It keeps popping up in places I read, is it astroturfed crap/distraction or is there something about it?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Lotus eaters just did a video on it: https://youtu.be/aKPkU_tRyZI
TLDW: essentially there was the initial 'bondage bear' being held by a child that Shoeonhead brought attention that we initially condemned.
But the REALLY weird thing is the picture with a handbag included with it, on the the table underneath were papers that when zoomed in allude to two court cases in America, one was the Ashcroft vs free speech coalition (the latter was on behalf of the porn industry) which the latter won when courts agreed that the CP laws were to vague.
The second was alluding to United States vs Williams where he was sent to jail for pandering (advertising) CP, disputed that to the supreme Court and they upheld the sentence
The fact that on a photo shoot, where everything has to be ok'd and these two papers are in the same shoot as a kid holding a bondage bear is WAY too suspicious.
Don't use Twitter so most of the info I get is second hand from that, but guess she's the one that found it then Shoe amplified it.
Which is good, what's not good is I feel like we need to return to Tudor levels of laws with this amount of open degeneracy.
Probably because they left the door too open into their degenerate world and are quickly trying to close it before the public see too much and (rightfully) decide to reintroduce burnings and lynch mobs.
Because so much of the shit they do in the name of 'artistic expression' with REAL people and kids makes lolicon a distraction and an actual inquisition justified and necessary.