Unmarried women shouldn't have the right to vote until they have the obligation to sign up for selective service.
My single sister in law worships Zelensky like a husband. She’s been manipulated into pushing us to the brink of WW3 because of her loneliness and lack of kids.
Women shouldn't be voting period, but I suppose it's negotiable if they see real combat. No getting knocked up before deployment or staying back at base while the men do the fighting.
If the only real demographic that significantly differs is unmarried women, then I suggest we should just not allow women to vote altogether. A woman's husband is all the vote a woman needs.
Do remember this doesn't mean ALL women can see reality after kids and marriage, we've had enough stories of mothers trying to trans their sons to know you shouldn't stick your dick in some crazy.
Hard to know what the key factor is that can turn women. I have personal experience with two women, one family one former friend, who had manic personalities before having kids.
The family one mellowed the fuck out after and become an extremely reliable and sane pillar of the family, the former friend is still crazy and I basically got excommunicated when I said there are fundamental differences in men and women when it comes to the best and worst statistically. Maybe the environment is a factor since the family one I know how she grew up compared to second hand account of the other.
Or maybe all the women voting for civilization-destroying leftist policies and all of the women remaining unmarried and childless are both the result of certain other phenomena. This graph is not a causal loop: it's just a symptom chart.
This plus the fact that they treat big government as a husband replacement explains 95% of womens voting habits, and why both sides of the government are so desperate to pander to them
So you're suggesting it's a chicken/egg kinda situation? That while it could be single women are more prone to paternalistic policy making due to some sort of innate maternal drive, you're suggesting such people are less desirable as a life long partner?
It's not a terrible theory, though there is other elements at play, like long documented generational shifts in voting patterns (eg the young of that era tend to be more inclined to vote left while that same group will end up more right wing as time goes on. Pretty clear cut example of that is hippies being baby boomers). However, there's also the counter point to that about constant political shift, in that today's Republicans are yesterdays Democrats, so have those demographics actually shifted, or has the Overton Window just moved to make them appear more right wing?
The overall point I'm trying to make is that for most of these things that can be presented as chicken vs egg dichotomies, it's less a dichotomy and a little of both, and in some cases can even feed into one another.
I think the weight of the female vote has a greater impact than the natural shift towards conservativism.
If it were as simple as "today's Democrats are tomorrow's Republicans", we would be seeing a steady and gradual increase in people supporting the right/Republicans that matches the steady and gradual aging of populations.
The women I know are perfect voters for the left: they worry about feelings instead of facts, they tend to be less affluent (less to lose when voting for giveaway programs), they seem more trusting of authority, they exhibit cognitive dissonance (if ACAB, why do you only want cops to have guns?). The government standing in for their husband, and every whiny special interest group standing in for their children, pretty much explains their voting habits.
Unmarried women are married to the State. They vote to transfer men's money to themselves. Married women are more likely to vote conservative because they don't want their husband's money going to other women.
Its why girl gamers tend to be healers in video games. Or they play games where their girl voices gives them an edge via manipulation. Both gives them attention and/or act on maternal instincts.
There's a reason why unmarried women after a certain age were pariahs for most of the history of civilization.
Unmarried women shouldn't have the right to vote until they have the obligation to sign up for selective service.
My single sister in law worships Zelensky like a husband. She’s been manipulated into pushing us to the brink of WW3 because of her loneliness and lack of kids.
They vote having no skin in the game.
Women shouldn't be voting period, but I suppose it's negotiable if they see real combat. No getting knocked up before deployment or staying back at base while the men do the fighting.
It's mindblowing that getting knocked up in active service isn't an instant dishonorable discharge.
Well it's also mindblowing that anyone lets women into any armed service outside a Volkssturm situation, but you know.
If the only real demographic that significantly differs is unmarried women, then I suggest we should just not allow women to vote altogether. A woman's husband is all the vote a woman needs.
Do remember this doesn't mean ALL women can see reality after kids and marriage, we've had enough stories of mothers trying to trans their sons to know you shouldn't stick your dick in some crazy.
Hard to know what the key factor is that can turn women. I have personal experience with two women, one family one former friend, who had manic personalities before having kids.
The family one mellowed the fuck out after and become an extremely reliable and sane pillar of the family, the former friend is still crazy and I basically got excommunicated when I said there are fundamental differences in men and women when it comes to the best and worst statistically. Maybe the environment is a factor since the family one I know how she grew up compared to second hand account of the other.
Lol- this just popped up on my news feed :
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-mother-pushes-theythem-pronouns-15-month-old-baby-gay-pride-event
So Many of these mothers have Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy that they call them “munchy moms”
They are certainly chewing the scenery.
Or maybe all the women voting for civilization-destroying leftist policies and all of the women remaining unmarried and childless are both the result of certain other phenomena. This graph is not a causal loop: it's just a symptom chart.
I saw this somewhere else and I'm probably butchering the quote but man is it true.
Civilization ends when women's rights begin.
This plus the fact that they treat big government as a husband replacement explains 95% of womens voting habits, and why both sides of the government are so desperate to pander to them
It isn't clear correlation/causation though. Maybe democrat voting women are much less likely to be married?
So you're suggesting it's a chicken/egg kinda situation? That while it could be single women are more prone to paternalistic policy making due to some sort of innate maternal drive, you're suggesting such people are less desirable as a life long partner?
It's not a terrible theory, though there is other elements at play, like long documented generational shifts in voting patterns (eg the young of that era tend to be more inclined to vote left while that same group will end up more right wing as time goes on. Pretty clear cut example of that is hippies being baby boomers). However, there's also the counter point to that about constant political shift, in that today's Republicans are yesterdays Democrats, so have those demographics actually shifted, or has the Overton Window just moved to make them appear more right wing?
The overall point I'm trying to make is that for most of these things that can be presented as chicken vs egg dichotomies, it's less a dichotomy and a little of both, and in some cases can even feed into one another.
Yeah that's what I am suggesting. I agree that both factors are at play
I think the weight of the female vote has a greater impact than the natural shift towards conservativism.
If it were as simple as "today's Democrats are tomorrow's Republicans", we would be seeing a steady and gradual increase in people supporting the right/Republicans that matches the steady and gradual aging of populations.
The women I know are perfect voters for the left: they worry about feelings instead of facts, they tend to be less affluent (less to lose when voting for giveaway programs), they seem more trusting of authority, they exhibit cognitive dissonance (if ACAB, why do you only want cops to have guns?). The government standing in for their husband, and every whiny special interest group standing in for their children, pretty much explains their voting habits.
This is why the simple solution is to remove their right to vote.
Unmarried women are married to the State. They vote to transfer men's money to themselves. Married women are more likely to vote conservative because they don't want their husband's money going to other women.
Its why girl gamers tend to be healers in video games. Or they play games where their girl voices gives them an edge via manipulation. Both gives them attention and/or act on maternal instincts.
Repeal the 19th and raise the voting age to 25.
Obligatory:
https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/j7kzc2lj667.png