Anything but glowing praise is “endangering”. I don’t have Netflix anymore but I’m so sick of this mindset. Along the lines of women who feel “violated” because an ugly guy asks them on a date
Same thing happens when you don’t aggressively and enthusiastically affirm transgenderism. You are “harming” trans people. You are committing “violence”. It’s just performative hysteria intended to gin up mindless support among the credulous normies.
Its not enough to be not racist, you gotta be anti racist. Its similar to.. its not enough to hate jews, you gotta punch one in the face or report one to the local nazi SS. Making you be more extreme and using actual violence. Everyone should just mind their damn business and keep shit to yourself. But these days people gotta do dumb shit to get attention online or virtue signal.
Redefinition is everything. Either you possess the institutional power to enforce your preferred definitions, or you are subject to those who wield such power against you.
Look at “white supremacy”. 99% of the time, the term is used to describe any behavior that isn’t actively destroying white peoples, cultures, and nations. The only thing that isn’t “white supremacy” is white extinction. But we don’t control the definitions right now, so the language is warped to the point where it becomes an actual existential threat to whites.
Eh not just glowing praise, with Jews you have to lie for them and lie about them. If I say accurately that they own the media and honestly that a man is a man/woman is woman, that's anti-semitic.
Check out the 1991 Crown Heights Riots. Hard to find actual information about them nowadays, most of what you read is bullshit fanfiction of the events, so you have to dig around for it.
Trying to pretend none of that existed is hilarious, and seeing black filmmakers make Jews straight up stereotypes is going to elicit a response for sure.
I'm watching both groups get a little taste of their own medicine for crying censorship and now it is hitting them....oh the irony.
Oh I've never heard them talk about how they would handle property within the country they want. Just hear them talk about wanting their own country like some white people do, except they want it to be in the South.
Well, property would be handled the way that Socialists handle property, and a whole slew of the Black Nationalist movement originates from efforts to foment a black-racialist-socialist state in the Southern US.
None of that is really different than any amount of National Socialist framework, there's just no Germania that's smaller than Germany under German National Socialism.
The Black Nationalists I've met are devout Muslims though. Maybe not the only kind. NatSoc have a complicated relationship with religion, but it's not a religious state. Whereas I feel like the Muslims would give it primacy in their state.
Are they actual Muslims, or NOI followers. Devout Muslims, sure, that's a whole different thing.
Nation Of Islam? None of them are Muslims and would be executed as heretics in a Muslim country. The NOI is a cult espousing a black version of "Aryanism" that the NatSoc's worshiped and institutionalized.
One thing that disgusts me about it is how transparently absurd the logic for protecting Jews in particular is—it goes: “it’s particularly bad when this happens to Jews because they’ve historically been the victim of that stereotype,” and then, if you ask why a stereotype of being successful and powerful is considered offensive, the logic continues with: “ascribing Jews power and influence has historically been an early step in them being singled out and persecuted for that perceived power and influence, and this has happened many times.”
Now, there’s not anything strictly wrong with that logic (setting aside questions of whether the stereotype is accurate or not as not directly relevant to the logic itself )… but it does compel one to go back to the start of the logic and raise the question of “if this stereotype is part of a repeating pattern that leads to violence, why is it not deeply concerning to see whites painted with that stereotype?”
They don't even attempt to hide it. They've talked about the Kalergi plan openly for over 100 years. It's just not reported in the mainstream media or allowed to be talked about on mainstream social media platforms, that they control, that normies consume.
So Jewish stereotypes go both ways. Smart (well educated lest we argue about IQ) but deceptive. Rich but greedy. It's all true, so just call 'em like you see 'em.
"The Jewish family are positioned as white, privileged, and racist. The Black family just has a stern dad. At the end there’s much Jewish apologising for racism. None for antisemitism. That word never appears,” wrote comedian and “Jews Don’t Count,” author David Baddiel.
