Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

50
Microsoft delays Fable to 2026 (archive.ph)
posted 1 year ago by ArtemisFoul 1 year ago by ArtemisFoul +50 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 27 ▼
– Ahaus667 27 points 1 year ago +27 / -0

Microsoft is looking at the internals of Avowed and going “oh fuck”.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– llirrem 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Hopefully (a fools hope, unfortunately) they will realize that the gamers don't want what they're peddling and they start making changes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

it would be tough this late in the game. The product is basically finished and the last bits are tied up with the inevitable "fuck it just get it out the door" code.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

That isn't even the real problem. The real reason they couldn't make positive changes is that any developers capable of making those changes haven't worked there in years, and management isn’t competent enough to even diagnose the actual problem.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Arkana 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Yep, most big studios only have ugly women, diversity hires, and mentally ill emasculated men as regular employees. I've heard they contract out programming and work to actually competent developers, but will never keep them as actual employees with decision making power.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Yeah the latest woke games were kicked off during peak clown world era. We'll probably see another 2-3 years of AAA woke flops before they course correct.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RoulerBleu 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Game projects in big studios started today probably still have peak 2024 wokeness baked in every step of the planning.

It will take a long time for studios unshittify themselves or shut down.

There are plenty of smaller studios making good games with no woke, or minimal woke ( stuff most people brush off like women being as strong as men either for ideology of simplicity ).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Lurker404 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

More likely they'll have a meeting about "internet racists, misogynists and Nazis" and double down on the retardation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Galean 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

They'll fine some other reason, bugs, graphics, underdeveloped, not enough marketing. Never are they going to discuss about 'woke' content in any meeting they're going to have.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Hopefully (a fools hope, unfortunately) they will realize that the gamers don't want what they're peddling and they start making changes.

For a moment let's say that actually happens, here's the $CurrentProblem that still exists: These games are taking the better part of a decade to produce so any brand new, fresh creation started this year won't be seen until 2030.

Now maybe these length development times are part of the shitshow, but even if they are not it's still taking forever for many games to come out and so they end up eons behind the cultural curve which is why so many releases now and still DEI infested plagueships finally coming into harbour and with some literally being sunk before they reach ground.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– theaustrianpainter 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Its more likely the girlboss DEI team isnt able to get the game finished on time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– PraiseBeToScience 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

What even was the story? I only remember the Art Director being a massive faggot and I saw some video making fun of just how mid-tier the game was. Had some really cool 'cover art' though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Ahaus667 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I don’t even care about the drama aspects. The game artwork and graphics itself looks like a Skyrim got invaded by a pride parade which was enough to make me pass.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AgnosticTemplar 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Yeah, a lot of the charm of the previous Fable games came from the cartoony art style. Having it be another bland 'photorealistic' AAA game will ruin a lot of that, and if they keep the cartoony proportions for NPCs but with realistic textures they'll be uncanny nightmares like the dwarves in the upcoming Snow White reboot.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RoulerBleu 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Mud Brown and the 7 CGI abominations.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– ArtemisFoul [S] 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

Apologies for the Verge link.

Anyway, in case you don't remember, Fable is the one that showed the character look like this in the trailer: https://files.catbox.moe/r6zf3e.png

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– yeldarb1983 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

...gonna take a wild, crazy guess I now have a general idea what a member of the development team looks like...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Totsugeki 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Ugliest video game character ever. Even that Star Wars lady that looks like a human mop looks better in comparison. I can't even tell what gender this person is supposed to be.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RoulerBleu 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

OH GOD EWWW.

That's the litteral tranny self-insert from a studio employee.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Socalwackjob 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

If they were smart, they would just cancel it but it is typical of western companies to double down on stupid.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– yeldarb1983 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

eh, they really can't this far into the project, there's too much money tied up in it. they've got to forge ahead and hope they can find a window where it can sell enough copies to at least make some of the money back.

a bad release is better than no release at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Erithal 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

a bad release is better than no release at all.

Concord begs to differ, but that's the utmost 1% of woke retardery.

The cynic in me says that, even there-- the 'right' people drew paychecks from Sony, therefore Concord succeeded as a money laundering operation even while failing as a video game

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Socalwackjob 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Sega also did with Hyenas and that was like a few days right before release.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Erithal 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

There is a point where canceling your marketing budget to reclaim it can make more than a woke flop will earn... #justsaying

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yeldarb1983 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I'm sure the execs were happy to get some of the company's money back on concord, even if it was precious little, lol.

The cynic in me says that, even there-- the 'right' people drew paychecks from Sony, therefore Concord succeeded as a money laundering operation even while failing as a video game

wouldn't shock me. they sure rubbed it in the faces of us evil racist, mysogynist fascists that... <checks notes> didn't actually buy the game....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

They didn't get any money back for Concord. They gave a refund to anyone who bought it, just so they could write it off as a complete loss on their taxes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– yeldarb1983 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

ah. i've only been half paying attention to woke games.

I rarely buy anything new these days, so yeah.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RoulerBleu 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Concord pushed the Sunken Cost Fallacy for 2 weeks before firing everyone, refunding all player and shutting down the game.

Not releasing it would have saved money.

Believe it or not, they had a dev team for Concord expansions / seasons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– computadora 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

They also released a very underwhelming "pre-alpha" trailer. I'd be surprised if this even comes out next year. This game was announced in 2020 and this is all they have to show!

There's no way in hell this game doesn't flop majestically. It doesn't even bear a slight resemblance to OG Fable so it's not even going to get sales from the OG fans (like me). Xbox's days seem to be numbered.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Fable fans are probably sighing in relief at that news.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy