Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

60
Anthropological Societies Ban Discussion of Biological Sex to Protect ‘Trans and LGBTQI’ Communities (www.breitbart.com)
posted 2 years ago by TerpenoidTester 2 years ago by TerpenoidTester +60 / -0
Anthropological Societies Ban Discussion of Biological Sex
Two anthropological societies canceled a discussion on the importance of biological sex, citing harm to the “Trans and LGBTQI” communities.
www.breitbart.com
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 57 ▼
– GeronimoJackson 57 points 2 years ago +57 / -0

Science is so fucked. The skill and discipline revolving around 'observing' things, now requires you to close your eyes. Doesn't matter if its archaeology, climate, geology, close your eyes. Stop noticing things. You might harm retards with factual observations.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– weezkitty 25 points 2 years ago +25 / -0

"science". The scientific method requires the ability to question everything

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– MLGS 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

The phrase you're looking for is "replication crisis".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– freespeechsquid 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

The skill and discipline revolving around 'observing' things, now requires you to close your eyes.

This is the best and most succinct way I've ever seen the problem phrased.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 41 ▼
– Kaarous 41 points 2 years ago +41 / -0

The dark ages were preferable to this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– FrozeInFear 26 points 2 years ago +26 / -0

This. There is going to be so much humanity will have to "decipher" if we ever get back to knowing truths.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– lapalapa 26 points 2 years ago +26 / -0

The medieval ages weren't 'dark'. They were full of innovation, technological growth and religious virtue. You're leaning on old leftist mainstream lies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– Kaarous 24 points 2 years ago +24 / -0

They're colloquially known as the dark ages due to the immense loss of knowledge and technology because of the fall of Rome. Humanity forgot concrete and sanitation for centuries, among many other things.

It had many positive aspects as well, but many negative.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– lapalapa 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

They're colloquially known as the dark ages due to the immense loss of knowledge and technology because of the fall of Rome.

Nah, they're called dark due to idiotic stereotypes.

It had many positive aspects as well, but many negative.

As you more or less implied, The 21st century is going to be a lot worse than the worst of medieval misinformation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– PM_ME_RARE_PEPES 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

I thought the Dark Ages referred to the period of Germanic migrations that preceded the Middle Ages, and were called that because we know little about them compared with the Late Roman Empire or the early medieval era.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– lapalapa 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

I've never heard the term used outside of synonymous with medieval.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– activated_almonds 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Specifically early medieval, not high or late medieval. 650 to 1000 AD or so.

You know, after Islamists began executing slave raids all across the Med.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 27 points 2 years ago +27 / -0

Denying reality to help the insane, lazy parenting 101.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– TerpenoidTester [S] 24 points 2 years ago +24 / -0

On September 25, the American Anthropological Association (AAA) and the Canadian Anthropology Society (CASCA) wrote a letter canceling the upcoming conference panel, “Let’s Talk About Sex, Baby: Why biological sex remains a necessary analytic category in anthropology,” which they had previously accepted.

Of course Canada is somehow involved.

“The reason the session deserved further scrutiny was that the ideas were advanced in such a way as to cause harm to members represented by the Trans and LGBTQI of the anthropological community as well as the community at large,” the rejection letter declared.

"The community at large"...huh?

The panel proposed and initially accepted for the annual AAA/CASCA fall meeting noted that “there are multiple domains of research in which biological sex remains irreplaceably relevant to anthropological analysis” and therefore cannot simply be substituted with “gender.”

“Contesting the transition from sex to gender in anthropological scholarship deserves much more critical consideration than it has hitherto received in major disciplinary fora,” the proposal read.

Ready for some bullshit?

“This decision was based on extensive consultation and was reached in the spirit of respect for our values, the safety and dignity of our members, and the scientific integrity of the program(me),” the letter said.

At least the people involved had some pushback.

In their response to the letter, the six panelists — all serious scholars — note their puzzlement “at the AAA/CASCA adopting as its own official stance that to support the continued use of biological sex categories (e.g., male and female; man and woman) is to imperil the safety of the LGBTQI community.”

The panel “included a group of diverse women, one of whom is a lesbian,” the response observes. “In addition to having three fields of anthropology presented in our panel, our panel also included anthropologists from four countries with three languages – an international panel concerned about the erasure of women.”

Hey, they've got some balls!

Anthropologists around the world “will quite rightly find chilling this declaration of war on dissent and on scholarly controversy,” they conclude. “It is a profound betrayal of the AAA’s principle of ‘advancing human understanding and applying this understanding to the world’s most pressing problems.’”

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– censorthisss 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

They should start calling their cult "Science+" like what happened to the atheist community.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SarcasticRidley 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Canadian Anthropology Society (CASCA)

Trauma incoming.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Erithal 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

What institution's acronym is GRIFFITH again?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 19 points 2 years ago +19 / -0

Fucking cultists everywhere.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– OmegaBird 19 points 2 years ago +19 / -0

Trannies should be committed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 18 points 2 years ago +18 / -0

Thier enablers even more so

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Ahaus667 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

On September 25, the American Anthropological Association (AAA) and the Canadian Anthropology Society (CASCA) wrote a letter canceling the upcoming conference panel, “Let’s Talk About Sex, Baby: Why biological sex remains a necessary analytic category in anthropology,” which they had previously accepted.

So it was already cringey as fuck, but it’s nice to see we will no longer be assuming the gender of any human remains anymore….

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– realerfunction 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

bring on the genocide.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Lets ignore science because feelings might be hurt and it doesnt validate some wacko's dilusions. Nice.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I have degrees in anthropology, this is such a sad thing to see.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– activated_almonds 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I am reminded of the South Park episode in which Butters becomes the "anti-toxicity" filter for celebrities, and the villain is Reality, who tells them things they don't want to hear.

They lynch him in the town square at the finale, and the end credits are silent.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy