TLDW: essentially there was the initial 'bondage bear' being held by a child that Shoeonhead brought attention that we initially condemned.
But the REALLY weird thing is the picture with a handbag included with it, on the the table underneath were papers that when zoomed in allude to two court cases in America, one was the Ashcroft vs free speech coalition (the latter was on behalf of the porn industry) which the latter won when courts agreed that the CP laws were to vague.
The second was alluding to United States vs Williams where he was sent to jail for pandering (advertising) CP, disputed that to the supreme Court and they upheld the sentence
The fact that on a photo shoot, where everything has to be ok'd and these two papers are in the same shoot as a kid holding a bondage bear is WAY too suspicious.
Probably because they left the door too open into their degenerate world and are quickly trying to close it before the public see too much and (rightfully) decide to reintroduce burnings and lynch mobs.
Because so much of the shit they do in the name of 'artistic expression' with REAL people and kids makes lolicon a distraction and an actual inquisition justified and necessary.
Q is a leftwing actualy conspiracy theory. It's a few lone nuts and a few trolls propped up by glowies and other democrats to slander everyone they hate. It is not real.
That said, fashion houses are run by tranny pedos or their friends these days, so, myth confirmed.
I'm sure whoever the French/Spanish faggots were who planned this campaign, it was very much on purpose and meant to be a "what can we get away" with edgy shit winking about how LGBTs corrupt kids, which the LGBT activist community sees as a big joke, right up until the backlash hits them, and then they call it terrorism and violence to criticize it.
The original photoshoot story was for real. A ton of the posts after that is astroturfed crap. Makes me wonder if the pedos are diluting the narrative on purpose to make people dismiss it ALL as crazy conspiracy theories.
Do you really need to be involved with Q to know that putting little kids in bondage gear for pictures representing your product is a terrible idea?
Lotus eaters just did a video on it: https://youtu.be/aKPkU_tRyZI
TLDW: essentially there was the initial 'bondage bear' being held by a child that Shoeonhead brought attention that we initially condemned.
But the REALLY weird thing is the picture with a handbag included with it, on the the table underneath were papers that when zoomed in allude to two court cases in America, one was the Ashcroft vs free speech coalition (the latter was on behalf of the porn industry) which the latter won when courts agreed that the CP laws were to vague.
The second was alluding to United States vs Williams where he was sent to jail for pandering (advertising) CP, disputed that to the supreme Court and they upheld the sentence
The fact that on a photo shoot, where everything has to be ok'd and these two papers are in the same shoot as a kid holding a bondage bear is WAY too suspicious.
Don't use Twitter so most of the info I get is second hand from that, but guess she's the one that found it then Shoe amplified it.
Which is good, what's not good is I feel like we need to return to Tudor levels of laws with this amount of open degeneracy.
Probably because they left the door too open into their degenerate world and are quickly trying to close it before the public see too much and (rightfully) decide to reintroduce burnings and lynch mobs.
Because so much of the shit they do in the name of 'artistic expression' with REAL people and kids makes lolicon a distraction and an actual inquisition justified and necessary.
Q is a leftwing actualy conspiracy theory. It's a few lone nuts and a few trolls propped up by glowies and other democrats to slander everyone they hate. It is not real.
That said, fashion houses are run by tranny pedos or their friends these days, so, myth confirmed.
Just satanic pedo elites being openly satanic pedo elites. Here is some more that you'll appreciate.
Edit: Just saw someone below me posted it already. Oops.
Just check this twitter thread they clearly have a lot of fucked up stuff going on.
the q people are right about pedos. pizzagate are right about pedos.
good question.
All I know is that they put those bondage stuff with the little girl in it but I have no idea if this is some deep state pedo ring
Still freaking disturbing that they thought they could put out those pictures.
I didn't know what Imp was talking about so I looked it up. It's Balenciaga making ads of little kids holding BSDM gimp faggot outfit teddy bears.
I'm sure whoever the French/Spanish faggots were who planned this campaign, it was very much on purpose and meant to be a "what can we get away" with edgy shit winking about how LGBTs corrupt kids, which the LGBT activist community sees as a big joke, right up until the backlash hits them, and then they call it terrorism and violence to criticize it.
Tucker Carlson covered it in his intro the other night.
I'd never heard about it before that.
The original photoshoot story was for real. A ton of the posts after that is astroturfed crap. Makes me wonder if the pedos are diluting the narrative on purpose to make people dismiss it ALL as crazy conspiracy theories.
Nobody pays attention to Q expect a handful of boomers and leftists
Fashions for rich pedophiles.