Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

44
NBC News reporter unironically uses the phase "whorephobia" (archive.is)
posted 3 years ago by YesMovement 3 years ago by YesMovement +44 / -0
62 comments share
62 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (62)
sorted by:
▲ 28 ▼
– Ahaus667 28 points 3 years ago +28 / -0

if their body is going to be objectified no matter what, OnlyFans gives them the power and material reward. I know OnlyFans creators who love what they do and aren’t harming themselves or others

  1. Bold faced lie, these whores manipulate men emotionally so they get bigger tips because the simp actually think the painted whore cares about them. This is devastating to young men.

  2. No one “objectifies” you unless you present yourself as an object sweetheart. I didn’t force you to show off your tits.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

FUN FACT: The average OF girl makes $180/mo

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– NoGardE 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

And the median makes 0. Very few girls ever get a single subscriber.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

The true service will be done by some based hacker that dumps the entire list of OF hos. A whorelist for every man with self respect and finances to lose can refer to.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– NoGardE 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

They're not victims, they're morons who don't understand the pareto principle.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Hilarious if true. Butthole available on the internet forever for less than half a car payment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 26 ▼
– Kaarous 26 points 3 years ago +26 / -0

Unlikely. The failures far outnumber the successes, would be my guess.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TyCat999999 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Yeah, I’m guessing this is the case as well, like with any kind of business venture. Same as with Etsy, same with crypto bros, same with opening a restaurant or bar or whatever, same with those pyramid scene-type direct sales companies, most who play the game don’t make it. But I guess if you fell for Lularoe you’re just out some cash and have a garage full of dumb clothes. If you fail on OnlyFans you’ve got nudes out there forever.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 20 ▼
– Kaarous 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

No, it's unlikely that all of them are making top dollar. Or even one on twenty of them.

It's the same as YouTube. Less than a percent of content creators can actually make it work as a job, the rest are kidding themselves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– GiveThemNothing 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Bro!, You know I have your back when you are right, regardless of the down votes.

For that reason, I also have to call you on your bullshit when you are wrong.

$180/mo seems about right according to all public sources I can find.

Also, privately held companies still have to report revenue and payments to third parties.

If you have any sources with different numbers, post them in your reply.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– MattTheBlack 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

I used to do that and then it just got to the point where kept pissing me off with stupid claims

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

But these broken men have like 100 major professional porn stars to subscribe to, why would they pay $5/mo for some 5/10 nobody when you can get exclusives of your fav porn star who will even reply to your DMs- giving you a dopamine hit and illusion of a personal connection to your fav porn star?

Some women are getting very rich from this, most are not.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 4 ▼
– subbookkeeper 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Like any financial rewards system like this it will follow an exponential curve of rewards.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Angela White can make millions on OF, she's an established major porn star.

Mid Betty from your local Walmart, not so much.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vebent 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I’m actually in agreement with you on this one. To make $180 a month wouldn’t be worth continuing objectifying yourself and manipulating men. I believe they’re using OF for their main hussle. Actual prostitution. Meeting up with men for sex.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You're assuming they don't believe they can "build their brand" and keep trying. You're also ignoring the ego boost of having anyone pay money to talk to you and see your tits- even if it's not many, "it's more than other women who have zero!" and that has value to them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vebent 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Where the hell did I assume that? I said they’re using OF to build up their main hussle. It doesn’t mean that they’re not flashing their tits on the site.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– computadora 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Bold faced lie, these whores manipulate men emotionally so they get bigger tips because the simp actually think the painted whore cares about them. This is devastating to young men.

I highly recommend the show "Killer Cases" (on Hulu) s02e02 about Grant Amato.

This dude was such a simp it was basically a mental illness. He had it so bad for this Czech cam whore that he first stole tons of money from his family ($200k) to pay her with. Then, when they demanded he cut her off and kicked him out of the house, he killed them all, including his brother that he was very close with. All so he could keep talking to and giving money to this cam whore who didn't give a fuck about him. Disgusting excuse of a man, but fascinating case.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Ahaus667 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

I’m sure the whore suffered no consequences for constantly enabling and pushing for more money

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– computadora 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Surely not. They didn't even bother talking to her for the murder trial.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Adamrises 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

They never do.

