Home Secretary Suella Braverman claims illegal migration is 'existential challenge' and hits out at 'dogma of multiculturalism'
Just a few days before the Conservative Party conference, the home secretary set out how she thought the global asylum system should be changed. The address was made to a US think tank as Ms Braverman visited Washington DC.
No host population has ever given majority approval for mass immigration. Immigrants only want to to go to already prosperous nations, and prosperous populations are never served by mass immigration. It’s tautological.
That's probably one of the best single sentence summations of the issue I've heard.
I would counterpoint though on "and prosperous populations are never served by mass immigration" The richest are served by cheap labour, and more importantly labour who's presence is based on compliance. A corrupt owner doesn't want 0 deportations, they want to be able to report uppity or non compliant workers and have them deported.
Or wait until payday before "remembering" they have no right to work or even be in the country.
The few instances I've seen where people have voted on it, they overwhelmingly voted to stop immigration, but their votes were either ignored by the politicians or thrown out by activist judges.
Similiarly, politicians care about one thing--growth. Growth makes their jobs easy. If your population is growing, your tax base is growing, your income is growing, you don't have to make many hard choices. It's a game of kick the can down the road.
But growth for the sake of growth is a self-defeating action. While politicians care about AGGREGATE growth, what we as individuals care about is per capita growth.
While the wealthy benefit from cheap labor, the lower end of the labor pool suffers, greatly.
They're invaders, the response is simple. Sink the boats and drown them.
I'd prefer cheap to quick. There's an awful lot of them after all, and bullets are expensive.
Mm, yes, perfect.
Why? Do you think they would be any more humane to you?
Wasn't there a Moroccan found in Italy with chopped up body parts from little girls in a suitcase? At this point it's wrong to not be actively inhumane to them.
This misplaced sympathy is the problem.
They are invaders. They deserve death for attacking first.
South Africa fell to immigrants specifically because the were not willing to use Military force to defend their borders from immigrants. The response of a two tiered citizenship was always doomed to failure.
Who the hell cares about a handful of boat-people? It's the 1 MILLION+ NET INCREASE of "muh legal immigrants" I want to stop by any means necessary.
At this point net-zero immigration isn't enough. Millions have to go back.
She's putting on a show. This same refrain has been heard from 'conservative neoliberal' parties all over Europe. The only thing that changes is a cosmetic make-over of the existing 'laws' and nothing else. Perhaps they'll make a show of deporting a couple of illegal immigrants but nothing of consequence.
The UK is addicted to mass immigration in order to boost population numbers. It's also a massive real estate scam that will make real estate holders lavishly rich. It's also used to compensate and mask the complete and absolute failure of modern feminism (lack of children).
In NYC they're offering landlords 10k as a renting bonus for each apartment given to a migrant. And roughly 3k a month rent with 2 years paid in full on the migrant moving in.
It's a great scam for landlords especially if they don't care about the building and what is going to happen 2 years from now when the city can't afford the rent anymore and you can't kick out the migrants.
when they ARE asked, they reject it.
but somehow they still get it.
She's part of the problem. . What a joke, .
But they've only been in power for [checks notes]... 13 years. What can you even do in that amount of time with majority leadership in parliament? It's not like she's the... Home Secretary.
The only reason she's latching on to illegal immigration is to distract from unfettered legal immigration. Put the focus on the smaller problem so it looks like they are taking action and tackling serious issues.
Doesn't the UK (and most of Europe) still have old WW2 fortifications or at least their foundations all around the coastline?
Wouldn't it be easier to update them with modern weaponry to blast any boat trying to pass?
Most of those tiny boats could be easily intercepted by the coast guard. Many in fact do get intercepted. The problem is the 'procedural framework' in processing the illegal immigrants and the 'due process' involved.
It's not an issue of 'could they?' Rather, it's an issue of 'will they?'
I understand that, and you're right along with the logistics of it all..
..but please understand my need to put Howeitzers on the coastline and wanting to eventually make automated turrets so we get closer to C&C base building technology.
Peace through power?
One vision, one purpose..
Tesla coils or prism towers?
I was thinking more Tiberium lasers and auto turrets but wouldn't say no to Red Alert Tesla coils and Prism towers
“And”
I like the way you think.
They have a fucking Navy. The simple fact is, Western governments want this.
I wish the UK was using the kind of language in the OP. Enoch Powell was right, he was just overly optimistic, and underestimated the scale of the attack.
Rivers of Blood.
ROME - Who Only Europe Know
Media cucks talking about Powell's speech. (lol) They also got completely destroyed in the comments.
The whole thing is so monumentally frustrating. Whites are called racist for wanting to defend ourselves, and yet the elites use race and immigration as a weapon against us, and have admitted as much numerous times. I don't want to give a shit about race. I wouldn't say I am "racist." But I do want to defend myself. Stop importing people that hate us, and stop training everyone to hate us, and I can go back to not giving a shit about race. Fucking leave me alone.
They can also tow them back to where they came from then sink the ship. Or just send the Nato to take Lybia and contain them there. Probably less bad news than sinking ships on the seas. But then better improve the eastern EU flank security.
The problem are the human rights laws, everyone who commanded it or did the deed would be in prison afterwards. If it is on record. Best they could do without going full dictorship is change Asylum laws EU wide then have secure proccess facilities and anyone without a pass gets send back to Lybia.