I'm sure they're just watching something else, although I'm not sure what he's trying to accomplish telling everyone they're watching Judgment at Nuremberg. Just the standard Jewish schtick of wallowing in Holocaust victimhood?
The Nuremberg tribunals have always bothered me because they are championed as a "triumph of justice", but they were mostly ex post facto crimes invented for the trials. There simply was no concept of "crimes against humanity" or "waging an aggressive war" as a distinctly criminal act prior to this. They also didn't afford the defendants most of the rights somebody being prosecuted in the US would enjoy. I'm not sure how convicting someone at a trial that wouldn't be legal under your own laws can be championed as a Triumph of Justice.
They were simply the allies slapping on a veneer of legality while engaging in the standard age-old practice of executing or jailing the leaders of the losing nation after a war.
11 judges? Lolz, that's hysterical.
Oh: 1 for each nation Japan was at war with, including the Soviets. Kind-of makes sense.
They DIDN'T try the leaders of Unit 731, who had gone to the USA with all of their data... all that is left of the 731 complex is a single outbuilding with a plaque on it...
Which was all worthless nonsense that was barely worth the paper it was printed on unless you really wanted to know the specifics that killing someone in X way is 3 seconds faster than Y method.
They were hoping to get something on the level of the Nazis who had leaps ahead in numerous fields of science, instead they got "the Japs are fucking savages."
Fun Fact: Churchill wanted to use poison gas... on civilians! The plan was to drop gas on 3-4 cities at the same time, wiping out the "military workers". He hoped for 1 million deaths.
Luckily the USA was more interested in The Bomb and were slow in making the stuff. The A-bomb was just a bomb, but gassing 1M civilians is just sick.
Many tons of the stuff was being hauled to Canada for incineration, but a storm sank the barge... so tons of this crap are laying at the bottom of the Atlantic somewhere...
This is why it’s so important that we wrest control of education away from leftists. When they have their druthers, they aggressively brainwash white children to hate themselves.
Oh for sure. But he’s promoting this faux struggle session to “fellow” whites. There’s no dearth of victimhood supremacy training in Jewish households.
In the highly unlikely event you manage to breed, you will indoctrinate your kids into white victimhood. Boo fucking hoo, it’s so hard to be a keyboard warrior. Boo fucking hoo, blame your failures on someone else.
Its okay. They are soft genociding whites/christians, the only demographics that give a shit about them. Doubt africans, pajeets, chinese and etc will give a shit or tolerate their BS.
I feel like it's not true, because if anyone were honestly watching those judgements it would be confusing as hell, and also way too dark for children to be watching. That's assuming that we even know which sentencing he's actually watching. There were a litany of trials that went on for years.
You'd have multiple people being sentenced for crimes against humanity, but you'd also have people being convicted of supporting expansionist aggression, treaty violations, a number of other arcane diplomatic 'crimes', and some people would just be acquitted.
Most people wouldn't even know who they are looking at, or what was even being talked about.
Moreover, the trial was almost entirely about white people trying white people for committing crimes against white people. The Holocaust was one part of the War Crimes trial.
Wait! That's not a picture of a paedophile grooming some little kids? IDK...
TIL: William Shatner was in Judgement at Nuremburg (1961) a fictionalized account of one of the 12 Trials (you knew there were 12 of them, right?) (I didn't either!) of Nazi leaders.
What a star-studded cast! Aside from the headliners: Spencer Tracey & Burt Lancaster, we have: Marlene Dietrich, Maximilian Schell (won the Best Actor Oscar!), Judy Garland (!) Montgomery Clift, William Shatner & Werner Klemperer (Col Klink).
Clift also is listed as a writer too. 🙂
I'm pretty sure the "Holocaust narrative" was established as fact in 1945 when Black US troops found the first death camp. Kareem Abdul Jabbar wrote a book about them :>
I'm sure they're just watching something else, although I'm not sure what he's trying to accomplish telling everyone they're watching Judgment at Nuremberg. Just the standard Jewish schtick of wallowing in Holocaust victimhood?
The Nuremberg tribunals have always bothered me because they are championed as a "triumph of justice", but they were mostly ex post facto crimes invented for the trials. There simply was no concept of "crimes against humanity" or "waging an aggressive war" as a distinctly criminal act prior to this. They also didn't afford the defendants most of the rights somebody being prosecuted in the US would enjoy. I'm not sure how convicting someone at a trial that wouldn't be legal under your own laws can be championed as a Triumph of Justice.
They were simply the allies slapping on a veneer of legality while engaging in the standard age-old practice of executing or jailing the leaders of the losing nation after a war.
They did the same thing to the Japanese, but almost no attention was paid to that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Military_Tribunal_for_the_Far_East
11 judges? Lolz, that's hysterical.
Oh: 1 for each nation Japan was at war with, including the Soviets. Kind-of makes sense.
They DIDN'T try the leaders of Unit 731, who had gone to the USA with all of their data... all that is left of the 731 complex is a single outbuilding with a plaque on it...
Which was all worthless nonsense that was barely worth the paper it was printed on unless you really wanted to know the specifics that killing someone in X way is 3 seconds faster than Y method.
They were hoping to get something on the level of the Nazis who had leaps ahead in numerous fields of science, instead they got "the Japs are fucking savages."
