Reality?
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
If I was actually good at coding and stuff, what I'd try to do is put a naked filter on google glasses. Basically, when you looked at a woman, you could engage the "remove all her clothes" feature, which then would use top of the line AI/CGI/3DArt/Whatever technology to impose the computer's best guess of what her naked body looks like so the entire time you're looking at her through google glasses she appears naked to you.
So yes, reality.
I already have a pair of those glasses, ordered from the back of a mid seventies MAD magazine
MAD Magazine didn't run advertising for anything but MAD books and back issues until the 2000s. Myth busted, methinks.
I'm sure you know the ads I mean (if you're old enough)
I'm posting on the internet after midnight on a weekday, I definitely remember old 70s comic book ads.
I bought a pair of glasses in a weird shop and now I keep seeing black people everywhere!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFjaETj_g9w
They made sure to block that quickly. There's a lot of use for human measurements using hololense and Kinect, but it would mean nude codes, so we don't get them.
They blocked that? No wonder it was a flop for consumers. If they led with that, they'd have sold out... until the gynocratic government eventually banned it.
you don't get it, not getting the ability to see random women on the street naked through my glasses is a feminist plot!
That just gave me a great idea too. You can literally program it to make ugly women disappear. Unless the woman is close to your proximity such that you'll potentially run into her, so you have to see her. You could program the google glasses to just project the proper backgrounds and objects around ugly women so that you wouldn't even notice their existence.
There's a lot of women out there these days that you wouldn't want to see naked. It's a blessing in disguise.
I think thats what happened. Many a person was fear mongering the chance of lecherous men.
Remember the uproar over the makeup remover apps!
I remember the race swapping feature which was cool as hell, but of course that got taken away as well.
The guys on 4chan can already do that from a picture of a woman and their autism. All you'd be doing is streamlining that to shorten the time until it was "real time."
Exactly. The technology is there to do it.
Man, you really are a loser obsessed with sex. In the past few days your contributions here have included (paraphrasing):
But I won't dent it. The only thing I enjoy doing in life is having sex with hot women. You're correct, I haven't done that in a while (since last June). I am going to Thailand in March though where I'll get plenty. I actually don't find enjoyment in anything else in life. All I enjoy doing is fucking attractive women.
Then why Thailand? Go to the Philippines.
If you do what you like, you'll like what you do...
It wouldn't be THAT hard.
Make one by 1) capturing the outline and skin-tone, 2) applying a small elision to the outermost outline, 3) redoubling a ribbon of the background towards the normal of the outline's surface, 4) noting sexed characteristics and positions using a convolution against grayscale examples, 5) correcting all colors within the outline to the noted skin-tone, 6) adding stereotypical creases and anatomical texture according to sex, 7) noting any rainbow in the clothing and writing GAY across that person's face.
Et Voilà.