oh and needs to be more physically fit than me, oh and has to make enough money to spend on me, oh and must be better than the 50 guys I’ve banged before combined, oh and must completely devote themselves to me while I look up ways to weaponize the relationship by controlling sex, attention, and affection.
As always replace men with Chad and Tyrone to account for the apex fallacy. You show me a woman a woman who can't find a good man to commit to her, and I'll show you a woman who's rejected hundreds or even thousands of good men for superficial reasons. Good men only show up on their radar when the deadbeats they actually want move onto younger models with less baggage.
You show me a woman a woman who can't find a good man to commit to her, and I'll show you a woman who's rejected hundreds or even thousands of good men for superficial reasons
Her [post wall] body, her [history of bad] choice[s], bigot 👏👏👏
Note: Those claps are not coming from her hands, it's her legs as she waddles to the fridge.
And will never lift a finger to give such devotion back to him. She'll still be free to flirt (ie "meet people") in the wild, dance around the line of infidelity until she eventually slips over and "just-happened" the relationship into the toilet.
As a tall guy I can tell you that everything else you listed means nothing as long as you got that height to tower over her and the bulk to back it up.
Probably depends on what kind of lanklet we are dealing with. Just a regular skinny dude who is very tall probably ranks pretty high, while beanpoles who can barely keep a scrap of muscle on their bones fall down the list below the short muscle men. Which becomes a problem the higher you go, as few men have the genes to be Andre the Giant sized in both manners.
Though working against muscle guys is that women have no concept of what muscle actually is. So unless you build for that specific "looks" type of gains (aka abs and bicep size), it won't gain you as much as you think. Guys like Rogan don't fulfill that very well, even if they might actually have powerlifter strength.
They want someone who can protect them physically and take care of them financially so they can raise a family. They can't fight their own biology same as we can't when we want a healthy female to fuck and raise kids.
She's not yours, it's just your turn. They're always looking for the guy who's a little taller, a little better looking, or a little richer. Commitment doesn't mean jack shit from a woman, so it's foolish to give it as a man.
I kind of wish it wasn't. Don't get me wrong, it makes logical sense given the reality on the ground but it's also a very defeatist attitude. "Just don't bother because we have given up trying to figure out how to fix the problem."
I think you have a misunderstanding of MGTOW. Most of the guys are saying you should give up trying to date women because the way the game works is setup such that you're going to fail as a man. Women are just not worth your time. However, fixing society is still something MGTOW men are interested in but most men have no power to fix anything. In fact, boycotting women is often the only power move men have and if enough men stopped dating women altogether you might actually start getting changes to society.
Not only is not dating women a direct bargaining chip, but fear of becoming undatable via the whisper network seems to keep a lot of men from really voicing their minds and properly fighting back with all the shit women get up to when they band together.
Once that fear is gone maybe more guys will find their spines again.
I consumed their content for several years in the past. I don't misunderstand them, they're simply dead wrong about abstaining from women being a solution to anything.
It's trivially easy to please a male. You just have to be moderately attractive and a nice person who cares about them. Yet the overwhelming majority of women fail to meet these simple prerequisites.
I have never met a man in my entire life that has judged a woman based on their height, education, job, or wealth. We do judge based on weight and looks, but that's just biology- you're not going to want to mate with someone if you don't find them physically attractive.
My whole thing comes down to literally just take care of yourself. I don't even say it as a thing to hurt anyone's feelings (usually), but hell, think of what that woman will be in I don't know 15 or so years when things start to fall apart - not taking care of yourself is a liability and it is not an unreasonable expectation to do as much.
Okay for one thing, you can change waist size, so you just proved yourself stupid in the first frame.
Secondly, I tend to believe there are a lot fewer guys that care about T&A and more about personality than there are women who care about shallow things (just guessing but it seems that way)
Got banned for a day on that comment section. Women are truly lost. The amount of delusion there is insane and actually really proves that women are a big part of why everything is going to shit.
Girls just want someone tall…
oh and needs to be more physically fit than me, oh and has to make enough money to spend on me, oh and must be better than the 50 guys I’ve banged before combined, oh and must completely devote themselves to me while I look up ways to weaponize the relationship by controlling sex, attention, and affection.
And they wonder why men “don’t commit”
As always replace men with Chad and Tyrone to account for the apex fallacy. You show me a woman a woman who can't find a good man to commit to her, and I'll show you a woman who's rejected hundreds or even thousands of good men for superficial reasons. Good men only show up on their radar when the deadbeats they actually want move onto younger models with less baggage.
Her [post wall] body, her [history of bad] choice[s], bigot 👏👏👏
Note: Those claps are not coming from her hands, it's her legs as she waddles to the fridge.
Which she won't actually appreciate but saying it feels nice.
And will never lift a finger to give such devotion back to him. She'll still be free to flirt (ie "meet people") in the wild, dance around the line of infidelity until she eventually slips over and "just-happened" the relationship into the toilet.
(Whoops! Tripped and fell on a dick!... that I've been "talking" to for months...)
Then proceeds to blame it on the husband or boyfriend.
As a tall guy I can tell you that everything else you listed means nothing as long as you got that height to tower over her and the bulk to back it up.
Sorry to my lanklet giant bros.
How do lanklets fare against muscular manlets like Toe Rogan? (but without his money or fame)
Probably depends on what kind of lanklet we are dealing with. Just a regular skinny dude who is very tall probably ranks pretty high, while beanpoles who can barely keep a scrap of muscle on their bones fall down the list below the short muscle men. Which becomes a problem the higher you go, as few men have the genes to be Andre the Giant sized in both manners.
Though working against muscle guys is that women have no concept of what muscle actually is. So unless you build for that specific "looks" type of gains (aka abs and bicep size), it won't gain you as much as you think. Guys like Rogan don't fulfill that very well, even if they might actually have powerlifter strength.
They want someone who can protect them physically and take care of them financially so they can raise a family. They can't fight their own biology same as we can't when we want a healthy female to fuck and raise kids.
But he's tall. There's no reason to divorce him. Surely this random hoe wouldn't lie about her long unattainable list of demands?
She's not yours, it's just your turn. They're always looking for the guy who's a little taller, a little better looking, or a little richer. Commitment doesn't mean jack shit from a woman, so it's foolish to give it as a man.
MGTOW is pretty well received on this board so it's all good.
I kind of wish it wasn't. Don't get me wrong, it makes logical sense given the reality on the ground but it's also a very defeatist attitude. "Just don't bother because we have given up trying to figure out how to fix the problem."
I think you have a misunderstanding of MGTOW. Most of the guys are saying you should give up trying to date women because the way the game works is setup such that you're going to fail as a man. Women are just not worth your time. However, fixing society is still something MGTOW men are interested in but most men have no power to fix anything. In fact, boycotting women is often the only power move men have and if enough men stopped dating women altogether you might actually start getting changes to society.
Not only is not dating women a direct bargaining chip, but fear of becoming undatable via the whisper network seems to keep a lot of men from really voicing their minds and properly fighting back with all the shit women get up to when they band together.
Once that fear is gone maybe more guys will find their spines again.
I consumed their content for several years in the past. I don't misunderstand them, they're simply dead wrong about abstaining from women being a solution to anything.
Posting memes about how retarded women are is like stealing candy from a baby.
On the other hand, babies shouldn't have candy, it's bad for them. Someone has the be the responsible adult, they aren't going to stop themselves.
I just want a Tomboy as I want a straight, biological female with a more logical mind so I don't have to deal with as much BS.
I'm already investing in shares in cat products, ice cream and male body pillows when these women hit the wall...
Don't forget boxed wine, overpriced mid tier chocolate bars and hard seltzer.
The difference is of course that these aren't exactly demands on the man's part just nice things vs what is a prerequisite for most women these days.
Watch her flip her shit if you demand women atleast be under 200lbs.
It's trivially easy to please a male. You just have to be moderately attractive and a nice person who cares about them. Yet the overwhelming majority of women fail to meet these simple prerequisites.
I have never met a man in my entire life that has judged a woman based on their height, education, job, or wealth. We do judge based on weight and looks, but that's just biology- you're not going to want to mate with someone if you don't find them physically attractive.
My whole thing comes down to literally just take care of yourself. I don't even say it as a thing to hurt anyone's feelings (usually), but hell, think of what that woman will be in I don't know 15 or so years when things start to fall apart - not taking care of yourself is a liability and it is not an unreasonable expectation to do as much.
Women rate 80% of men as ''below average attractiveness'' whereas men rate women as a near-perfect curve.
To women, 80% of men are invisible. They only see the top 5% as ''desirable'', and the next 15% as ''may settle for that''.
Then they turn around and pull the shit the woman in the video did, totally oblivious to their hubris.
Okay for one thing, you can change waist size, so you just proved yourself stupid in the first frame.
Secondly, I tend to believe there are a lot fewer guys that care about T&A and more about personality than there are women who care about shallow things (just guessing but it seems that way)
invidious https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=pNWGoadDRuE
Having watched it ... Why the fuck did you even post this?
because he's your daily DoomerPill
Got banned for a day on that comment section. Women are truly lost. The amount of delusion there is insane and actually really proves that women are a big part of why everything is going to shit.
Dude, just look at her apartment.