Its like a modern leftists ability to use basic logic and think for themselves, they might get close sometimes and say some stuff that sounds like they realized the actual problem but can never admit it.
It's like trying to approach the speed of light. You require such extreme levels of hatred that your mass converts into teeming ball of plasma-energy hell bent on destroying journalism entirely.
What annoys me is when youtube makes or changes the rules, they dont account for older content and penalize them. If you made videos about white kittens doing silly stuff now and in 5 years leftists claim white kittens are a racist symbol. Youtube can age restrict or even terminate your account despite you were uploading content that was acceptable at the time. Punished for not knowing the future.
It's also funny that YT auto-transcription won't even say certain words. "Faggot" got blanked here, "[ __ ]", and it will do the same to "nigger" or any variants...as well as things it incorrectly thinks were that, like "jigger" or "Niggeman."
I love the fact that RKF Jr's radical stance basically boils down to 'Hey, maybe we shouldn't be stuffing the latest shit into our body without knowing the full long-term consequences of using the damn thing.'
Leftists pretend to worship science while demonizing every effort to force big pharma to legitimately test their products. I can’t think of a more infuriating hypocrisy.
Here's what we can do. Make it okay to market things on television commercials to kids again, because toys are fun. And some of those toy commercials were memorable.
Then make it no longer okay to market pharmaceutical drugs directly to consumers through television.
You don't get to try whatever drug you like because those things are generally prescribed by a doctor for when you actually need them. So you're not getting them, and the commercial obviously isn't for you.
It's entirely to control TV stations. They're going to tell you whatever they're paid to tell you, whether they like it or not.
How does this hack still have a job? There needs to be a rule that, if you ever get utterly blown out in public, like this dude did on Rogan, or with what Kamala had done unto her by Tulsi, you just have to slink away and live out the rest of your days in a cave somewhere. You don't get to go back on TV to peddle the same old evil, and you don't get to be VP.
"...people who have obesity..."
Ahhh, gotta love shifting language.
"...we're talking about obesity the way that we used to talk about depression..."
When, you mean back in the day where a lot less people were depressed? Back then? Before we started "treating" depression like we do now? That way? Just checking...
"...a reductionist view of the world; taking these complicated problems, and boiling them down to a single solution..."
What single solution? The one that you yourself, at the start, admitted he was basically right about, and would likely cure, by your own numbers, seventy percent of people...and would still help the rest? That solution? Because that seems like, at the very least, maybe something we should try. You fucking prick.
"...for people for whom nothing has worked; they've been trying to eat right, exercise, done all the right things...it's not worked..."
Well, that one dude will be very relieved there's a solution now! (Yes, exaggeration, don't @ me, as they say.)
"...these medications, for that percentage of people, may provide a real benefit..."
A real journalist would have asked the obvious follow-up: "What, roughly, would you say is that percentage?"
This is what pissed me off enough to go through this again. We say we hate journalists...but the real problem is we don't have any journalists left in legacy media. Most people on the "pro-journalist" side have never seen a journalist in their lives, and wouldn't recognize one if it bit them on the ass...which is more something these fake and gay propagandists would do, to be fair.
Seriously, though. What fucking percentage? And is it being prescribed above or below that percentage? And how many six year old kids qualify as being people for whom nothing else works? How many people should be taking Ozempic?
Look, I just did more journalism while ranting on the internet over my morning cup of coffee than most of these fucks will do in their sorry lives.
I hate the people that use those types of weight loss drugs that CAN get healthy with basic diet and exercise. It’s incredibly lazy (ironic) and there’s always the possibility of long term side effects that we don’t know about.
It gives me a lot of confidence that the creators of this drug were thinking: WTF? people are actually willing to put this in their body instead of not stuffing their fat, ugly faces?
Ozempic is supposed to help with diabetes and a side effect is appetite suppression. My mom has been on the generic version for awhile for the intended use, but Ozempic is the only one that is approved for the off label weight loss use.
Which is the reason they applied for it after their patent ran out and generics were able to come in and undercut them. They need (want) the money and shit's expensive.
I have an elderly family member who is on ozempic. It has been a game changer for her. But she’s what I call a type 1.5 diabetic - theoretically, she can control her diabetes with diet and exercise, but the genetic component is pretty severe. Plus she’s, you know, fucking 80 years old.
