It is the nature of a thing that matters. At its best, government is the smallest evil it can be, at its worst, it is the largest evil and ever-growing, but it is evil regardless.
"How could an entity whose only tool is the threat of deadly force act so forcefully?"
Ironically, this probably won't happen in Russia, the Middle East, Africa (because they have food issues and in some cases SERIOUS infection risks so they don't have time to give a fuck) and Asian countries like Japan. The former two aren't welcoming to gays but at least they aren't trying to poison you kids for virtue signal points!
Because I value children's ability to grow and learn free of adult corruption and manipulation over your right to flaunt your sexuality as the focus of your identity?
Maybe because you try to promote faggotry by characterizing homosexuals as "happy and carefree", in addition to wanting them to be 'welcomed'. No, faggots should either be dealt with on the spot, or sold to the moslems for sport. This includes every single one of their perverted supporters.
Because modern society derives the basis for its governments, in some way, on the replacemnt of God with "the state." A nation that does not derive its morality and authority from Jesus Christ, derives its mortality and authority from the devil. Simple as.
Haematologist and transfusion medicine specialist Dr Jim Faed said there was no evidence of any risk associated with blood from a person who has been vaccinated against Covid-19.
Yeah, cause it's brand new and no one has studied it; of course there's "no evidence".
Reminds me of the 2020 election, when Bill Barr proudly went on TV to declare that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. No, we didn't investigate, but there's no evidence!
This is getting into all those stories and books lefties are convinced will happen when the right wins. I keep thinking about the Giver when I read it.
If someone takes my kid, they die. I don't care who they are. In a healthy community, the entire community would help and defend that family. In a healthy nation, that government would be overthrown.
If they baby dies, and the parents don't go on a murdering spree against all those responsible... I guess it's just more proof that Whites have been turned into goy cattle.
A request by the family's lawyer to force the NZ Blood service to take blood from an unvaccinated donor of their choosing for the surgery was declined.
It doesn't say if they were stopping the surgery or not over this, just that it was requested.
Does the fact that New Zealand doesn't screen for vaccinated blood, the baby needs surgery now, "guardianship" is only temporary for the operation, and the parents are still going to be treated as such for everything else (or so they say) change anyone's mind? This is a very specific context. What would be the alternative?
They are trying to set an extreme precedent in order to discourage anyone else from making the same request. Because governments went all-in on the clotshot, and a mass awakening on this issue is one of a very few ways that those governments will be toppled.
You are not allowed to show skepticism to the vaccine. Trust in the vaccine, and by proxy, the government, is more important than the choices of the parent and the health of the baby.
The alternative to the state taking guardianship? Not doing that.
Yes, NZ obviously doesn't care about vexed blood, and in a sudden medical emergency, that is all the parents can get for their kid. If the parents were going to have the child die over it, then it would make sense for the state to take over (for their own reasons).
Speaking of context...
Te Whatu Ora's lawyer said in court last week that the baby could get more sick with every heartbeat, and he could deteriorate suddenly - so the case was heard urgently.
Te Whatu Ora told the court yesterday that doctors could be ready to operate within 48 hours of getting the go-ahead.
There were several days between legal proceedings leading up to this? If they were going to take that much time, they could probably meet the parents' demand for clean blood if they were so adamant about saving the child. Plenty of alternatives in that space.
The parents stipulated a donor of their choice--and it's not like blood donation is difficult. Grab a buddy with compatible blood type and have him give a liter (it's a baby, they don't need a lot of blood) and you're off to the races.
In Canada, as soon as I hit 14, the decision to receive cancer treatments rested entirely within my hands. I could have told them "No" and died, and neither the doctors nor my parents could have forced me to do otherwise. Before that, it was my guardians' (my parents') decision. If they said "Yes", then I received treatments. If they said "No", then I wouldn't have.
This is how it should be. The State should not have any power in forcing personal medical decisions on their populace. Doing otherwise is a direct infringement of universal human rights, and in a just world, would result in being tried for crimes against humanity.
I understand, medical decisions should always be your own or your parents. You can still blame them for making the wrong decision. Even though court cases like this don't outrage me by itself, a baby's life might be saved and they are not demonising the parents, I know what precedent they can set.
The parents had already organised a non-vaxxed blood donor. The non-scummy thing to do would simply be to use that donor's blood. But this is the kind of shit that happens when you let the state control your health care, and then let that state get taken over by Marxist/Progressive scum.
Why is every government in the entire world evil?
It is the nature of a thing that matters. At its best, government is the smallest evil it can be, at its worst, it is the largest evil and ever-growing, but it is evil regardless.