The only time I've ever heard someone argue "well, they can't be held responsible for what someone else chooses to do" is when women do it to men. Even in cases where she outright bullies him to kill himself openly and directly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Assassin47 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

No, nobody here doubts that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 16 ▼
– SomeRando 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

This phobia, that phobia - it's starting to sound like a suffix appended to a lot of things we should reasonably dislike

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

In the 1980s, "doctors" who wanted to push opiates on patients and get paid by the pharmaceutical industry for it, started claiming that traditional wariness of opium was "opiophobia".

Millions of addicts and hundreds of thousands of deaths later, the exact same tactic is still used to manipulate idiots.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– realerfunction 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

why shouldn't i be repulsed by a whore?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– raptor_jesus 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

You should be feeling revulsion. However a phobia is explicitly unfounded. Whorephobia cannot exist according to its own definition. Unless you just have a keenly honed sixth sense for detecting whores despite no outwardly whorish tendencies being displayed where you can see. If you can just sense whores then maybe you can argue it's a phobia.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

broken men

Ironic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Journalists dislike 'whorephobia' for a very good reason - it's a direct attack on their profession.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

In case you're wondering the source for that pic of Rachel Gilmore in a lingerie top- it's when Gilly tried to attack Jordan Peterson and defend Mr Dylan getting a makup sponsorship by admitting she takes her makeup advice from "trans women" ie men pathetically attempting to look like women: https://archive.is/swWYx

As a cis woman who knows a lot about makeup I have learned so much from trans makeup girlies!!! 💖✨Transphobia is ugly, and so is gatekeeping. If you can fix your hairline, Jordan, trans women should be able to see themselves in companies that make them feel beautiful too!

She willfully admitted that she takes makeup advice from mentally ill men...of her own free will. Wasn't exposed, wasn't pressured to say that...like she literally thought that was an excellent thing to admit to the world.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Why do you have a soft spot for trannies

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MattTheBlack 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Peterson is unironically what Imp claims he is. The dude is soft asf and thinks that men should bow to modern women in an attempt to "save" them. Trannies still aren't shit though

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Erithal 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Drowning people are quite likely to pull others down with them.

You'd do well to remember this when trying to save someone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Erithal 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

the literal enemy [women]

Only for you. Your monomania warps your sense of who's worth saving. You are definitionally alienated and divorced from a normal human reproductive cycle by your choice of enemy.

You never even consider rescuing children from women, and jump straight to the poor trannies-- 'men' and 'brothers' in chromosome only. Those who (ironically) self-identify and ape the women you hate.

I'd rather take a chance trying to save broken men and waste time, than side with women and "win" yet more entrenchment of their superiority complex.

It is easier to raise strong children than fix broken men, per Douglass. In that sense your 'enemies' make better allies than you, since they can have children, who are definitionally easier to 'rescue' than your broken 'men' who no longer even identify as male.

I've yet to hear a real argument for attacking them as people that isn't women's traditional "small percentage are evil so we should hate them all" garbage, purely motivated by simping or entirely spiteful.

You cannot rescue someone from their delusions. Someone has to want to change, and MtFs desire for change is entirely dysphoric and aligned against you. You will never succeed while society reinforces their delusions.

Rather than focusing on children, who both need and desire role models and guidance, your fixation on 'saving' MtF trannies is peak 'captain save a hoe' energy-- except the 'women' you simp for are male.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

So trannies don't have accountability but all women do?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– TerpenoidTester 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

If you don’t have an OnlyFans, they’ll make a fake to use against you.

So...it is a bad thing?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

"Onlyfans is awesome & empowering, but it's terrible if someone makes a joke about you having one!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Adamrises 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Its like that recent Idubbz drama.

His wife having an Onlyfans is awesome and empowering and him being the laughing stock of the internet is totally worth supporting her on. But if you joke "I'll subscribe to it if I lose a fight" then you are an evil man who they ban from their events.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Wait I thought that was just the rational weariness around STDs and gold diggers

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy