I'm kind of curious what their narrative is going to be. Probably that Musk leaked info about epstein because he's mad Trump won't let him be co-president any more.
I wonder if that is legit. But I hate they are fighting because now Elon will be a hero since anyone who is critical of Trump gets the red carpet treatment. Heck, is the White House janitor had something negative to say about Trump, MSNBC would have them on to discuss it
All that anyone's seen is that Trump was given the opportunity to take one of Epstien's secondary private planes back to New York from a trip. Not the Lolita Express (which Clinton traveled on literally dozens of times). He's also basically one of the only known celebrities to have co-operated with the investigation.
I think there's a certain level of fake to it. They both needed each other for a specific task, and now it's over. It's not supposed to be a perfect group that gets along, but people who happened to have a similar need for a specific thing.
Sort of like how Trump is dealing with the middle east. He doesn't agree with them, but wants to do business. Same with Musk, he did the research and presented it. What happens now is negotiation.
Musk has clients that don't like Trump, and vice versa. So, end the partnership when the project is done.
As inconsistent as it is, it seems to be some form of realism. If something isn't working... stop.
Hell, nobody claimed Trump would start stepping away from Israel and Netanyahu, but it became necessary and it won him friends in the Arab world.
I don't have an answer to what will or will not work out because the whole administration seems to be playing everything by ear, for better or for worse.
Yeah, I wonder how much is kayfabe, or why that would be needed.
I know why the media and lefties want the feud, but I doubt they're not thinking very far past it. It could simply be helping Elon get out of all the political stuff so he can do what he actually enjoys. It could also show where Trump places his limits and see if people realize that.
Gonna be retarded here, so I apologize 😔. So the time/date at the bottom of a Tweet isn't Actually the time it was tweeted, but a time someone else viewed it?
Why not? That's exactly what he did it with the Thailand diver and he won the defamation lawsuit because "oh my brother working as a P.I. told me that but it turned out he's a drunk and was wrong sorry." Elon literally lied to ruin a working man's reputation (you still find people saying "well he was probably a pedo") and got away with it.
Don't we already have a shit ton of confirmation Trump was on the plane and partying with him off and on for a long time? Of course he'd be in the files, that's something that absolutely needs to be investigated regardless of guilty findings.
Him simply being in the file is useless information unless it confirms something we don't know yet, because we already have the connection as known information and there hasn't been a fire yet from the large amount of smoke. And if there was any chance of it, they'd have found the girl and made her a "hero" already to take him down.
The fact that he was both on a few flight logs, though not to the island itself, and had him at MarALago enough to both ban him and give up information during an investigation says otherwise.
That's all neutral information, that just means he existed in the same circles of rich dudes in Florida/NYC, but its enough to justify investigating to clear him like all police investigations do. And that would leave a paper trail regardless of its findings.
So he didn't ban him or initiate cooperation with helping during the older investigation? The very information that mostly absolves him of any real suspicion to begin with? I'm fairly certain he himself admits to those two facts, though finding anything on the topic is impossible anymore.
I'll hear confirmation to the contrary, if you have it though. So far its just been "you're retarded (for saying he is innocent until proven guilty)" which makes me feel you don't have any.
I feel like this is a phrasing issue here. Context and phrasing made it sound like you were suspecting criminal conduct because he banned him and supported the investigation. Reading it again I can see how it can come off as you were intending, but I feel less retarded because it seems others also read it that way.
The phrasing is necessary because it meets the two points of "he is on the list" and "why is he on the list" that makes Musk's accusation useless information, which was designed to maximizing manipulation in simply associating his name with it in defiance of information we have confirmation of.
Logically, I don't see how supporting the investigation could indict Trump of criminal conduct short of some 7D chess move, which should have indicated that you weren't reading my point correctly. But I'm just as guilty of that mistake, so no hard feelings my guy.
At least lefties can't say Elon is the real president anymore.
I'm kind of curious what their narrative is going to be. Probably that Musk leaked info about epstein because he's mad Trump won't let him be co-president any more.
I wonder if that is legit. But I hate they are fighting because now Elon will be a hero since anyone who is critical of Trump gets the red carpet treatment. Heck, is the White House janitor had something negative to say about Trump, MSNBC would have them on to discuss it
Elon has burned too many bridges, only jeets like him now
All that anyone's seen is that Trump was given the opportunity to take one of Epstien's secondary private planes back to New York from a trip. Not the Lolita Express (which Clinton traveled on literally dozens of times). He's also basically one of the only known celebrities to have co-operated with the investigation.