"How could an entity whose only tool is the threat of deadly force act so forcefully?"
Ironically, this probably won't happen in Russia, the Middle East, Africa (because they have food issues and in some cases SERIOUS infection risks so they don't have time to give a fuck) and Asian countries like Japan. The former two aren't welcoming to gays but at least they aren't trying to poison you kids for virtue signal points!
You need to be thrown off the building with them.
Because I value children's ability to grow and learn free of adult corruption and manipulation over your right to flaunt your sexuality as the focus of your identity?
Maybe because you try to promote faggotry by characterizing homosexuals as "happy and carefree", in addition to wanting them to be 'welcomed'. No, faggots should either be dealt with on the spot, or sold to the moslems for sport. This includes every single one of their perverted supporters.
This paragraph projects harder than an Imax screening....
Because modern society derives the basis for its governments, in some way, on the replacemnt of God with "the state." A nation that does not derive its morality and authority from Jesus Christ, derives its mortality and authority from the devil. Simple as.
We allowed Satan to take the wheel
we are still well into the age of satan
Another sacrifice for Moloch.
Yeah, cause it's brand new and no one has studied it; of course there's "no evidence".
Reminds me of the 2020 election, when Bill Barr proudly went on TV to declare that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. No, we didn't investigate, but there's no evidence!
nobody ever said it had tobe "widespread", either
It's literally like a kid covering their eyes and saying "It's not true if I don't see it!"
And as long as we don't investigate, there will never been any "evidence". So they can say this without lying.
This is getting into all those stories and books lefties are convinced will happen when the right wins. I keep thinking about the Giver when I read it.
at this point i hope they're right, because they deserve it.
No guns to protect your young.
If someone takes my kid, they die. I don't care who they are. In a healthy community, the entire community would help and defend that family. In a healthy nation, that government would be overthrown.
If they baby dies, and the parents don't go on a murdering spree against all those responsible... I guess it's just more proof that Whites have been turned into goy cattle.
Just shows that if your kid needs major medical care you probably want to do the whole medical tourism thing and take them somewhere sane.
So does the New Zealand government also forcibly seize children of Jehovah Witnesses?
It doesn't say if they were stopping the surgery or not over this, just that it was requested.
Does the fact that New Zealand doesn't screen for vaccinated blood, the baby needs surgery now, "guardianship" is only temporary for the operation, and the parents are still going to be treated as such for everything else (or so they say) change anyone's mind? This is a very specific context. What would be the alternative?
Giving the infant unvaxed blood.
They are trying to set an extreme precedent in order to discourage anyone else from making the same request. Because governments went all-in on the clotshot, and a mass awakening on this issue is one of a very few ways that those governments will be toppled.
You are not allowed to show skepticism to the vaccine. Trust in the vaccine, and by proxy, the government, is more important than the choices of the parent and the health of the baby.
It was NZ's very own horsefaced PM who said that the government was the only source of Truth, after all.
The alternative to the state taking guardianship? Not doing that.
Yes, NZ obviously doesn't care about vexed blood, and in a sudden medical emergency, that is all the parents can get for their kid. If the parents were going to have the child die over it, then it would make sense for the state to take over (for their own reasons).
Speaking of context...
There were several days between legal proceedings leading up to this? If they were going to take that much time, they could probably meet the parents' demand for clean blood if they were so adamant about saving the child. Plenty of alternatives in that space.
The parents stipulated a donor of their choice--and it's not like blood donation is difficult. Grab a buddy with compatible blood type and have him give a liter (it's a baby, they don't need a lot of blood) and you're off to the races.
In Canada, as soon as I hit 14, the decision to receive cancer treatments rested entirely within my hands. I could have told them "No" and died, and neither the doctors nor my parents could have forced me to do otherwise. Before that, it was my guardians' (my parents') decision. If they said "Yes", then I received treatments. If they said "No", then I wouldn't have.
This is how it should be. The State should not have any power in forcing personal medical decisions on their populace. Doing otherwise is a direct infringement of universal human rights, and in a just world, would result in being tried for crimes against humanity.
I understand, medical decisions should always be your own or your parents. You can still blame them for making the wrong decision. Even though court cases like this don't outrage me by itself, a baby's life might be saved and they are not demonising the parents, I know what precedent they can set.
The parents had already organised a non-vaxxed blood donor. The non-scummy thing to do would simply be to use that donor's blood. But this is the kind of shit that happens when you let the state control your health care, and then let that state get taken over by Marxist/Progressive scum.