Screw those people, you can just read all the hate for men flowing from those POSs posts. They want zero responsibility for women and more placed on men. It's no wonder men are saying fuck it and living without women.
Another day, another giant advertisement for MGTOW. The funny part is the deadbeats they choose to reproduce with won't have anything for them to steal, since the stable guy with the good job only gets considered once she needs a paypig to support the bastards she made with neighborhood drug dealer.
I'm reading the comments and they are adamant that they don't want a man to pay - they want every man to pay. If such a proposal of a universal bachelor tax goes ahead to transfer wealth from men to women and children, not even MGTOW will be able to escape unless you emigrate. Problem then is that other countries will follow suit.
If such a proposal of a universal bachelor tax goes ahead to transfer wealth from men to women and children
They don't even need to do something as openly unpopular as a bachelor tax. Our taxes already massively exist just to funnel men's money to women and children.
WIC is a single government program that doesn't even hide that it exists only for that purpose, and its basically free money for any woman who has a baby. Most welfare programs and even anti-poverty/crime prevention programs massively favor women (and their bastard offsprings) to a point where men can barely get in because of how full they are with women who are far better off.
Every single government program is funded by men, who pay more taxes because we work considerably more, and then the spoils go to everyone but them.
Imp it has been a long time. Have you ever heard of black people? We have them in America. They exhibit incredibly disproportionately high rates of fatherlessness and elective abortion (along with violent crime, std's, hard drug consumption and many other winner stats)
What Ron did here was use male terms to refer specifically to black men. Just as a propaganda outlet will refer to black murderers and thieves as "youths".
Ron is talking to/about black people, however, he still plans to use these narratives to steal from white men and distribute the income to women and blacks. What he is saying is that if black women get more free gibs per child they will murder fewer children. Which is a tested and true fact.
It is an anti-White candidate speaking. The end function of his statement is to use tax money to help enact demographic change.
white women single-motherhood is skyrocketing, and on the exact same trajectory as black women just delayed about 2 decades. the majority of white mothers are single mothers, not married mothers.
white women are just as incapable of taking care of themselves as black women. they are women, after all. they require the resources and protection of men to survive. this will be extracted by force from men as women control government and society.
why submit to a man for resources and protection when you can simply use the government to enslave them all?
The book Coming Apart examines the decline of white morals specifically. It's an interesting way to look,because most studies of, say fatherlessness focus on niggers. And their oddity warps statistics. But basically the same shit that has happened to blacks has happened to whites to a lesser degree.
Like before we declare victory on being superior we should compare ourselves to our former selves.
The question is not "who is/isnt in the population" so much as "who is/isnt paying child support"
I wont pontificate. I like your argument and I would say you are not a dick or a fool. But I have developed the sixth sense known as racism and I know how to use it.
Yup, that definitely shows me and "my buddies" chatting. And "we" are definitely discussing user action, rather than mod response. The plain meaning of words is definitely not important.
You skipped the part where the government takes a cut. As long they get their piece, they don't care about anything else. They will make damned sure they get their cut.
Its almost like that old Al Capone/tax evasion joke.
I've seen guys commit half a dozen petty crimes without even having a whiff of police care to come get them. But they miss a child support payment and that motherfucker has a warrant by the weekend and a cell by the month's end.
Government wants its money, and it'll enforce those payments so it can take is cut above anything that effects the peasant class.
The quickest way to get pay disputes resolved is to report your employer to the Department of Labor. Unlike every other government department, they WILL haul ass if their tax revenue is being threatened.
Not strictly relevant to any of the hoes this plan applies to, since step one in raising kids right is having a father around.
But if you are planning on doing parenthood right, there are a few extra medical costs you should take on during pregnancy, and various supplements and extra nutritional needs you might consider to ensure they're as healthy as possible when they're born.
Can't we just start treating abortion as murder and impose the death penalty? It would have the added bonus of removing woke whores from the electorate.
Probably cheaper to just off the girl lol... like ralph bashed in that whores face on a guard rail in the sopranos. Pretty much giving guys a "no way out".
Yup. I'd never allow myself to be extorted like that. If I'm going down I'm taking her with me. Of course MGTOW avoids the problem in the first place.
And DoM, I straight up advocate avoiding the problem in the first place, so this isn't a call for anything you fucking retard. Go find another community to poison.
Women keeps talking about abortions.. they only abort when it inconvenience them and being in the way of their aspirations. But they dont abort when it inconvenience the guy and in the way of the guys aspirations.