True. And I feel Dems would’ve been all over it if they had that info
I think there's a certain level of fake to it. They both needed each other for a specific task, and now it's over. It's not supposed to be a perfect group that gets along, but people who happened to have a similar need for a specific thing.
Sort of like how Trump is dealing with the middle east. He doesn't agree with them, but wants to do business. Same with Musk, he did the research and presented it. What happens now is negotiation.
Musk has clients that don't like Trump, and vice versa. So, end the partnership when the project is done.
As inconsistent as it is, it seems to be some form of realism. If something isn't working... stop.
Hell, nobody claimed Trump would start stepping away from Israel and Netanyahu, but it became necessary and it won him friends in the Arab world.
I don't have an answer to what will or will not work out because the whole administration seems to be playing everything by ear, for better or for worse.
Pretty much. Whatever is going on isn't the Kayfab we're used to, but probably not the fight we think it is.
Hopefully nobody here falls for the "they're just putting on a show" cope after this. You don't just casually accuse somebody of raping kids.
Well Elon does, all the time. Member his submarine trip?
There are some key differences between a British expat living in Thailand and Donald Trump that you may be overlooking.
Feuds are a common part of kayfabe storylines.
Yeah, I wonder how much is kayfabe, or why that would be needed.
I know why the media and lefties want the feud, but I doubt they're not thinking very far past it. It could simply be helping Elon get out of all the political stuff so he can do what he actually enjoys. It could also show where Trump places his limits and see if people realize that.
I guess we'll see.
Wait, that says June 5th at 8:10pm. Is he In the Country? It Can't be 8pm anywhere yet. I'm Central Time and its 3:45 pm
4:45 Eastern 2:45 Mountain 1:45 Pacific
EDIT- I see at Newer Post has a time stamp of 12:30pm. Hmm. Whole thing is weird
The time is from whoever is viewing the tweet, so it was probably somebody in Europe who screenshotted it.
Gonna be retarded here, so I apologize 😔. So the time/date at the bottom of a Tweet isn't Actually the time it was tweeted, but a time someone else viewed it?
I dont have "X" so I truly dont know 💁🏼♀️
Thank you for coming to Nothingburger, home of the Nothingburger. Can I take your order? One Nothingburger, coming up.
Why not? That's exactly what he did it with the Thailand diver and he won the defamation lawsuit because "oh my brother working as a P.I. told me that but it turned out he's a drunk and was wrong sorry." Elon literally lied to ruin a working man's reputation (you still find people saying "well he was probably a pedo") and got away with it.
If it's true no defimation lawsuit if it's not the list comes out in discovery?
It's a feint.
Briar-patching.
He's driving up demand for release of the Epstein Files.
Trump never set foot on Epstein's island.
I'm no Elon Fan but I wouldn't be so quick to vindicate Trump
Don't we already have a shit ton of confirmation Trump was on the plane and partying with him off and on for a long time? Of course he'd be in the files, that's something that absolutely needs to be investigated regardless of guilty findings.
Him simply being in the file is useless information unless it confirms something we don't know yet, because we already have the connection as known information and there hasn't been a fire yet from the large amount of smoke. And if there was any chance of it, they'd have found the girl and made her a "hero" already to take him down.
No, we never did because he wasn't, but it's something that very loud and nasty retards have been screaming about for almost ten full years now.
The fact that he was both on a few flight logs, though not to the island itself, and had him at MarALago enough to both ban him and give up information during an investigation says otherwise.
That's all neutral information, that just means he existed in the same circles of rich dudes in Florida/NYC, but its enough to justify investigating to clear him like all police investigations do. And that would leave a paper trail regardless of its findings.
You can't actually be serious....I recognize your username and know you're generally not this retarded.
So he didn't ban him or initiate cooperation with helping during the older investigation? The very information that mostly absolves him of any real suspicion to begin with? I'm fairly certain he himself admits to those two facts, though finding anything on the topic is impossible anymore.
I'll hear confirmation to the contrary, if you have it though. So far its just been "you're retarded (for saying he is innocent until proven guilty)" which makes me feel you don't have any.
I feel like this is a phrasing issue here. Context and phrasing made it sound like you were suspecting criminal conduct because he banned him and supported the investigation. Reading it again I can see how it can come off as you were intending, but I feel less retarded because it seems others also read it that way.
The phrasing is necessary because it meets the two points of "he is on the list" and "why is he on the list" that makes Musk's accusation useless information, which was designed to maximizing manipulation in simply associating his name with it in defiance of information we have confirmation of.
Logically, I don't see how supporting the investigation could indict Trump of criminal conduct short of some 7D chess move, which should have indicated that you weren't reading my point correctly. But I'm just as guilty of that mistake, so no hard feelings my guy.