Reality?
(media.communities.win)
Comments (50)
sorted by:
If I was actually good at coding and stuff, what I'd try to do is put a naked filter on google glasses. Basically, when you looked at a woman, you could engage the "remove all her clothes" feature, which then would use top of the line AI/CGI/3DArt/Whatever technology to impose the computer's best guess of what her naked body looks like so the entire time you're looking at her through google glasses she appears naked to you.
So yes, reality.
I already have a pair of those glasses, ordered from the back of a mid seventies MAD magazine
MAD Magazine didn't run advertising for anything but MAD books and back issues until the 2000s. Myth busted, methinks.
I'm sure you know the ads I mean (if you're old enough)
I'm posting on the internet after midnight on a weekday, I definitely remember old 70s comic book ads.
I have no idea what comic they were in. but they were in lots of comics
I bought a pair of glasses in a weird shop and now I keep seeing black people everywhere!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFjaETj_g9w
They made sure to block that quickly. There's a lot of use for human measurements using hololense and Kinect, but it would mean nude codes, so we don't get them.
They blocked that? No wonder it was a flop for consumers. If they led with that, they'd have sold out... until the gynocratic government eventually banned it.
you don't get it, not getting the ability to see random women on the street naked through my glasses is a feminist plot!
That just gave me a great idea too. You can literally program it to make ugly women disappear. Unless the woman is close to your proximity such that you'll potentially run into her, so you have to see her. You could program the google glasses to just project the proper backgrounds and objects around ugly women so that you wouldn't even notice their existence.
In Black Mirror that's why people you've blocked only show up as blurry blobs. So if you see a perfect sphere bouncing down the sidewalk you know it's a fatty.
There's a lot of women out there these days that you wouldn't want to see naked. It's a blessing in disguise.
I think thats what happened. Many a person was fear mongering the chance of lecherous men.
Remember the uproar over the makeup remover apps!
I remember the race swapping feature which was cool as hell, but of course that got taken away as well.
Man, you really are a loser obsessed with sex. In the past few days your contributions here have included (paraphrasing):
But I won't dent it. The only thing I enjoy doing in life is having sex with hot women. You're correct, I haven't done that in a while (since last June). I am going to Thailand in March though where I'll get plenty. I actually don't find enjoyment in anything else in life. All I enjoy doing is fucking attractive women.
Then why Thailand? Go to the Philippines.
If you do what you like, you'll like what you do...
The guys on 4chan can already do that from a picture of a woman and their autism. All you'd be doing is streamlining that to shorten the time until it was "real time."
Exactly. The technology is there to do it.
It wouldn't be THAT hard.
Make one by 1) capturing the outline and skin-tone, 2) applying a small elision to the outermost outline, 3) redoubling a ribbon of the background towards the normal of the outline's surface, 4) noting sexed characteristics and positions using a convolution against grayscale examples, 5) correcting all colors within the outline to the noted skin-tone, 6) adding stereotypical creases and anatomical texture according to sex, 7) noting any rainbow in the clothing and writing GAY across that person's face.
Et Voilà.
The second panel could use some work because it's so ambiguous that they needed to add that parenthetical. The middle guy just looks like he's buckled over laughing at something funny.
But yes.
I guess they didn't want to draw dicks out
RIP Harambe :(
that was an actual real tragedy
Huxley was more right than Orwell. That's established now.
They were both instruction manuals.
I'll take the one with drugs - if we have a choice
It's a question of if you want your mind enslaved or your body (although I guess in either case you get both eventually).
Somewhere between both panels is more realistic.
Yes, some losers will use the tech to watch porn all day. It's not much different from some losers using current tech to watch porn all day while others actually use it for something productive.
I don't trust companies to do what's best for people that get swept up into it, but I'm a big fan of personal responsibility and judging technology based on the worst possible application of it is just silly.
The porn industry is one of if not the largest industry in the world, so they will be very glad to have that usage (also those in power will not fight it as it keeps the masses occupied and lazy slobs).
Have you tried AR on your phone?
No one is using Google glasses for anything
So I’m not getting that smart-linked Ruger Super Warhawk Shadowrun promised me?
Isn't that a pro apple comic? How will he respond to the apple AR glasses?
Apple will probably team up with Rayban or Gucci and make the glasses look more fashionable than nerdy. So he'll use that as justification for their usage
Corporations captured and killed every other interesting way to use the Internet. Turns out they never actually wanted to connect the world, they just wanted to imprint themselves upon it.
Why not both? (Except not google... Privacy first)
As I said before:
There's dying on a hill, and then there's making that hill your one and only purpose in life.
Write a novel.
We have reached the point where the internet itself is a feminist plot and superweapon. Soon, life itself will have been a ploy by women.
Sorry, its such a stupid thing to say that I accidentally assumed you were saying something slightly smarter.