much more.

Of course the occupier is going to have 'good relations' with the government he installed and completely controls.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0

West Germany was (and still is) under military occupation. That's like saying East Germany had good relations with the Soviet Union.

No, on a person to person manner. Talk to a servicemember who is/was stationed in Germany. The Cold War would never have been won if West Germans had substantial resentment towards Americans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– horstshort 2 points 49 days ago +2 / -0

No, on a person to person manner.

Resentment wasn't even allowed. Nobody with half a brain would have openly shown his resentment to the Allied occupiers. The Germans were forcibly re-educated. There was no free press. Literally every newspaper needed to get permission of the intelligence agencies to even operate.

So considering these circumstances and that the Germans were rather glad that the war was over and they weren't bombed every day anymore and they had to deal with a massive influx of refugees and had to rebuild their entire country... yeah they were not showing their resentment for the occupiers because they neither had the time nor even the opportunity for it without getting in a whole lot of trouble.

The Cold War would never have been won if West Germans had substantial resentment towards Americans.

The Cold War was 'won' because the Soviet Union collapsed. West Germany had nothing to do with it. The Stasi even had operatives in the highest echelons of NATO. If it had come to a shooting war it would have become very nasty very quickly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0

Resentment wasn't even allowed. Nobody with half a brain would have openly shown his resentment to the Allied occupiers. The Germans were forcibly re-educated. There was no free press. Literally every newspaper needed to get permission of the intelligence agencies to even operate.

You think speech controls effectively suppress personal resentment? Consult history to see what people act like when they truly don't like their occupiers. Roman-ruled Judea, Ukrainian-ruled Donbass. Even in complete peacetime it's very obvious.

The Cold War was 'won' because the Soviet Union collapsed. West Germany had nothing to do with it. The Stasi even had operatives in the highest echelons of NATO. If it had come to a shooting war it would have become very nasty very quickly.

The fact that people were constantly fleeing into West Germany from communism into capitalism is in fact a massive reason why the Soviet Union collapsed. One side won the economic war, the other one lost.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 5 ▼
– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 5 points 50 days ago +5 / -0

It rings true.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– LordLavaLamp 4 points 50 days ago +4 / -0

What was that bit from...was it Futurama or the Simpsons?

"Your tears say more than any evidence ever could" or something to that effect?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Belenus 7 points 50 days ago +7 / -0

That quote is from The Simpsons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– theaustrianpainter 3 points 50 days ago +3 / -0

Check out what the Americans did in the Pacific Islands on their way to Japan. Rape is part of war, as is eating and sleeping.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 9 points 50 days ago +9 / -0

Like the time a bunch of black GIs ran a rape train on an Okinawan town until the locals buried them in a cave?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– LordLavaLamp 5 points 50 days ago +5 / -0

Oh, certainly. I'm familiar with the rape of Nanking, among other similar events. I'm not denying that rapes most certainly happened.

My issue is more with the purported scale of it. For a million plus rapes after the war, you'd have to have an industrial rape apparatus in place at a time when the allies were pulling out of germany. I'd need to see more evidence before I could accept the claim.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 4 points 50 days ago +4 / -0

That'd do it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– dzonatan 3 points 50 days ago +3 / -0
  1. Women need to be on their period first before they get pregnant. Let's be generous and assume half of them didn't had it during their turn. That already eliminates 1 million possible pregnancies.

  2. Now let's assume half of them refused even if it means death like OP picture. That eliminates another 500k possible pregnancies.

  3. Now let's assume the remaining 500k had an abortion. 1927 court decision allowed women to have an abortion in case of grave danger to the mother. That is if we can even assume something like upholding law in a country that has been ravaged by war. That's 250k aborted, legally/safely or not.

  4. Now let's assume that out of 250k babies that were born survived into adulthood. It's reasonable to assume that they did not because rapey soldiers wouldn't bother to stick around to provide for their rape child. That's 125k babies that died from malnutrition or abandonment, if not more.

  5. Now let's assume that out of 125k that somehow managed to make it through it all and decided to remain in a devastated country. Sensible to assume that they would not because their homeland was a wreck and they had no healthy family ties that would bind them. Let's cut it down by another half and that remains another 62.5k.

  6. 37k registered bastards sounds reasonable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 8 points 50 days ago +8 / -0

Bro uteri don't work like that. The period is when they stop being fertile, it's the time before it you're thinking of.

In any case, you were right that fertility is a limited window and there were a lot of murders. Additionally, postwar poverty is a terrible environment to try to bring a pregnancy to term in. And I'm sure there were a lot of half Slavic kids passed off as completely German.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 4 points 50 days ago +4 / -0

Women need to be on their period first before they get pregnant. Let's be generous and assume half of them didn't had it during their turn. That already eliminates 1 million possible pregnancies.

Now let's assume half of them refused even if it means death like OP picture. That eliminates another 500k possible pregnancies.

Now let's assume the remaining 500k had an abortion. 1927 court decision allowed women to have an abortion in case of grave danger to the mother. That is if we can even assume something like upholding law in a country that has been ravaged by war. That's 250k aborted, legally/safely or not.