In her case, the drug makes perfect sense. Millions of people taking it on lieu of needed lifestyle changes does not make sense. It’s the usual case of a useful, helpful medication being recklessly expanded to 20x as many people in the name of massive profits.
The thing is that Ozempic still requires lifestyle changes to help you lose weight. People who take it and don't change how they eat have been getting sick and blaming the drug. It literally says that you have to eat less because of that side effect when you're on it.
It suppresses your appetite. If you’re eating for reasons other than appetite - like coping or dopamine - then it doesn’t “stop” that. Turns out most fat people are not fat because they’re “hungry”.
Ozempic lowers your weight while increasing the number of fat cells you have. You end up with more, smaller fat cells.
Which presumably will be screaming "feed me Seymour" whenever you stop taking it, because that's what fat cells do. Fat cells that lose fat tell the body "hey, running out fat here!".
Cannibalism about to skyrocket as people not able to afford more Ozempic eat the first thing they see.
While I might not hate journalists enough, due to the impossibility of such a prospect, I grow nearer to that event horizon day by day.
Its like a modern leftists ability to use basic logic and think for themselves, they might get close sometimes and say some stuff that sounds like they realized the actual problem but can never admit it.
At this point I don’t think they care.
It's like trying to approach the speed of light. You require such extreme levels of hatred that your mass converts into teeming ball of plasma-energy hell bent on destroying journalism entirely.
It's like the old Onion joke. It's too bad no one asked us what we were mad about.
The screen:
"...FAGGOTS, FAGGOTS, FAGGOTS,
FAGGOTS, FAGGOTS, FAGGOTS,
FAGGOTS, FAGGOTS, FAGGOTS..."
Aaaah, even 2012 was a simpler time.
Fuck these faggots, and all their faggotry.
Someone linked this the other day, and it's pretty catchy. Niggas so sensitive.
Literally could not be broadcast on YouTube today, despite the fact that I pulled it from YouTube.
What annoys me is when youtube makes or changes the rules, they dont account for older content and penalize them. If you made videos about white kittens doing silly stuff now and in 5 years leftists claim white kittens are a racist symbol. Youtube can age restrict or even terminate your account despite you were uploading content that was acceptable at the time. Punished for not knowing the future.
It's also funny that YT auto-transcription won't even say certain words. "Faggot" got blanked here, "[ __ ]", and it will do the same to "nigger" or any variants...as well as things it incorrectly thinks were that, like "jigger" or "Niggeman."
They dont even need people to flag and report you anymore. They use AI bots to scan your audio, thumbnails, and footage for things to flag you for.
Well, that's how they apply it to you, as an inferior.
The Onion is protected from arbitrary retroactive regulations like this because it is Regime Media.
Seriously. If Trump were a based modern Julius Cesar he would bring back decimation as a punishment.
You take the group being punished, you gather them together and divide them into groups of ten.
They draw lots to select one. The Classic is a bag with nine white stones and one black stone. Pick one out to determine your fate.
Nine of the group use clubs to beat the tenth to death. The do it together.
Everyone knows that it could have been them. Everyone knows that they were helpless to resist.
They remember forever.
Want to refuse? Sit down and not do it? Great. Get your whole family crucified instead.
I have heard that with Trump in power we are going to be kicking it old school Roman style now. I think it was on MSNBC or CNN or something.
I love the fact that RKF Jr's radical stance basically boils down to 'Hey, maybe we shouldn't be stuffing the latest shit into our body without knowing the full long-term consequences of using the damn thing.'
It's so refreshing to see.
Leftists pretend to worship science while demonizing every effort to force big pharma to legitimately test their products. I can’t think of a more infuriating hypocrisy.
We can trust that big pharma has our best interests at heart. Also we’ve just fined Purdue how much for the opioid crisis?
Leftists used to be anti-big pharma, anti-weapons industry.
Until they got new instructions. Fortunately, there were those whose software's auto-update facility was disabled, like Tulsi and RFK.
Being a hypocrite is only bad if you’re a White Male.
Once a public figure goes conservative, everything they ever said in history is automatically wrong.
Here's what we can do. Make it okay to market things on television commercials to kids again, because toys are fun. And some of those toy commercials were memorable.