"A wedge between the black and the jew community". I hope so. It'd be so funny watching these satanic sorcerers find out they can't control their pet apes anymore lmao.
I watched this last night (got outvoted 2-1) and the first hour was just cringe. It actually got funny in the last 20 minutes. But yeah some of the Jews did not come off well. Jonah Hill's character even distances himself from jews - says he eats bacon (and he's covered with Tatt's, which from what I've read means he can't be buried in a jewish cemetery)
First: white jews exist whether white nationalists or zionists like it or not. A bronze age society rationalized incorrectly about genetics, and so jews have been interbreeding with Europeans for centuries, and as such are almost entirely an admixture as it is. Worse, the idea of a jewish racial nation is progressive nonsense, and the jews are entirely defined by their religion. Which means all those non-practicing white "jews"... are just white people.
Second: this story isn't even sort of new. Blacks and jews not getting along because jewish were being demographically replaced isn't new. A lot of "white flight" that people talk about ended up typically being a lot more "jewish flight" than anything else, as jews were ... wait for it... demographically replaced from their own communities thanks to the Leftists they voted for.
I specifically said that the Alt-Right was using him as a suicide bomber to destroy populism. I stand by that sentiment, especially when you all were trying to defend both him and Milo; which only the sensible one of you pointed out that Milo was a fucking Zionist, Kanye was a fucking BLM supporter, and there was a high likelihood of this whole thing was a fed gay-op. It's still a struggle to get you to admit that Fuentes is a cat-boi loving degenerate grifter, but you're too blinded by ideology to see the obvious.
It's why I see so many of you as nothing short of controlled opposition: you don't give a shit if you kill the whole populist movement. So long as you get Schadenfreude, you'll take every single defeat you can, and drag every other crab to the bottom of the bucket with you.
The religion is what creates the ethnicity. Without religious doctrines, jews have no culture, no language, no tradition, no history, and not even a genetic ingroup. They are explicitly a religion.
As for genetic testing, there is no genetic test for jewish lineage, because that's not how the Right Of Return works in the first place. The Israelis have been arguing about that test for decades specifically because if you go by genetic standards, most European and damn near all American Jews wouldn't count because they fundamentally aren't semetic. Jews are a religion, Semites are an actual demographic.
That's why the Leftist American and European jews have been doing everything in their power to specify that the Right Of Return doesn't include genetic testing, or even basic-bitch religious conversion standards. Genetic testing doesn't mean anything, when the Right Of Return is "pluralist" and Leftist jews do Leftist shit: like re-define the definition of "jew" to be entirely irreligious, or claim that "rabbi" doesn't need approval or certification.
Not only are tons of jews white. If they pushed for genetic testing, they wouldn't be considered genetically jewish by your own standards.
Just the facts ok: All groups of Jews have a genetic thread between them and are identifiable. Sure, Ashkenazi are different from Mizrahi. There are different tribes. You can tell them apart, and you can tell all of them from non-Jews. Ashkenazi would only not qualify for Right of Return if Israel chose to disqualify them, which since they are a foundational population of Israel would be ridiculous.
I've seen the genetic lineage maps wielded it at Dr. Jester, and he was correct in pointing out that, yeah, those maps indicate that the variation among semites is wide enough to cross larger genetic strata. Different semetic peoples are more closely related to the populations that they live next to, than other semetic peoples.
This is the whole point. You can't tell them apart from non-jews, and it's one of the reasons the Nazis had to invent branding for them. Especially when we're talking about progressive racial fractioning, like "1/8th jew".
Again, the whole fight between American jews and Israeli jews is over the fact that if the Israelis had thier way, the American jews were simply not jewish enough to return to Israel and they fucking knew it, that's why they've been fighting the Orthodox and Conservative factions in the Israeli government for decades over it.
You can say that "oh they would all qualify", but the jews themselves have known for decades that they simply wouldn't. That book ("Jew Versus Jew") goes on (and on and on and on and on for hundreds of pages) about that infighting taking place all over the US and Israel over that very specific issue.
