Wikipedia is also not an acceptable primary source.
My goodness, am I showing my age here? I don't trust Wikipedia nearly as far as I could chuck the data centers its hosted from. There's no academic rigor to a platform that anyone can make submissions to, anyone can make edits to, and half the referenced sources go to articles that reference other articles that reference the wikipedia article you came from in the first place.
Do you have, for example, journals, newspaper articles, recorded or written witness testimonies, memoirs, or anything of that like? Or even a good set of secondary sources like books that used these primary sources?
Something that isn't the equivalent of a pile of shoes under a plaque that says "sixty gorillions died here".
Something that isn't the equivalent of a pile of shoes under a plaque that says "sixty gorillions died here".
Are you serious? First of all asking for witness testimonies while pretending to mock the holocaust is a bit strange.
Second the mass rape by the Red Army not only in Germany but throughout the entirety of Eastern Europe has never been a point of contention. Sure the Soviets downplayed the extent of it just as they pretended that Katyn was done by the Germans while the Allies supported that fairytale until the 50s despite having full knowledge of that event from the very beginning.
Soviet fanboys and Russian nationalists openly boast with it nowadays. Nobody fucking denies it. Nobody. Except maybe Western purple haired communist faggots.
The Wikipedia article is full of the sources you asked for. And in this documentary you have your witness testimonies.
Multiple historical sources confirm it. Its not exactly a secret.
Could you link those then, please?
That's literally all I've asked for.
You can look up the Wikipedia article and Wikipedia is not exactly known for its pro Nazi Germany bias.
Obviously the claim that they murdered everybody is complete bullshit. Why there were only 37000 registered BIRTHs is very easy to explain.
Wikipedia is also not an acceptable primary source.
My goodness, am I showing my age here? I don't trust Wikipedia nearly as far as I could chuck the data centers its hosted from. There's no academic rigor to a platform that anyone can make submissions to, anyone can make edits to, and half the referenced sources go to articles that reference other articles that reference the wikipedia article you came from in the first place.
Do you have, for example, journals, newspaper articles, recorded or written witness testimonies, memoirs, or anything of that like? Or even a good set of secondary sources like books that used these primary sources?
Something that isn't the equivalent of a pile of shoes under a plaque that says "sixty gorillions died here".
Are you serious? First of all asking for witness testimonies while pretending to mock the holocaust is a bit strange.
Second the mass rape by the Red Army not only in Germany but throughout the entirety of Eastern Europe has never been a point of contention. Sure the Soviets downplayed the extent of it just as they pretended that Katyn was done by the Germans while the Allies supported that fairytale until the 50s despite having full knowledge of that event from the very beginning.
Soviet fanboys and Russian nationalists openly boast with it nowadays. Nobody fucking denies it. Nobody. Except maybe Western purple haired communist faggots.
The Wikipedia article is full of the sources you asked for. And in this documentary you have your witness testimonies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPksoZ1e6rw
Also saying
just shows what game you are actually playing. Truly is a blessing that the downvotes have been disabled for shills like yourself.