The Left is inherently violent
(twitter.com)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Intersectional social justice is nothing more than a lynch mob that is somehow semiprotected by authorities at the moment.
There is nothing noble, compassionate or sympathetic to anyone in their collective doings apart from personal gain. They'd drop each other faster than an accepted pronoun if it brought their future into danger.
As an abstract I'm not against some creative civil disobedience for a greater good for all. But they don't want it in Martha's Vineyard and so why should anyone else put up with it?
We all know how. They have the correct targets for those in charge.
Look back at the 1960s and 70s. Leftists bombed (among many, many other targets) the US Capitol and made the exact same "white people bad" proclamations that they do now. With the Capitol bombing specifically nobody was ever arrested. People in the organization were allowed to just keep doing exactly what they were doing and get normal jobs and a bunch of them ended up as college professors. Barack Obama's political career started in Bill Ayers's living room.
they cannot be allowed to hide in the shadows this time
That's from the past 10 years.
Try the past 140.
Leftist violence is even worse, far more broad, and absolutely continuous.
Try the past [human history.]
It wasn't always called leftism, but as long as there was that set of ideas, they justified violence against their perceived opposition.
They're on the Right Side of History™, they can do whatever they like to us subhumans.
I think that's too broad.
Ideology isn't super common prior to the enlightenment (contrasted with Religion, sect, and cult). It's a bit different.
Religions tend to circle around something specific. Leftism is the idea set behind seizing power through resentment.
Yes, we can see that specific pattern replicated elsewhere, but it wasn't a large-scale belief system that people were required to adhere to at all levels.
Well, like I said, as long as there was that set of ideas. So if you're saying the enlightenment, let's go from there. Point is, leftists have always been violent terrorists.
Can't disagree with any of that.
Leftism is the political and cultural manifestation human evil. It didn’t start with muh Marxism.
Yes, it started with Rousseau and the Jacobins in France.
But it isn't just a manifestation of evil, it's a warped perspective on humans that inevitably generates evil.
You can go back to the Roman populares, where politicians bribed poor urban citizens with bread and circuses. Leftism is a recurring phenomenon, not a modern proper noun.
If that's what you want to talk about, don't call it Leftism, because Leftism is explicitly French. Parisian to be exact.
Yeah, most people don't know about the socialist and anarchist terrorist bombings that were going on back then. For some reason, government schools aren't interested in covering that, aside from maybe claiming Sacco and Vanzetti were wrongfully convicted.
Of all the major terrorist attacks or offensives in history, here's the ones nobody talks about, and were all Leftwing:
And just to be clear only The Wallstreet Bombing is even referred to as a Leftist Terrorist attack on Wikipedia.
Of course they are.
Their core principle is "anyone with more stuff than me, must have obtained by wronging me somehow."
Also Canadian church burnings just because they FEEL there are bodies under them
And in almost all of these the media ran defense. The government and the media continue to enable these people
John Cleese covered this about 4 decades ago on TV.
Pardon the low res. Everything was low res back then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4
Man, I remember when they finally invented color! *yells at cloud*
Kirk has been an interesting bellweather. So many lefties have just nonchalantly clued in the normiecons that they don't share anything close to the same values.
You'd think the BLM riots would do it but boomers were like "oh racism is bad they have a point", you'd think the Jan 6 farce would cause it but they're like "Oh they rioted at the capital that is a crime." So for the left why not kill a moderate conservative and dance on his grave? Objectively speaking they've already done far worse to the right, why would this event set people off?
Very sad for Charlie but as a martyr maybe some people are actually connecting the dots.
The millions of leftists who think Shiloh Hendrix should die for using the N word against a thief too. For a word against a thief. Think about that, for a moment.
Communism is left wing. Stalin did more violence in an average day than all of these combined.
Leftists get violent when they don't get their way.
And the legacy media has defended all of it.
International Socialism, National Socialism, it's not the ideology that's different, just the scope and scale. The ideology is the second word, the target market is all the first word is.