I've seen gene maps, too, in which it looked to me like Jews were well-clustered enough to be identified as a group. That means that there could be samples outside the area you identify as Jewish, so could it be used to do a Jew or Not Jew test, I don't know. DNA wasn't available to the Nazis, was it? So their inability to precisely identify Jews is understandable.
I actually don't understand what you're saying about semitic people, without seeing the data.
I also don't understand what you're saying about American Jews being not Jewish enough. Is this a matter of dilution?
Anything but glowing praise is “endangering”. I don’t have Netflix anymore but I’m so sick of this mindset. Along the lines of women who feel “violated” because an ugly guy asks them on a date
Same thing happens when you don’t aggressively and enthusiastically affirm transgenderism. You are “harming” trans people. You are committing “violence”. It’s just performative hysteria intended to gin up mindless support among the credulous normies.
Just think not that long ago saying that men don’t get pregnant or that men are not women would’ve been met with “of course”
Its not enough to be not racist, you gotta be anti racist. Its similar to.. its not enough to hate jews, you gotta punch one in the face or report one to the local nazi SS. Making you be more extreme and using actual violence. Everyone should just mind their damn business and keep shit to yourself. But these days people gotta do dumb shit to get attention online or virtue signal.
Redefinition is everything. Either you possess the institutional power to enforce your preferred definitions, or you are subject to those who wield such power against you.
Look at “white supremacy”. 99% of the time, the term is used to describe any behavior that isn’t actively destroying white peoples, cultures, and nations. The only thing that isn’t “white supremacy” is white extinction. But we don’t control the definitions right now, so the language is warped to the point where it becomes an actual existential threat to whites.
Eh not just glowing praise, with Jews you have to lie for them and lie about them. If I say accurately that they own the media and honestly that a man is a man/woman is woman, that's anti-semitic.
White when it suits them, non-White when it doesn't
White while they run up the bill, Jewish when the check finally comes.
On the one hand, Jews are masters of redefining any criticism of Jews as somehow “endangering Jewish lives”.
On the other hand, if blacks are mad at you for any reason, your lives probably are in danger.
Heh.
Want to know about Black / Jewish relations?
Check out the 1991 Crown Heights Riots. Hard to find actual information about them nowadays, most of what you read is bullshit fanfiction of the events, so you have to dig around for it.
Trying to pretend none of that existed is hilarious, and seeing black filmmakers make Jews straight up stereotypes is going to elicit a response for sure.
I'm watching both groups get a little taste of their own medicine for crying censorship and now it is hitting them....oh the irony.
Why go back to 1991? I can literally watch Black National Socialists attacking and harassing jews through all of the 2020 race riots.
Is National Socialism really the banner they're gathered under, or is that a property you're applying to them?
It's the property I'm applying, because it's what they are espousing, they just really don't want to say it too loudly.
Oh I've never heard them talk about how they would handle property within the country they want. Just hear them talk about wanting their own country like some white people do, except they want it to be in the South.
Well, property would be handled the way that Socialists handle property, and a whole slew of the Black Nationalist movement originates from efforts to foment a black-racialist-socialist state in the Southern US.
None of that is really different than any amount of National Socialist framework, there's just no Germania that's smaller than Germany under German National Socialism.
The Black Nationalists I've met are devout Muslims though. Maybe not the only kind. NatSoc have a complicated relationship with religion, but it's not a religious state. Whereas I feel like the Muslims would give it primacy in their state.
Are they actual Muslims, or NOI followers. Devout Muslims, sure, that's a whole different thing.
Nation Of Islam? None of them are Muslims and would be executed as heretics in a Muslim country. The NOI is a cult espousing a black version of "Aryanism" that the NatSoc's worshiped and institutionalized.
If it's a painful stereotype to paint Jews as rich and privileged, maybe that should also not be done to other groups.
