In a way, it's worse than banning, and it happens on all social media in one way or another. They all have their thumbs heavily on the scale of "the algorithm". At least with outright banning, you can explain to normies "Look, this is banned". With shadow banning, it takes a few sentences to explain it, then a few more to explain how drastically it limits how many people will see it, at which point they've lost interest or decided you're a conspiracy theorist or whatever. The purpose of shadowbanning is to effectively ban speech while denying a simple, clear cut talking point to people who care about freedom of speech.
They even have a "Visibility Filter" graybox over the pinned Daily Wire free movie tweet so that you have to manually remove the censorship cover to see the movie preview details underneath.
I hate to sound like I'm defending the guy and twitter again, but it's not shadow banning. Shadow banning would make your content not visible to anyone without you knowing. It's a related category of content moderation.
I do agree that it should be transparently marked and explained on the content if you've been artificially downranked, because otherwise it's too close to a shadow ban. I also don't agree with downranking for anything but trending pages, and certainly not for this movie.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse at this point, but he gave the game away months ago when he confirmed that saying trannies deserve to die isn't allowed.
Oh the duality of being both a globohomo puppet and the richest shitposter on earth. I know I've said it a million times on other accounts I have long forgotten the passwords to but it was fun while it lasted.
trannies are the ultimate class. they wont stop until you suck their lady dick or love that festering wound on their crotch. sing praises on how beautiful they are and that they are 100x more beautiful than a victoria secret model.
There are no possible legitimate grounds for suppression of “What is a Woman?” by @MattWalshBlog. The movie contains no threats, no trick editing, and no hate speech — its satirical point is made using the statements of trans activists. If this can be suppressed, anything can.
Is the deluge of gay shit flooding out of every major corporation this month considered sensitive content that I can expect to have my delicate sensibilities shielded from? Or is it just just trannies that need to be protected from biological truth?
I expect the censorship to continue to lean left, as it always has.
Interesting aside, this same question that I posted in reply to Elon was marked as sensitive, hateful content by Twitter. Maybe calling pride month a “deluge of gay shit” was offensive to NAMBLA or something.
Looks like he's responding to pushback. He's going hard on red-pilling his 148 million twatter followers with a link to the movie and:
Every parent should watch this
and
Consenting adults should do whatever makes them happy, provided it does not harm others, but a child is not capable of consent, which is why we have laws protecting minors.
Anyone who trusted Elon and saw him as some saviour of ''free speech'' is a big, gullible, retard. Called it back when the acquisition happened (technically called this guy what he is years prior to the acquisition, back in the Jordan Peterstein & Shapiro internet days when Elon was starting to gain popularity), but no, he, he is ''one of us'', how dare I not trust our Lord Elon? Well there you have it. Who could have known that mr trillionaire is just another globalist faggot who doesn't care about you and used the lowest of the lowest hanging fruit to get under the skin of socially retarded IT nerds and other social outcasts. Oh wait, he's not a globalist, he is a... he wants to colonize Mars? He's an interplanetarist?
But who am I kidding? He will just post another low effort 2016 ''I'm one of you'' meme and the lot of the retards will just forget about this and continue to praise this idiot.
“I’m for free speech, unless they say a person with xy chromosomes is a man”
Shadowbanning... only people that follows you can see that "sensitive" content... you don't reach new people.
Same shit Youtube does with some youtubers.
Said it before, i don't trust this guy, it's a pussy.
In a way, it's worse than banning, and it happens on all social media in one way or another. They all have their thumbs heavily on the scale of "the algorithm". At least with outright banning, you can explain to normies "Look, this is banned". With shadow banning, it takes a few sentences to explain it, then a few more to explain how drastically it limits how many people will see it, at which point they've lost interest or decided you're a conspiracy theorist or whatever. The purpose of shadowbanning is to effectively ban speech while denying a simple, clear cut talking point to people who care about freedom of speech.
They even have a "Visibility Filter" graybox over the pinned Daily Wire free movie tweet so that you have to manually remove the censorship cover to see the movie preview details underneath.
And it also won't embed on those discord extensions due to that.
I thought he was gonna get out of the way on this shit and let his designated corporate troll make the decisions.
I hate to sound like I'm defending the guy and twitter again, but it's not shadow banning. Shadow banning would make your content not visible to anyone without you knowing. It's a related category of content moderation.
I do agree that it should be transparently marked and explained on the content if you've been artificially downranked, because otherwise it's too close to a shadow ban. I also don't agree with downranking for anything but trending pages, and certainly not for this movie.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse at this point, but he gave the game away months ago when he confirmed that saying trannies deserve to die isn't allowed.
Do you expect anything else from someone with such a massive amount of money?
Oh the duality of being both a globohomo puppet and the richest shitposter on earth. I know I've said it a million times on other accounts I have long forgotten the passwords to but it was fun while it lasted.
I'm sure your "sondaughter" is very pleased.
trannies are the ultimate class. they wont stop until you suck their lady dick or love that festering wound on their crotch. sing praises on how beautiful they are and that they are 100x more beautiful than a victoria secret model.
delusional mentally ill people tend to want their delusions to be validated more than anything.
Give 2023 a chance. I'm sure Lizzo is in line to become one
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1664432228045029377
He never unbanned innocent journalists outside of the US like Tommy Robinson.
I guess the European deep state demanded no free speech
Is the deluge of gay shit flooding out of every major corporation this month considered sensitive content that I can expect to have my delicate sensibilities shielded from? Or is it just just trannies that need to be protected from biological truth?
I expect the censorship to continue to lean left, as it always has.
Interesting aside, this same question that I posted in reply to Elon was marked as sensitive, hateful content by Twitter. Maybe calling pride month a “deluge of gay shit” was offensive to NAMBLA or something.
Archive link: https://archive.is/ozgut
So a shadowban then? All hail the new czar of speech!
He just said that those who will follow @DailyWire will see the content.
In other words, "freedom of speech, but no freedom of reach", something he said before.
That saying is fucking stupid
No excuses from people who turned an information distribution platform into TV. Fuck them.
Agree
Elly can afford to lose $42B, because Xi will gild him some gold pants with a special-access poo port.
Twitter will always suck. Gab elsewhere.
I think Tucker is going to regret using that platform to host his show
I don't
Looks like he's responding to pushback. He's going hard on red-pilling his 148 million twatter followers with a link to the movie and:
and
Anyone who trusted Elon and saw him as some saviour of ''free speech'' is a big, gullible, retard. Called it back when the acquisition happened (technically called this guy what he is years prior to the acquisition, back in the Jordan Peterstein & Shapiro internet days when Elon was starting to gain popularity), but no, he, he is ''one of us'', how dare I not trust our Lord Elon? Well there you have it. Who could have known that mr trillionaire is just another globalist faggot who doesn't care about you and used the lowest of the lowest hanging fruit to get under the skin of socially retarded IT nerds and other social outcasts. Oh wait, he's not a globalist, he is a... he wants to colonize Mars? He's an interplanetarist?
But who am I kidding? He will just post another low effort 2016 ''I'm one of you'' meme and the lot of the retards will just forget about this and continue to praise this idiot.
Except that he just retweeted it himself this morning: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1664609193230204929
except?
except what?
My post was 100% accurate & correct
Here is what you should have written:
Is everyone one of Elon's followers like Tom from MySpace?
What a bitch
Wait, you're telling me the guy who makes electric cars for a living is acting like a democrat? I am completely surprised by this :o