65 years ago - Time Magazine last reported the truth.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
Link checks out :
https://archive.vn/pBNnk
13/50 just never seems to go away, does it?
It's the triple copy of the warrior gene.
What I find surprising is that in 1958 it was 10/60 which is a lot worse. People including myself often glorify an idea of older, pre-gangsta rap black culture. I still feel there's no way it could have been worse in the 50's.
I think police were just so much more effective back then, that even with 3% less black people (we know the pop numbers are lies but w/e) and likely less crime happening in total, they completed a higher rate of arrests. At the time police were socio-culturally healthy, in-tact, willing and empowered white men, with roots and personal investments in the places they policed, subordinate to other white men who felt the same way in a big white caring chain that only soured past redemption when it got into big money.
13/50 is murder.
The 10/60 cited here is all violent crime, even the mere threat of it.
Regardless, the disproportionality of it is indeed staggering.
Oh I thought 13/50 was violent crime. Carry on then lol.
Wait til you look up the rape ratios. Since it's almost exclusively men, it's like 6.5/84. It's bad. Really bad.
The everything was totally great some other time some other place myth is a myth.
It's used and repeated by classical liberals to ease their mental dissonance.
Let's say you're a Jordan Peterson / Steven Pinker / Douglas Murray.
The difference between these types and the zombies is that they retain some autonomy. But they still play by all the rules.
So they have the ability to notice some things. Surely there must be a Rational explanation for these hate facts and statistics.
But they must also follow The Science, which is telling them that "this has absolutely nothing to do with biology, and also biology doesn't exist, neither does evolution, not when it comes to humans, don't think too much about this, just no biology, that's it, now be distracted, go away, we're all just totally exactly the same, and the only thing that separates us is how much we've been oppressed, The Science has spoken".
How to resolve this seeming conflict?
Oh I know, they think, it's all because of the government! When the government wasn't giving out any welfare, everyone was totally just great! Just don't go reading no old timey news papers or look up no outdated statistics!
This is pre Johnson. 1351 is not a recent phenomena.
How do the percentages (% of population, % arrest, and % violent crime) look today?
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222: In 2019, Negros made up 13.6% of the population. Whites 75.8%
Via RayEpps.com https://archive.is/2ck82
From the charts, white vs black % of arrests:
Rape: 69.8 / 26.7
Robbery: 44.7 vs 52.7
Aggravated assault: 61.8 vs 33.2
Arson (Violent crime): 59.1 vs 36.4
Other assaults: 64.8 v 31.2
Sex offenses (except rape and prostitution): 74.6 vs 20.6
Not a single crime where there's at or below % of pop but the only ones where's it's close (14-15%) are Driving under the influence, Liquor laws & Drunkenness. For under 18 they get below 13% for those same 3 but that's probably due to legal drinking age being 21.
The only time whites get about % of pop is Driving under the influence (81.5), Liquor laws (77.7%) & Suspicion (76.6). We're close on Sex offenses (except rape and prostitution) at 74.6%. There's only 7 crimes whites are above 70%.
Hehehehe.
So comparing the past older shown percentages vs the modern contemporary ones results in a slight uptick of the black population (3%), and a slight downtick (3%) for arrests and slightly bigger downtick (ca 10%) for violent crime. It's going in the right direction, but it's awfully slow, and still strangely, similarly, comparative.
I trust these statistics as much as I can physically grasp and toss them into a trash bin.
Yeah, a lot of it is going to be vastly underreported, because noone's going to catch a nigga publicly drunk in a ghetto if the cops only ever go there to bag bodies, and noone's reporting niggas cleaning up drug stores and pharmacies in places like San Francisco where the cops just don't bother anymore because of politicians. If it's not even recorded, it won't show up in stats.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The more things change...
"Arrests" don't mean shit, especially during segregation. What about convictions?
I dunno why you got downvoted for saying this. I guess if arrest statistics are what you have you make do. It would be easy to assign too much weight to that data.
Disarm anyone raised solely by women, and make anyone raised solely by women count as a woman in crime statistics.
You watch how much the evil fucks will squirm. Race war makes their lives too easy. If they stopped beating little kids, there wouldn't be high crime rates.
You’re a straight-up forum slider at this point. It’s tiresome.
Right, the person posting articles from 70 years ago about "muh negros" is definitely contributing something useful...
Said nobody except ConPro imports.
The real reason for high black crime rates is because the women beat the fuck out of them as kids.
Ok at this point I’m thinking there has to be a team behind the Imp account. No one man can be this fucking autistic.
I think he genuinely is. His tone and tales are too consistent to be anything other than an actual person. It isn't a team, it's just a horrifying phenomenon of a person.
So, just to be clear...your claim is that black women are more violent and abusive than non-black women so...women are at fault, and race doesn't matter? Even though the only factor that changes in your own argument seems to be race?
Black families are more likely to be just the woman. That's the difference.
It's okay to lose the battle, Imp. You are obviously not cracking this consensus... don't you feel even a little embarrassed in the attempt with what is clearly a personal narrative? Not echoed, reflected, reciprocated by any other users, and yet there you are bold-facedly pretending it's a group consensus.
You're obviously focused on manipulating men. It seems to be to the exclusion of targeting any woman in practice.
You sit and bullshit men all day. Have you ever considered this? That in practice, men are your target? That there's something you hate and want to change about men? That if you hated women more and wanted to change women more, you wouldn't be crying about how a bunch of MEN feel about FBI statistics?
It's observable that you care more about convincing men to "switch" the object of their hate to women than you care about anything any single woman ever did. You aren't even complaining about women, you are applying top tier racist coalburner logic to all children with no dads, without expressing any information other than hate, and with no visible aim other than aforementioned narrative game bullshit.
I'm not going to take any criticism from someone who posts on ConPro. You people are the definition of shills.
Also, I used to get highly upvoted. Your worthless cult scared all the sane people off. Even C admitted that growth of this site plateaued after your type showed up.
Bro everyone is just tired of you because you haven't posted anything new in years. Take the fucking L and learn from it, Jesus...
Just like someone else said, people just got tired of your endless repetition. Upvotes aren't always agreement, it's just if they find things interesting. You just keep repeating and repeating, and that's no longer interesting. It's not some outside force of saboteurs downvoting you, it's people who used to upvote or ignore you getting sick of your singlemindedness and blindness to any nuance.
Doesn't even mean people hate you, for the record...just that they're tired of your posting style.
You're constantly trying to derail threads with your male genocide, all women are monsters, trannies are great, racism isn't real, and Nazis are out to get you takes. And that gets old real freaking fast.
While women are shutting you out of work, keep crying about Jews. That's not what controlled opposition does at all.
Not only that, but more likely to be raised by two married parents than White kids today.
It's almost like there's a genetic component or something. Maybe genetic impacts don't end at the neck?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
>men abandon their families
Did you mean to post that on your alt? It's rather suspicious that you showed up so soon after I said it was you.
u/TheDon47
What the fuck are you on about now you mush brained faggot?
His response to things he can’t argue against is “You’re just a stormcuck/undercover TERF/alt of person I’m arguing with, so I’m not going to address your point”, because he doesn’t have the capacity to understand how retarded he acts.
Edit: it is easier for him to believe that everyone who disagrees with him is an enemy agent rather than him being wrong.
And what’s hilariously ironic about that fact is he is physically incapable of realizing what he’s doing is identical to what he projects “mUh sToRmcUCkS” as doing. When I first got here I thought he was some performance artist trying to poison the well by writing rants, then switching every use of the word “jew” to “woman”
It helps when the ideology you prominently oppose openly advocates for infiltration to silence those who oppose it. You know, when you write shit down, it's very difficult to pretend you didn't say it.
Don't worry, I'm your alt too.
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16an5XA2eO/the-liberal-white-woman-is-the-m/c/4TsacUM7KWw
Literally a minute after I said that account was you, the real you showed up. A little suspicious, don't you think?
You make Enola Holmes seem like a good detective lmfao
Don't know who that is.
Here’s white liberal women :
https://twitter.com/hodgetwins/status/1648652041122709507?s=46