No, no, and no

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MattTheBlack 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0

Low. Rape rarely results in pregnancy because conception requires women to not be stressed and well rape is stressful

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Erase99 15 points 50 days ago +15 / -0

Most of human history will be overturned on Judgement Day.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 [S] 2 points 50 days ago +2 / -0

Most humans should be as well.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Megaboom2025 5 points 50 days ago +5 / -0

We pray for his return every day

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ready_gamer_two 4 points 50 days ago +4 / -0

LMAO the state of that sub. It's now just either p*do spammers or stormfags.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Impishdesire 13 points 50 days ago +13 / -0

it’s hard not to be a stormfag just based on fashion. It’s also becoming impossible to not notice anymore. It was always obvious but there was a social stigma to naming them thats pretty much gone now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– StaticNoise2 2 points 50 days ago +2 / -0

No people just had critical thinking and didn't fall for circular "the patriarchy but it's the Jews instead"

Saying "the only difference is there's no stigma against naming it" is what a feminist would say about the "patriarchy". "Every woman instinctively knew there was a patriarchy, now there's just not a stigma against it".

It's a self fulfilling circular ideology, just like feminism is.

Any worldview except Christianity that tries to have explanatory power for EVERYTHING should be rejected as bollocks.

Why does Christianity get the exception? Because objective truth means there can be a billion lies but only one truth on any given thing. Christianity, the Bible, the Holy Spirit, Jesus are the only things that are capital T truth and establish the boundaries of everything else you have an observance of.

For instance starting with the Bible first, we can know one narrative point that is able to be rejected. That the Jews are the category of most evil people. The Bible singles out a category of people who are the most uniquely evil in either 1st or 2nd Peter. That is false prophets, aka people who knowingly introduce error in scripture, not merely being deceived but rather sending people to hell for the sake of earthly pleasures. The Bible says they will occupy the same level of hell as the demons, the Greek word Tartarus is used.

While a Rabbi could be a deliberate false prophet leading people to hell, with possibility that some are unknowingly doing so being deceiveed themselves, his evilness is not due to Jewishess but is of the same spirit of evil as Kenneth Copeland. Kenneth Copeland and a Rabbi who knows what he's doing and isn't merely deceived are in this uniquely evil category the Bible lays out. Same with the Chinese "pastors" who enjoy the protection and benefits of the Chinese government by preaching from the altered Chinese CCP approved Bible.

So people who say "Jews are the most evil category of people" aren't operating from a Bible first position. The Bible tells us false prophets are the most evil and when it says false prophet, it means specifically those coming into Christianity introducing heresy for worldly gain. By sheer population amounts Jews don't make up a majority of this category. For instance in Africa they have a serious epidemic of prosperity gospel type preachers like Kenneth Copeland. It's a category of person that is utterly detached from any ethnicity.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Impishdesire 16 points 50 days ago +16 / -0

Bla bla bla whatever moron. Jews are currently blackmailing our president to blow up a middle eastern country, Jews own Hollywood and poisoned our culture with it, Jews push for flooding Europe with non-whites, Jews own the banking system and can debank people. However it’s not the Jews!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– DrySharkPussy 11 points 50 days ago +11 / -0

tldr, ur gay

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SendTomBoys 6 points 50 days ago +6 / -0

Tldr you're a Jew loving faggot goy cow

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CatoTheElder 1 point 50 days ago +1 / -0

Well we know that Christians are categorically liars, since they claim that God is good and just. That is obliviously false since he made this shithole of a world.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– StaticNoise2 5 points 50 days ago +5 / -0

No, he made a perfect world. Man rebelled and with sin came death and the curse. Hence the New Heavens and the New Earth where sin and all pain, sadness, will be forever defeated and "the former things will be remembered no more", cast into hell which is why you need to repent and believe in Jesus. Because this world as screwed up as it is, you've never experienced a world where none of Gods glory is. To the degree you can feel the warmth of the sun on your skin, enjoy tasty food, smell a pleasant smelling flower, you are experiencing the grace and majesty of God. If you think earth is a crap hole what do you think hell, where none of the good things are and where all sin that is the source of your frustration is sent to be punished for eternity?

Rejecting Jesus because you hate the evil in the world is like hating the doctor who's offering you a cure for your terminal illness and blaming the doctor for giving you the illness.

The curse on this world that God implemented when Adam and Eve sinned where God made work hard, giving birth painful and allows evil to exist is so that people know something is wrong and seek the One who can make it right. Holiness and sin can't exist together. If not for Jesus sacrifice for forgiveness of our sins, the human race would have been obliterated as soon as sin entered the world. That we have existed to the year 2026 in order to complain about the world is evidence of God's mercy and long-suffering nature wishing all would repent, not evidence that He made a flawed world. Sin brought death, sin continues to make the world hellish and God also cursed the world making it not at all like the paradise that Adam and Eve temporarily experienced.

But this life is like a vapor a puff of smoke. Paul says for those who believe, the pains of this time aren't worth comparing to the glory that is to come.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 50 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent [M] 2 points 49 days ago +2 / -0

"Kill all people who worship the god of Abraham" is not allowed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 50 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– dzonatan 4 points 50 days ago +4 / -0

Winners write history and they sure as hell don't write themselves as villians.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– realsolidsnakeoil 3 points 50 days ago +3 / -0

Thats a retarded argument. Obviously this the very first account of war rape in human history and has never, ever happened before or since.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Quebec_Is_A_ShitHole 2 points 50 days ago +2 / -0

The women who stayed in Berlin - wtf were they thinking?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– ScallionPancake 12 points 50 days ago +12 / -0

Where would they go?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 [S] 7 points 50 days ago +7 / -0

Women were raped all across Europe, even in allied countries

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Quebec_Is_A_ShitHole 2 points 50 days ago +2 / -0

Tbf isnt that what women are designed for anyway?

When a male wolf sees a female world, does he asks himself "man does this female wolf want it"? Ofc not... Nature is nature...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 50 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– MattTheBlack 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0

Hitler was a faggot pagan that allied with muslims. No amount of revisionist history will change that. The jews sucking doesn't make him a hero. We should have nuked the Soviets though

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 50 days ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy