The phrasing is necessary because it meets the two points of "he is on the list" and "why is he on the list" that makes Musk's accusation useless information, which was designed to maximizing manipulation in simply associating his name with it in defiance of information we have confirmation of.

Logically, I don't see how supporting the investigation could indict Trump of criminal conduct short of some 7D chess move, which should have indicated that you weren't reading my point correctly. But I'm just as guilty of that mistake, so no hard feelings my guy.