The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you?
Yes
I steered clear from blaming any group for this, and I especially steer clear from Goebbels quotes.
One thing that disgusts me about it is how transparently absurd the logic for protecting Jews in particular is—it goes: “it’s particularly bad when this happens to Jews because they’ve historically been the victim of that stereotype,” and then, if you ask why a stereotype of being successful and powerful is considered offensive, the logic continues with: “ascribing Jews power and influence has historically been an early step in them being singled out and persecuted for that perceived power and influence, and this has happened many times.”
Now, there’s not anything strictly wrong with that logic (setting aside questions of whether the stereotype is accurate or not as not directly relevant to the logic itself )… but it does compel one to go back to the start of the logic and raise the question of “if this stereotype is part of a repeating pattern that leads to violence, why is it not deeply concerning to see whites painted with that stereotype?”
Which leads, inevitably, to "we want to see the white race destroyed".
They don't even attempt to hide it. They've talked about the Kalergi plan openly for over 100 years. It's just not reported in the mainstream media or allowed to be talked about on mainstream social media platforms, that they control, that normies consume.
Don't call Jews successful and privileged, it has led to persecution and genocide.
In other news, whites are very successful due to no merit of their own, and they are also very privileged.
So Jewish stereotypes go both ways. Smart (well educated lest we argue about IQ) but deceptive. Rich but greedy. It's all true, so just call 'em like you see 'em.
The golem turns against it's master.
Why would a wedge between those two groups endanger one side? What is that author trying to say?
“We wuz da reel Nazis!”
There's a reason there's a whole fucking slew of Black National Socialists screaming about Hitler being right in the past couple years.
Here's Mr.Baddiel in blackface with a pineapple on his head and fake dreads
It’s obviously fiction if there’s a black dad
Someone should slap him in the face for this much hypocrisy
To be fair, what isn't endangering Jews, according to most Jews?
To answer honestly, they like it when you're cowed. Act like you just want to do your job and keep your head down, and they love you.
Black people look at jews and are like: "You white"
Jews look at black people and are like: "WE MADE YOUUUU, HOOWWW DAAARE YOU TURN AGAINST USSSS!!?!?!?!?!"
Meanwhile, I thought there was some joke about encouraging interracial coupling between blacks and jews that got called antisemitic.
"A wedge between the black and the jew community". I hope so. It'd be so funny watching these satanic sorcerers find out they can't control their pet apes anymore lmao.
Seems accurate. The truth about jews usually is “horribly damaging “.
I think the sexual abuse and humiliation Jewish media types have subjected black entertainers to already damaged that relationship lmao
I watched this last night (got outvoted 2-1) and the first hour was just cringe. It actually got funny in the last 20 minutes. But yeah some of the Jews did not come off well. Jonah Hill's character even distances himself from jews - says he eats bacon (and he's covered with Tatt's, which from what I've read means he can't be buried in a jewish cemetery)
The tattoo thing is a myth outside of the ultra-orthodox.
Didn't...didn't jews both make and star in this? Are they stiffling jewish voices? What about representation?
lol
nitter link https://nitter.pussthecat.org/WillemD19118035/status/1621705662404366339
archive of linked page https://archive.is/tPOAp
Cry about it, Leftists.
First: white jews exist whether white nationalists or zionists like it or not. A bronze age society rationalized incorrectly about genetics, and so jews have been interbreeding with Europeans for centuries, and as such are almost entirely an admixture as it is. Worse, the idea of a jewish racial nation is progressive nonsense, and the jews are entirely defined by their religion. Which means all those non-practicing white "jews"... are just white people.
Second: this story isn't even sort of new. Blacks and jews not getting along because jewish were being demographically replaced isn't new. A lot of "white flight" that people talk about ended up typically being a lot more "jewish flight" than anything else, as jews were ... wait for it... demographically replaced from their own communities thanks to the Leftists they voted for.
Remember when the Jews flexed on Kanye and Kyrie, and then you and Antonio disappeared for like two weeks lol
No, because I was here the entire time.
I specifically said that the Alt-Right was using him as a suicide bomber to destroy populism. I stand by that sentiment, especially when you all were trying to defend both him and Milo; which only the sensible one of you pointed out that Milo was a fucking Zionist, Kanye was a fucking BLM supporter, and there was a high likelihood of this whole thing was a fed gay-op. It's still a struggle to get you to admit that Fuentes is a cat-boi loving degenerate grifter, but you're too blinded by ideology to see the obvious.
It's why I see so many of you as nothing short of controlled opposition: you don't give a shit if you kill the whole populist movement. So long as you get Schadenfreude, you'll take every single defeat you can, and drag every other crab to the bottom of the bucket with you.
So true even the nick Fuentes visit hurt Trump very bad in the eyes of older conservatives.
I'm not old but Fuentes is a fucktard and was purposefully running an op against Trump
no.
There are white muslims, there are white buddhists, there are white jews.
jew is both an ethnicity and an religion. Don't be disingenuous.
The israelis have a dna test that a prospective citizen needs to pass to gain entry. Jewishness is literally genetic.
The religion is what creates the ethnicity. Without religious doctrines, jews have no culture, no language, no tradition, no history, and not even a genetic ingroup. They are explicitly a religion.
As for genetic testing, there is no genetic test for jewish lineage, because that's not how the Right Of Return works in the first place. The Israelis have been arguing about that test for decades specifically because if you go by genetic standards, most European and damn near all American Jews wouldn't count because they fundamentally aren't semetic. Jews are a religion, Semites are an actual demographic.
That's why the Leftist American and European jews have been doing everything in their power to specify that the Right Of Return doesn't include genetic testing, or even basic-bitch religious conversion standards. Genetic testing doesn't mean anything, when the Right Of Return is "pluralist" and Leftist jews do Leftist shit: like re-define the definition of "jew" to be entirely irreligious, or claim that "rabbi" doesn't need approval or certification.
Not only are tons of jews white. If they pushed for genetic testing, they wouldn't be considered genetically jewish by your own standards.
Just the facts ok: All groups of Jews have a genetic thread between them and are identifiable. Sure, Ashkenazi are different from Mizrahi. There are different tribes. You can tell them apart, and you can tell all of them from non-Jews. Ashkenazi would only not qualify for Right of Return if Israel chose to disqualify them, which since they are a foundational population of Israel would be ridiculous.
I've seen the genetic lineage maps wielded it at Dr. Jester, and he was correct in pointing out that, yeah, those maps indicate that the variation among semites is wide enough to cross larger genetic strata. Different semetic peoples are more closely related to the populations that they live next to, than other semetic peoples.
This is the whole point. You can't tell them apart from non-jews, and it's one of the reasons the Nazis had to invent branding for them. Especially when we're talking about progressive racial fractioning, like "1/8th jew".
Again, the whole fight between American jews and Israeli jews is over the fact that if the Israelis had thier way, the American jews were simply not jewish enough to return to Israel and they fucking knew it, that's why they've been fighting the Orthodox and Conservative factions in the Israeli government for decades over it.
You can say that "oh they would all qualify", but the jews themselves have known for decades that they simply wouldn't. That book ("Jew Versus Jew") goes on (and on and on and on and on for hundreds of pages) about that infighting taking place all over the US and Israel over that very specific issue.
I've seen gene maps, too, in which it looked to me like Jews were well-clustered enough to be identified as a group. That means that there could be samples outside the area you identify as Jewish, so could it be used to do a Jew or Not Jew test, I don't know. DNA wasn't available to the Nazis, was it? So their inability to precisely identify Jews is understandable.
I actually don't understand what you're saying about semitic people, without seeing the data.
I also don't understand what you're saying about American Jews being not Jewish enough. Is this a matter of dilution?