The problem I see here is using AI to depict a real person doing and saying things that they did not do or say. There will be a legal blow up over this at some point, I don't know if it'll be this ad but it'll be something like it.
In Quebec, a news organisation was blamed for showing a fictional representation of money given and a handshake to illustrate an accusation against a political figure.
It was obviously misleading people by ''showing it happening''.
Now this AI video is a political campaing add, not a journalist investigation. But I still think it wouldn't fly in court.
It's incredible how the quality of this AI slop is almost indistinguishable from a guy who's username is DonPBongwater and shitposts about YouTube drama.
I don’t see how that statistic about legalizing prostitution could possibly be true. LEGALIZING it causes an exponential 70% increase in trafficking? I’ve been on the side of logic that it actually SHOULD be legalized and regulated. If two people wanna exchange $200 and jump each other that’s not my business, but now I’m kinda backtracking on that if this data is accurate
Because that is NOT how prostitution works in practice. Ever heard of a pimp?
Legal or otherwise it incentivizes organised crime, and the women end up either literal or practical slaves. A "legal" prostitution ring is also the best possible cover for trafficking underage and eventually children.
Legal or otherwise it incentivizes organised crime
Ever heard of a pimp?
That's a shitty argument that can be used for anything:
"Allowing people to own cars leads to theft rings, carjacking, chop shops, and organized crime."
"Allowing people to carry cash leads to organized rings of pick pockets."
Everything where money or property is exchanged creates a profit motive for crimes.
There are jurisdictions where they've legalized prostitution but pimping is still a crime. On paper, that leaves more resources to go after the organized, criminal part. And the victims can report it without fear of charges of their own.
Everything where money or property is exchanged creates a profit motive for crimes.
Only one form of legalisation has been proven to increase the amount of child trafficking. But if factual data is a shitty argument to you, you do you.
Technically, yes, but you could define literally every increase as exponential if you view it that way, hence the term losing its meaning. In popular vernacular it used to mean a ten-fold or more increase.
While I can't say it is true, I can see how it could be true: it's easier to hide illegal prostitution in a pile of legal prostitution than it is on its own.
It's a bit weird that Jews are still harping on this guy after he bent the knee. I guess the checks have already been cashed so the work needs to be done.
Political theatre….i hate this WWF system we live under and how they pretend it matters who you vote for when both candidates will end up being good for j’ws. Nobody finds it strange that Zohar represents everything j’ws love aside from his stance on Israel/palestine. Obviously J’ws know the genocide they’re committing can’t be hidden, which is causing leftists to go against all Israel loving candidates, so the j’ws provide a candidate to the left who pretends to be against Israel but will promote everything else J’ws love, social program growth, he’ll destroy small businesses, he’ll promote White discrimination policy, he’ll ensure the jewdicial system releases the maximum number of violent browns and throws the book at all White offenders, he’ll be authoritarian if the J’ws call for it, and he will take the heat off of J’ws while it happens because he’s their alleged enemy, also, republicans in NY can blame all of their problems on the dang moozlim commies…..and all J’ws have gotta do to get leftists on board is to pretend their puppet is against israel, which won’t be very believable once he takes office, but that doesn’t matter because leftists finally get the brown commie they’ve always wanted. He’s the left wing Trump, and leftists are eating it up.
"I can't believe this far-right propaganda is abusing AI to push it's hateful and bigoted-"
Sir, this was posted by the previous Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo
"NANI??"
If this is real then it’s the funniest thing a Democrat has ever posted.
Kinda amusing, but a lot more nauseating for me. Everything in there is accurate, but the bit that's not said:
Cuomo was governor of NY for a decade, and spent that time actually doing everything in the ad, and much, much worse.
Nuke them all from orbit, then drop a couple more orbital nukes for good measure. And I still wouldn't be sure.
The problem I see here is using AI to depict a real person doing and saying things that they did not do or say. There will be a legal blow up over this at some point, I don't know if it'll be this ad but it'll be something like it.
In Quebec, a news organisation was blamed for showing a fictional representation of money given and a handshake to illustrate an accusation against a political figure.
It was obviously misleading people by ''showing it happening''.
