Mine is got to be Treat people like human being. Like what is that supposed to be? If it's about respect then I don't know who you are or what you do, why should I be respectful to you.
I treated people the way they deserved to be treated. If you are a senior or a veteran then I will treat you with respect, if you are a moron then I will treat you like a moron and frankly I treat everybody like a moron until proven otherwise.
Imagine being so worthless in life that simply being exist alone is some virtue, but that can be said about most leftist.
X rights are human rights.
It sounds great to the unprotected mind (x is part of the human race and they too deserve rights) but in fact is a complete lie.
Human rights are rights that apply to all humans so X rights are categorically not human rights as they apply only to X group and it is genuinely facepalm worthy everytime someone says that with a straight face
Doesn’t help that their “human rights” are nothing but privileges to act whenever they please.
Also doesn't help that most people don't really know what rights are, nor the rather important difference between positive and negative rights, and that the former is pretty fucking heinous when put under any sort of moral examination.
For those unaware, the most basic way to put it is that positive rights involve a person being entitled to the good or service of another, while a negative right is that others are obliged to inaction lest they infringe upon anothers rights.
Both examples of these exist within the American Constitution, though most are negative rights. Examples of a few clear cut negative rights are things like the First, Second and Fourth Amendments, while an example of a positive right is the Sixth Amendment, specifically the part about a Jury as that explicitly requires the service of another to achieve.
These distinctions are VERY important to anyone interested in the morality and preservation of human rights and freedoms, and the ignorance about it is how the left can so often and eagerly get away with calling for things like healthcare to be a human right, even though that outright claims that people are entitled to the labour of another person, and denial of that would be an infringement upon their human rights. Only problem is that's also fucking slavery, which is all that positive rights amount to at the end of the day.
This is also why so many statists assert that human rights are granted or bestowed upon people by governments and not innate to the human condition, because it allows them to assert that certain aspects of slavery is fine and okay when it serves their purposes.
I've long thought right to a jury trial (or any trial rally, even just a judge must be payed for by someone) is more of a weird mix imo. It's something that is provided to you as part of the process of you potentially being stripped of negative rights towhich you're otherwise entitled, because you are accused of stripping another of their negative rights (if it is a just law).
Even if it were a purely positive right, and I don't think it is, it's the only justifiable one.
The right to a jury is different: it means that if no one wants to serve as your juror the state has to let you go.
I do somewhat agree. It's definitely the one that I've idly thought about on a few occasions, and never really come up with a compelling or definitive conclusion in either direction.
This is the one for me. Especially when it comes to the trannies. "TRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS!" Ok, what rights are they missing? No, going into whatever bathroom you want, forcing people to call you whatever you want, and irrevocably mutilating confused children are not human rights.
only humans have rights.
My response to this is always "so there's no need to differentiate"
“I believe in science”
It’s not only dogmatic, but completely antithetical to the basis of science
I'm a good little boy, and I'm giving an appeal to authority!
Only true science is build off of logical fallacies and Divine Command Theory!
Experimentation is a form of blasphemy against The Science.
I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE!
Leftists are some of the worst misanthropes in the world. They are the greatest proponents of abortion, of impairing fertility and reproduction to reduce "overpopulation", of making everyone eat bugs, and of encouraging everyone to move to the cities to live in dirty, cramped conditions. If you ever hear another leftist telling you to "treat people like human beings" again, then just reply: "human beings are the worst people on Earth", and they will have no response for you.
The worst catchphrase for me would probably be "conspiracy theory". A sentence that makes everyone afraid of vocalizing how certain people push policies that benefit themselves against your interests, lest their peers think them mad. A term designed to keep people from ever looking up at what other people are doing, making them afraid of ever questioning it.
'It's current year!'
It's designed to say that all your arguments are in the past and settled and their arguments are in the present.
It's really stupid since it ignores experience, history which often gives examples of why we shouldn't do ANYTHING the leftists put as a policy
'Educate yourself!' Because it's the Dunning-Krugerest thing ever, where they smugly imply that their ignorant belief in propaganda makes them more knowledgeable or rational.
Oh, actually: 'It's not my job to educate you!' Because it's the above plus they're cowardly refusing to support the position they're demanding you accept.
But there are so many more. They're insufferable and loathsome.
In the middle of someone else's sentence: "AHEM, uh, DISRUPT" (proceeds to go on condescending rant about how her subject is more important)
Also, the old classic: "SOURCE? You have a SOURCE for that, like a written study? Sorry, common sense, reality, and physics don't count!"
My source is I made it the fuck up
IT CAME TO ME IN A DREAM
Gonna go with a classic which is
Which rarely has anything to do with reality, and everything to do with their overarching control of all sources of education and media.
