The fact that he was both on a few flight logs, though not to the island itself, and had him at MarALago enough to both ban him and give up information during an investigation says otherwise.
That's all neutral information, that just means he existed in the same circles of rich dudes in Florida/NYC, but its enough to justify investigating to clear him like all police investigations do. And that would leave a paper trail regardless of its findings.
So he didn't ban him or initiate cooperation with helping during the older investigation? The very information that mostly absolves him of any real suspicion to begin with? I'm fairly certain he himself admits to those two facts, though finding anything on the topic is impossible anymore.
I'll hear confirmation to the contrary, if you have it though. So far its just been "you're retarded (for saying he is innocent until proven guilty)" which makes me feel you don't have any.
I feel like this is a phrasing issue here. Context and phrasing made it sound like you were suspecting criminal conduct because he banned him and supported the investigation. Reading it again I can see how it can come off as you were intending, but I feel less retarded because it seems others also read it that way.
No, we never did because he wasn't, but it's something that very loud and nasty retards have been screaming about for almost ten full years now.
The fact that he was both on a few flight logs, though not to the island itself, and had him at MarALago enough to both ban him and give up information during an investigation says otherwise.
That's all neutral information, that just means he existed in the same circles of rich dudes in Florida/NYC, but its enough to justify investigating to clear him like all police investigations do. And that would leave a paper trail regardless of its findings.
You can't actually be serious....I recognize your username and know you're generally not this retarded.
So he didn't ban him or initiate cooperation with helping during the older investigation? The very information that mostly absolves him of any real suspicion to begin with? I'm fairly certain he himself admits to those two facts, though finding anything on the topic is impossible anymore.
I'll hear confirmation to the contrary, if you have it though. So far its just been "you're retarded (for saying he is innocent until proven guilty)" which makes me feel you don't have any.
I feel like this is a phrasing issue here. Context and phrasing made it sound like you were suspecting criminal conduct because he banned him and supported the investigation. Reading it again I can see how it can come off as you were intending, but I feel less retarded because it seems others also read it that way.