Now this AI video is a political campaing add, not a journalist investigation. But I still think it wouldn't fly in court.
It's incredible how the quality of this AI slop is almost indistinguishable from a guy who's username is DonPBongwater and shitposts about YouTube drama.
Truly the AI utopia is here. 🙄
I don’t see how that statistic about legalizing prostitution could possibly be true. LEGALIZING it causes an exponential 70% increase in trafficking? I’ve been on the side of logic that it actually SHOULD be legalized and regulated. If two people wanna exchange $200 and jump each other that’s not my business, but now I’m kinda backtracking on that if this data is accurate
Because that is NOT how prostitution works in practice. Ever heard of a pimp?
Legal or otherwise it incentivizes organised crime, and the women end up either literal or practical slaves. A "legal" prostitution ring is also the best possible cover for trafficking underage and eventually children.
It would need to be regulated the hell out of, and the regulators would need to, in turn, also be regulated because of bribery or oversight concerns.
A bureaucrat's wet dream, when it comes to prostitutes, really. Three to four layers of red tape and forms behind every interaction.
That's a shitty argument that can be used for anything:
"Allowing people to own cars leads to theft rings, carjacking, chop shops, and organized crime."
"Allowing people to carry cash leads to organized rings of pick pockets."
Everything where money or property is exchanged creates a profit motive for crimes.
There are jurisdictions where they've legalized prostitution but pimping is still a crime. On paper, that leaves more resources to go after the organized, criminal part. And the victims can report it without fear of charges of their own.
Only one form of legalisation has been proven to increase the amount of child trafficking. But if factual data is a shitty argument to you, you do you.
Bring back the word exponential actually having a meaning.
x^0.1 is technically an exponential increase...
Technically, yes, but you could define literally every increase as exponential if you view it that way, hence the term losing its meaning. In popular vernacular it used to mean a ten-fold or more increase.
See now, if you use exponential the other way it's a way of saying the increase is consistent with even higher values of x.
So they're just saying that if you were to make prostitution double plus legal trafficking would actually go up 189%
Well no, it'd be an exponential decrease in that case. But I get what you're going for.
And yes, you’re retarded because legalizing it will industrialize it to scale and then enshrine it politically as an unalienable right.
This has happened to every other Vice that has been legalized.
Iirc, holland has legalised prostitution but still has lots of trafficked humans
While I can't say it is true, I can see how it could be true: it's easier to hide illegal prostitution in a pile of legal prostitution than it is on its own.
This was amazing & I can’t believe this was made by a Democrat.
I think they had to hire outside of their normal cool of 'creatives' for this one ;)
It's the same as Newsom hiring someone to talk like Donald trump on X, except the output of the guy who made this is marginally less cringe.
Surprising to see AI storebrand Idris Elba cast as the pharmacy shoplifter.
Despite being statistically true by probability, it would never be depicted as such in any other sort of MSM.
Entire ads are AI now huh
It's a bit weird that Jews are still harping on this guy after he bent the knee. I guess the checks have already been cashed so the work needs to be done.
Zohar Momdonny….what a shit show no matter who NYS has
Political theatre….i hate this WWF system we live under and how they pretend it matters who you vote for when both candidates will end up being good for j’ws. Nobody finds it strange that Zohar represents everything j’ws love aside from his stance on Israel/palestine. Obviously J’ws know the genocide they’re committing can’t be hidden, which is causing leftists to go against all Israel loving candidates, so the j’ws provide a candidate to the left who pretends to be against Israel but will promote everything else J’ws love, social program growth, he’ll destroy small businesses, he’ll promote White discrimination policy, he’ll ensure the jewdicial system releases the maximum number of violent browns and throws the book at all White offenders, he’ll be authoritarian if the J’ws call for it, and he will take the heat off of J’ws while it happens because he’s their alleged enemy, also, republicans in NY can blame all of their problems on the dang moozlim commies…..and all J’ws have gotta do to get leftists on board is to pretend their puppet is against israel, which won’t be very believable once he takes office, but that doesn’t matter because leftists finally get the brown commie they’ve always wanted. He’s the left wing Trump, and leftists are eating it up.
As mayor of NYC, that might be close to the first time doing that would actually be democracy working right for the demographics.