Well, the baby will directly cut into her profit margins. But it'll give her a direct cut into his without any further effort.
Its a logical decision for them to make, set up under the assumption that women are human and good enough to not create and ruin a child's life just for profit and status. Which, lol.
Feminists want that. They want us to get violent so they can escalate their rhetoric.
Feminism passes all six Stanton genocide tests, which were approved by the US State Department in 1994 as a way to monitor the rise of ideologies that could commit genocide.
I'm not calling for anything, especially since our subhuman janny is looking for any pretext to break out the banhammer. I'll just note that the most dangerous man is the one with nothing left to lose, and the family courts are tailor made to create such men.
Both the likes of DeSantis and feminists will eventually push for the idea of men as a collective paying for women and children as a collective via law. In the past it used to be called a "bachelor tax" and generally happened when there was an increase in childlessness and a decrease in marriage. It will be branded as a victory for "gender equality".
"Wow then a lot of guys won't be having sex" then so be it.
The problem with your idea is that the guy's left having sex won't be the morally upright and disciplined good men. It'll be the low IQ animals who can't think beyond their next meal who are now filling the holes left behind.
So now the gene pool will be even further diluted and polluted by the absolute worst traits of men.
That's why you can't passively punish women. Because there will always be enough men to subsidize their life and prevent them from going without. Whether its for sex, money, or support.
Screw those people, you can just read all the hate for men flowing from those POSs posts. They want zero responsibility for women and more placed on men. It's no wonder men are saying fuck it and living without women.
Another day, another giant advertisement for MGTOW. The funny part is the deadbeats they choose to reproduce with won't have anything for them to steal, since the stable guy with the good job only gets considered once she needs a paypig to support the bastards she made with neighborhood drug dealer.
I'm reading the comments and they are adamant that they don't want a man to pay - they want every man to pay. If such a proposal of a universal bachelor tax goes ahead to transfer wealth from men to women and children, not even MGTOW will be able to escape unless you emigrate. Problem then is that other countries will follow suit.
They don't even need to do something as openly unpopular as a bachelor tax. Our taxes already massively exist just to funnel men's money to women and children.
WIC is a single government program that doesn't even hide that it exists only for that purpose, and its basically free money for any woman who has a baby. Most welfare programs and even anti-poverty/crime prevention programs massively favor women (and their bastard offsprings) to a point where men can barely get in because of how full they are with women who are far better off.
Every single government program is funded by men, who pay more taxes because we work considerably more, and then the spoils go to everyone but them.
Imp it has been a long time. Have you ever heard of black people? We have them in America. They exhibit incredibly disproportionately high rates of fatherlessness and elective abortion (along with violent crime, std's, hard drug consumption and many other winner stats)
What Ron did here was use male terms to refer specifically to black men. Just as a propaganda outlet will refer to black murderers and thieves as "youths".
Ron is talking to/about black people, however, he still plans to use these narratives to steal from white men and distribute the income to women and blacks. What he is saying is that if black women get more free gibs per child they will murder fewer children. Which is a tested and true fact.
It is an anti-White candidate speaking. The end function of his statement is to use tax money to help enact demographic change.
blacks are 13% of the population.
white women single-motherhood is skyrocketing, and on the exact same trajectory as black women just delayed about 2 decades. the majority of white mothers are single mothers, not married mothers.
white women are just as incapable of taking care of themselves as black women. they are women, after all. they require the resources and protection of men to survive. this will be extracted by force from men as women control government and society.
why submit to a man for resources and protection when you can simply use the government to enslave them all?
Underrated comment
The book Coming Apart examines the decline of white morals specifically. It's an interesting way to look,because most studies of, say fatherlessness focus on niggers. And their oddity warps statistics. But basically the same shit that has happened to blacks has happened to whites to a lesser degree.
Like before we declare victory on being superior we should compare ourselves to our former selves.
The question is not "who is/isnt in the population" so much as "who is/isnt paying child support"
I wont pontificate. I like your argument and I would say you are not a dick or a fool. But I have developed the sixth sense known as racism and I know how to use it.
Stop derailing my posts.
Sorry the world isn't the way you envision it
Imp asking you to stay on topic is irony so dense, it forms a singularity.
I still have an archive of you and your buddies hinting to use false reports on me.
Yup, that definitely shows me and "my buddies" chatting. And "we" are definitely discussing user action, rather than mod response. The plain meaning of words is definitely not important.