The proof that it's not real: they claim to love the Nuremberg Trial, but also loved mandates for untested gene therapies.
How was WWII any more aggressive than the last war they waged? They didn't even use gas.
Fun Fact: Churchill wanted to use poison gas... on civilians! The plan was to drop gas on 3-4 cities at the same time, wiping out the "military workers". He hoped for 1 million deaths.
Luckily the USA was more interested in The Bomb and were slow in making the stuff. The A-bomb was just a bomb, but gassing 1M civilians is just sick.
Many tons of the stuff was being hauled to Canada for incineration, but a storm sank the barge... so tons of this crap are laying at the bottom of the Atlantic somewhere...
A kangaroo court of revenge
This is actually ritualistic sadism. “Look what we do to the goyim kids. This is what bad goys deserve”
"And this is how you make yourself seem like the victim. It works every time! Goys are so stupid!"
This is the same movie that brought up the "shrunken heads" and "skin shade lamps" which were pure US propaganda.
I'm sure he takes the time to point how how propaganda was used on both side and therefore the truth is terribly muddied.
This is why it’s so important that we wrest control of education away from leftists. When they have their druthers, they aggressively brainwash white children to hate themselves.
They're Jewish
Oh for sure. But he’s promoting this faux struggle session to “fellow” whites. There’s no dearth of victimhood supremacy training in Jewish households.
Al Franken is jewish. He's brainwashing his kids to have an inflated sense of victimhood and to have grievances and hatred against White people.
In the highly unlikely event you manage to breed, you will indoctrinate your kids into white victimhood. Boo fucking hoo, it’s so hard to be a keyboard warrior. Boo fucking hoo, blame your failures on someone else.
Don't you have some Palestinian children to go murder or something?
The holohoax has become part of their religion at this point. Same with many goyim.
That's child abuse.
Yup, those kids are what? 4-8 years old? Watching a dark & dialogue heavy movie. With an 11 minute speech at the end?
He's waiting for them to fall asleep for some "touchy-touchy time" eh? 🤬
lol - he just wants to "tickle their tummies" (see his book)
Historically inaccurate and widely regarded as the biggest farce of justice ever conducted.
I hope this leads to the kids discovering Hogan’s Heroes.
Al Franken is a big fat idiot.
I believe by their social etiquette the proper honorific is "admitted serial sexual assaulter Al Franklin"
The kids look to be on the bored phase of the “tradition.” They’ll reach the rejection phase faster and Al here will have a complete meltdown.
One can hope
I'm more annoyed the fat ass can't scoot over for the poor kid on the end. Wtf
Extreme woke Leftist who became so because of skeletons in his closet no. #7,433
Its okay. They are soft genociding whites/christians, the only demographics that give a shit about them. Doubt africans, pajeets, chinese and etc will give a shit or tolerate their BS.
I'm pretty sure they don't teach or give two craps about the holocaust in India or Pakistan.
In fact, I've seen shit like "The Hitler Cafe" existing there. There were pics on X a while back.
But won't have them watch ICC proceedings.
Maybe he's explain where Grandpa is going
I feel like it's not true, because if anyone were honestly watching those judgements it would be confusing as hell, and also way too dark for children to be watching. That's assuming that we even know which sentencing he's actually watching. There were a litany of trials that went on for years.
You'd have multiple people being sentenced for crimes against humanity, but you'd also have people being convicted of supporting expansionist aggression, treaty violations, a number of other arcane diplomatic 'crimes', and some people would just be acquitted.
Most people wouldn't even know who they are looking at, or what was even being talked about.
Moreover, the trial was almost entirely about white people trying white people for committing crimes against white people. The Holocaust was one part of the War Crimes trial.
Deep Dives can be found here:
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/imtproc_v1menu.asp
https://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/
I think they mean the Spencer Tracy movie
Well, that's just full on retarded. That's not even a thanksgiving movie, and it's also dark as shit.
Watch Bluey or something reasonable with children that young.
He can pair it with "To Kill a Mockingbird," to really add to the vibe.
Then throw in some A Time to Kill to really cement in that self-hate rebar.
Wait! That's not a picture of a paedophile grooming some little kids? IDK...
TIL: William Shatner was in Judgement at Nuremburg (1961) a fictionalized account of one of the 12 Trials (you knew there were 12 of them, right?) (I didn't either!) of Nazi leaders.
What a star-studded cast! Aside from the headliners: Spencer Tracey & Burt Lancaster, we have: Marlene Dietrich, Maximilian Schell (won the Best Actor Oscar!), Judy Garland (!) Montgomery Clift, William Shatner & Werner Klemperer (Col Klink).
Clift also is listed as a writer too. 🙂
It is based on a TV movie from 1959.
That was still while the Holocaust narrative was being formulated
I'm pretty sure the "Holocaust narrative" was established as fact in 1945 when Black US troops found the first death camp. Kareem Abdul Jabbar wrote a book about them :>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunskirchen
Note how the (White) 71st Infantry is given credit, even though the 761st armoured (Black) were the first to enter the camp...
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/brothers-in-arms-kareem-abdul-jabbar/1100624335?ean=9780767909136
Black, Russian troops?