Then make it no longer okay to market pharmaceutical drugs directly to consumers through television.
You don't get to try whatever drug you like because those things are generally prescribed by a doctor for when you actually need them. So you're not getting them, and the commercial obviously isn't for you.
It's entirely to control TV stations. They're going to tell you whatever they're paid to tell you, whether they like it or not.
How does this hack still have a job? There needs to be a rule that, if you ever get utterly blown out in public, like this dude did on Rogan, or with what Kamala had done unto her by Tulsi, you just have to slink away and live out the rest of your days in a cave somewhere. You don't get to go back on TV to peddle the same old evil, and you don't get to be VP.
Ahhh, gotta love shifting language.
When, you mean back in the day where a lot less people were depressed? Back then? Before we started "treating" depression like we do now? That way? Just checking...
What single solution? The one that you yourself, at the start, admitted he was basically right about, and would likely cure, by your own numbers, seventy percent of people...and would still help the rest? That solution? Because that seems like, at the very least, maybe something we should try. You fucking prick.
Well, that one dude will be very relieved there's a solution now! (Yes, exaggeration, don't @ me, as they say.)
A real journalist would have asked the obvious follow-up: "What, roughly, would you say is that percentage?"
This is what pissed me off enough to go through this again. We say we hate journalists...but the real problem is we don't have any journalists left in legacy media. Most people on the "pro-journalist" side have never seen a journalist in their lives, and wouldn't recognize one if it bit them on the ass...which is more something these fake and gay propagandists would do, to be fair.
Seriously, though. What fucking percentage? And is it being prescribed above or below that percentage? And how many six year old kids qualify as being people for whom nothing else works? How many people should be taking Ozempic?
Look, I just did more journalism while ranting on the internet over my morning cup of coffee than most of these fucks will do in their sorry lives.
I hate the people that use those types of weight loss drugs that CAN get healthy with basic diet and exercise. It’s incredibly lazy (ironic) and there’s always the possibility of long term side effects that we don’t know about.
archive
It gives me a lot of confidence that the creators of this drug were thinking: WTF? people are actually willing to put this in their body instead of not stuffing their fat, ugly faces?
Ozempic is supposed to help with diabetes and a side effect is appetite suppression. My mom has been on the generic version for awhile for the intended use, but Ozempic is the only one that is approved for the off label weight loss use.
Which is the reason they applied for it after their patent ran out and generics were able to come in and undercut them. They need (want) the money and shit's expensive.
I have an elderly family member who is on ozempic. It has been a game changer for her. But she’s what I call a type 1.5 diabetic - theoretically, she can control her diabetes with diet and exercise, but the genetic component is pretty severe. Plus she’s, you know, fucking 80 years old.
In her case, the drug makes perfect sense. Millions of people taking it on lieu of needed lifestyle changes does not make sense. It’s the usual case of a useful, helpful medication being recklessly expanded to 20x as many people in the name of massive profits.
The thing is that Ozempic still requires lifestyle changes to help you lose weight. People who take it and don't change how they eat have been getting sick and blaming the drug. It literally says that you have to eat less because of that side effect when you're on it.
It suppresses your appetite. If you’re eating for reasons other than appetite - like coping or dopamine - then it doesn’t “stop” that. Turns out most fat people are not fat because they’re “hungry”.
Ozempic lowers your weight while increasing the number of fat cells you have. You end up with more, smaller fat cells.
Which presumably will be screaming "feed me Seymour" whenever you stop taking it, because that's what fat cells do. Fat cells that lose fat tell the body "hey, running out fat here!".
Cannibalism about to skyrocket as people not able to afford more Ozempic eat the first thing they see.
Given the original ideal of "over-consumerism" that zombies often get attributed to, this still seems very fitting. At least they'll be slow zombies.
Well the fat people would probably be faster, they wouldn't have a respiratory system to slow then down, no pain to slow them down.
Ozempic is for diabetes.
Wegovy is for weight loss.
Wegovy has 2.5x the dose of Ozempic.
Considering that CNN would not exist except for big pharma advertising, this is not surprising.
Legacy media is bought and paid for by big pharma advertising, all of them.
silence, foreigners. americans are talking.