Take your meds.
Zero awareness.
That's was actually a pretty good joke. Best post you've ever made here.
Monetary support for what? The child isn't born yet. As if men weren't disadvantaged enough in relationships already.
You're right on this one. This is absolutely ridiculous. An absolute simp move.
Existing. Everything else is just a pretext.
Exactly. They call it child support.
There is absolutely no legal requirement it is spent on the child.
You skipped the part where the government takes a cut. As long they get their piece, they don't care about anything else. They will make damned sure they get their cut.
Its almost like that old Al Capone/tax evasion joke.
I've seen guys commit half a dozen petty crimes without even having a whiff of police care to come get them. But they miss a child support payment and that motherfucker has a warrant by the weekend and a cell by the month's end.
Government wants its money, and it'll enforce those payments so it can take is cut above anything that effects the peasant class.
The quickest way to get pay disputes resolved is to report your employer to the Department of Labor. Unlike every other government department, they WILL haul ass if their tax revenue is being threatened.
It's reminiscent to how divorce courts can reward the female divorcee with quite a bit of a man's wealth, just for simply being his wife.
Not strictly relevant to any of the hoes this plan applies to, since step one in raising kids right is having a father around.
But if you are planning on doing parenthood right, there are a few extra medical costs you should take on during pregnancy, and various supplements and extra nutritional needs you might consider to ensure they're as healthy as possible when they're born.
I support paying child support from conception if, and only if, men are the sole decision makers over whether or not their woman gets an abortion.
Can't we just start treating abortion as murder and impose the death penalty? It would have the added bonus of removing woke whores from the electorate.
Probably cheaper to just off the girl lol... like ralph bashed in that whores face on a guard rail in the sopranos. Pretty much giving guys a "no way out".
Yup. I'd never allow myself to be extorted like that. If I'm going down I'm taking her with me. Of course MGTOW avoids the problem in the first place.
And DoM, I straight up advocate avoiding the problem in the first place, so this isn't a call for anything you fucking retard. Go find another community to poison.
Women keeps talking about abortions.. they only abort when it inconvenience them and being in the way of their aspirations. But they dont abort when it inconvenience the guy and in the way of the guys aspirations.
Its fucked.
Well, the baby will directly cut into her profit margins. But it'll give her a direct cut into his without any further effort.
Its a logical decision for them to make, set up under the assumption that women are human and good enough to not create and ruin a child's life just for profit and status. Which, lol.
Feminists want that. They want us to get violent so they can escalate their rhetoric.
Feminism passes all six Stanton genocide tests, which were approved by the US State Department in 1994 as a way to monitor the rise of ideologies that could commit genocide.
Classification : "The problem is men."
Symbolization : "Men are born with bias against women" This is ironically projection.
Dehumanization : #KillAllMen, "Crush the Patriarchy", various media articles stating hating men is good from mainstream media.
Organization : The push for female representation.
Polarization : The idea that everyone who opposes women is an "incel" who is a threat to society.
Preparation : Laws created to defend women who kill men.
Missing : Extermination and Denial.
These steps are based off the rise of the ideology that led to the Rwandan Genocide.
I'm not calling for anything, especially since our subhuman janny is looking for any pretext to break out the banhammer. I'll just note that the most dangerous man is the one with nothing left to lose, and the family courts are tailor made to create such men.
Yes, and if you read my comment, you'll understand why.
They want violence. They want an excuse to go to Step 7.
The child support is being paied to the woman, because the reasoning boils-down to : women are children.
Both the likes of DeSantis and feminists will eventually push for the idea of men as a collective paying for women and children as a collective via law. In the past it used to be called a "bachelor tax" and generally happened when there was an increase in childlessness and a decrease in marriage. It will be branded as a victory for "gender equality".
OK so what should happen after pregnancy to ensure the child grows up in a decent home, assuming it's not aborted? Better adoption or foster care?
The problem with your idea is that the guy's left having sex won't be the morally upright and disciplined good men. It'll be the low IQ animals who can't think beyond their next meal who are now filling the holes left behind.
So now the gene pool will be even further diluted and polluted by the absolute worst traits of men.
That's why you can't passively punish women. Because there will always be enough men to subsidize their life and prevent them from going without. Whether its for sex, money, or support.
I see women taking child support for 8 to 9 mths then terminating
This is actually a good idea in theory, it's just that it would be exploited to no end by whores trying to get an easy buck.
Today, I never liked him.