Yeah it’s very easy for everything to have a “liberal bias” when anyone with an opposing point of view is prosecuted by the state, silenced and shadow banned by big tech and beaten with a bike lock by antifa
"Trans genocide"
"Literally killing trans people" is an argument for a policy, not against.
"Literally killing trans people" sounds like a good plan to me.
41% of them agree!
Oooh sweety, yikes, that's an oof from me. What are you, some kind of alt right insurectionist? I don't know who needs to hear this, but trans folks are folks, trans rights are human rights, because :clap: it's :clap: the :clap: year :clap: twenty :clap: twenty :clap: three. Let me repeat that for those in the back seats (who thanks to capitalism, had to be slaves and so couldn't get the seats they deserve): it's :clap: the :clap: year :clap: twenty :clap: twenty :clap: three., I suggest you educate yourself on that. And no you magatard, that doesn't mean 'do your own research', it means follow the science /thread
Ah, the classic follow-up to "It's not political, it's called being a decent human being!"
The screed of the Totalitarian.
"Nature is healing. We are the virus."
Evil. Evil. Evil. Anti-Human villainy.
Also within this Malthusian Death Cult mentality, includes Thanos did nothing wrong.
I would agree that the human race is a virus, it's just that we are not a very good one. Good viruses don't stick around in one host, we are meant spread far and wide.
The fundamental flaw of a leftist mindset is that in order to think like a leftist you have to stop thinking like a human.
Humanity is not a virus. It is an animal that is especially useful at modifying the environment for it's benefit (and those mutualist species within their ecosystem); and are a highly adaptable endurance predator.
I admit that the word virus is a strong word, the relationship between man and Earth is probably more akin to a commensalism relationship as our influences are very minimal, especially when compared to a virus.
I just want to make a point that these people hate their own kind so much that they mind as well be labeled non-human at this point.
You forgot "Broadband Internet" according to the British Labour Party
Currently? “This is the way.”
There's one I'd like to add to yours, OP. Except I was the one spouting it.
"Empathy is a core tenet of Social Justice"
Normally shoved in the face of a Leftist arguing that some evil, hateful, bigoted thing they just tried to rationalize conflicts with their aesthetic.
i hate how they treat the word "empathy" like it's a magic incantation that's supposed to instantly get you on side.
They don't know what these words mean. They treat "love" as "enabling", and "empathy" as "political acquiescence".
Empathy is reserved for fellow human beings, not filthy bigoted monsters like yourself.
This is precisely their attitude.
The reason you shouldn't get universal healthcare just because you're a "racist" human; is because you are not within their moral universe.
You are an enemy; and as such the friend-enemy distinction applies; and otherwise immoral things are not moral when done to you.
As Leftism is a Philosophy of War, it's ability to re-cast populations as enemies as soon as the tactical situation demands it; makes you a target for unlimited violence and horror which is a categorical moral imperative.
"The facts evolved"
OOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH that triggered the absolute fucking shit out of me. Sent me nearly into fucking space.
Back in 2016 I remember my college filled with signs like "There is no such thing as an Alternative Fact" or "Alternative Facts are Lies". This was from Trump's press secretary saying they had "alternative facts" about how many people attended the inauguration. Basically, they counted people getting off busses, where as the Left counted a population estimate.
But this was said by a fuckwit at TMZ when one of his co-hosts brought up the fact that there were serious issues with the lockdowns, masks, and the injection mandates.
Dude countered the point that all that shit was detrimental with "the facts evolved".
FACTS. DO. NOT. EVOLVE.
They are literally just trying to post-hoc rationalize why everything they said was an outright lie, and everything we were saying was 100% true.
In physics, people used to believe in this concept called "The Aether". It was established science. It was disproven in an experiment in the late 1800's. The Aether never existed. That is not the evolution of a fact. "The Aether exists" did not fucking eat a rare candy and evolve into "The Aether doesn't exist" like your fucking Charizard. What you discovered is that you were always fucking wrong before. The fact is that the Aether isn't real and you were wrong. It turns out "The Science TM was settled on being fucking wrong."
Other similar claims are like: "No one could have known at the time". "We didn't know".
BULLSHIT! WE FUCKING KNEW AND YOU TRIED TO HAVE US ARRESTED YOU FREAKS
Nope, YOU are 🖕
"We were moving at the speed of science."
BITCH, the Higgs-Boson particle took 40 years to prove. Science is intentionally fucking slow. That's what allows you to do testing.
YOU DIDN'T DO ANY FUCKING TESTING, AND CLAIMED YOU WERE FOLLOWING SCIENCE THAT NEVER FUCKING EXISTED IN THE FIRST PLACE
Fuck, these bastards got me mad again.
We're on the Right Side of History™.
"Read a history book."
"Love is love" Yeah, no. I know exactly what that fucking means....
"Love has no age limit!" 👀
What other than Slava Ukraine?
Indigenous.