Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

67
Let's take a look at Cuomos latest ad (twitter.com)
posted 242 days ago by evilplushie 242 days ago by evilplushie +67 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 29 ▼
– 1776ReasonsWhy 29 points 242 days ago +29 / -0

"I can't believe this far-right propaganda is abusing AI to push it's hateful and bigoted-"

Sir, this was posted by the previous Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo

"NANI??"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 26 points 242 days ago +26 / -0

If this is real then it’s the funniest thing a Democrat has ever posted.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– ailurus 25 points 242 days ago +25 / -0

Kinda amusing, but a lot more nauseating for me. Everything in there is accurate, but the bit that's not said:

Cuomo was governor of NY for a decade, and spent that time actually doing everything in the ad, and much, much worse.

Nuke them all from orbit, then drop a couple more orbital nukes for good measure. And I still wouldn't be sure.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 13 points 242 days ago +13 / -0

The problem I see here is using AI to depict a real person doing and saying things that they did not do or say. There will be a legal blow up over this at some point, I don't know if it'll be this ad but it'll be something like it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– RoulerBleu 6 points 242 days ago +6 / -0

In Quebec, a news organisation was blamed for showing a fictional representation of money given and a handshake to illustrate an accusation against a political figure.

It was obviously misleading people by ''showing it happening''.

Now this AI video is a political campaing add, not a journalist investigation. But I still think it wouldn't fly in court.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– BandageBandolier 10 points 242 days ago +10 / -0

It's incredible how the quality of this AI slop is almost indistinguishable from a guy who's username is DonPBongwater and shitposts about YouTube drama.

Truly the AI utopia is here. 🙄

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AgilePickle1123 5 points 242 days ago +5 / -0

I don’t see how that statistic about legalizing prostitution could possibly be true. LEGALIZING it causes an exponential 70% increase in trafficking? I’ve been on the side of logic that it actually SHOULD be legalized and regulated. If two people wanna exchange $200 and jump each other that’s not my business, but now I’m kinda backtracking on that if this data is accurate

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Isolated_Patriot 17 points 242 days ago +17 / -0

If two people wanna exchange

Because that is NOT how prostitution works in practice. Ever heard of a pimp?

Legal or otherwise it incentivizes organised crime, and the women end up either literal or practical slaves. A "legal" prostitution ring is also the best possible cover for trafficking underage and eventually children.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 7 points 242 days ago +7 / -0

It would need to be regulated the hell out of, and the regulators would need to, in turn, also be regulated because of bribery or oversight concerns.

A bureaucrat's wet dream, when it comes to prostitutes, really. Three to four layers of red tape and forms behind every interaction.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ernsithe 2 points 241 days ago +2 / -0

Legal or otherwise it incentivizes organised crime
Ever heard of a pimp?

That's a shitty argument that can be used for anything:
"Allowing people to own cars leads to theft rings, carjacking, chop shops, and organized crime."
"Allowing people to carry cash leads to organized rings of pick pockets."

Everything where money or property is exchanged creates a profit motive for crimes.

There are jurisdictions where they've legalized prostitution but pimping is still a crime. On paper, that leaves more resources to go after the organized, criminal part. And the victims can report it without fear of charges of their own.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Isolated_Patriot 1 point 241 days ago +1 / -0

Everything where money or property is exchanged creates a profit motive for crimes.

Only one form of legalisation has been proven to increase the amount of child trafficking. But if factual data is a shitty argument to you, you do you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– daberoniandcheese 16 points 242 days ago +16 / -0

exponential 70% increase

Bring back the word exponential actually having a meaning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 5 points 242 days ago +5 / -0

x^0.1 is technically an exponential increase...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– daberoniandcheese 3 points 242 days ago +3 / -0

Technically, yes, but you could define literally every increase as exponential if you view it that way, hence the term losing its meaning. In popular vernacular it used to mean a ten-fold or more increase.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BandageBandolier 1 point 241 days ago +1 / -0

See now, if you use exponential the other way it's a way of saying the increase is consistent with even higher values of x.

So they're just saying that if you were to make prostitution double plus legal trafficking would actually go up 189%

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WhoIsThatMaskedMan 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

Well no, it'd be an exponential decrease in that case. But I get what you're going for.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– covok48 10 points 242 days ago +10 / -0

And yes, you’re retarded because legalizing it will industrialize it to scale and then enshrine it politically as an unalienable right.

This has happened to every other Vice that has been legalized.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 7 points 242 days ago +7 / -0

Iirc, holland has legalised prostitution but still has lots of trafficked humans

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Grumman 3 points 242 days ago +3 / -0

While I can't say it is true, I can see how it could be true: it's easier to hide illegal prostitution in a pile of legal prostitution than it is on its own.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 2 more comments
▲ 4 ▼
– covok48 4 points 242 days ago +4 / -0

This was amazing & I can’t believe this was made by a Democrat.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– m0r1arty 6 points 242 days ago +6 / -0

I think they had to hire outside of their normal cool of 'creatives' for this one ;)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BandageBandolier 2 points 241 days ago +2 / -0

It's the same as Newsom hiring someone to talk like Donald trump on X, except the output of the guy who made this is marginally less cringe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

Surprising to see AI storebrand Idris Elba cast as the pharmacy shoplifter.

Despite being statistically true by probability, it would never be depicted as such in any other sort of MSM.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Handshook 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

Entire ads are AI now huh

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

It's a bit weird that Jews are still harping on this guy after he bent the knee. I guess the checks have already been cashed so the work needs to be done.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MartinRigggs 1 point 242 days ago +1 / -0

Zohar Momdonny….what a shit show no matter who NYS has

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MartinRigggs 1 point 242 days ago +1 / -0

Political theatre….i hate this WWF system we live under and how they pretend it matters who you vote for when both candidates will end up being good for j’ws. Nobody finds it strange that Zohar represents everything j’ws love aside from his stance on Israel/palestine. Obviously J’ws know the genocide they’re committing can’t be hidden, which is causing leftists to go against all Israel loving candidates, so the j’ws provide a candidate to the left who pretends to be against Israel but will promote everything else J’ws love, social program growth, he’ll destroy small businesses, he’ll promote White discrimination policy, he’ll ensure the jewdicial system releases the maximum number of violent browns and throws the book at all White offenders, he’ll be authoritarian if the J’ws call for it, and he will take the heat off of J’ws while it happens because he’s their alleged enemy, also, republicans in NY can blame all of their problems on the dang moozlim commies…..and all J’ws have gotta do to get leftists on board is to pretend their puppet is against israel, which won’t be very believable once he takes office, but that doesn’t matter because leftists finally get the brown commie they’ve always wanted. He’s the left wing Trump, and leftists are eating it up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BandageBandolier 1 point 241 days ago +1 / -0

pretend it matters who you vote for when both candidates will end up being good for j’ws.

As mayor of NYC, that might be close to the first time doing that would actually be democracy working right for the demographics.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy